US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 1380.12 § 6
ALLEGATIONS THAT ARE UNSUBSTANTIATED OR NOT CREDIBLE, OR HAVE
RESULTED IN EXONERATION
Generally, allegations that cannot be substantiated or are not credible, or have resulted in the
exoneration of an employee, are not considered potential impeachment information.
Nonetheless, upon request, the Bureau contact person must provide to the requesting official
such information that reflects upon the truthfulness or bias of the employee in the following
circumstances:
P1380.12 1/3/2018 5
■ The requesting official advises the contact person that it is required by a Court decision in the
district where the investigation or case is being pursued.
On or after the effective date of the Attorney General’s policy, July 11, 2014:
The allegation was made by a Federal prosecutor, judge, or magistrate judge.
The allegation received publicity.
■ The requesting official and the contact person agree that such disclosure is appropriate, based
upon exceptional circumstances of the case or the role of the witness.
■ Disclosure is otherwise deemed appropriate by the contact person.
When there is a question of whether information may be used for impeachment purposes, the
contact person must provide the information and advise the requesting official, to the extent
determined, whether any aforementioned allegation is unsubstantiated or not credible, or resulted
in exoneration.
History
PS 1380.12 dated 2018-01-03
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
e6efaabed6df129590bb7f15f8d63a217e0b6d4af8f98fb46d9d5181a28e7e00
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.