US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 1075.01 § 4
§ 512.14 Submission and processing of proposal
(a) An applicant may submit a preliminary research proposal for review by the Office of
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 7
Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20534. Staff response to the preliminary proposal does not constitute a final decision.
(b) If the study is to be conducted at only one institution, the applicant shall submit a formal
proposal to the warden of that institution. Proposal processing will be as follows:
In instances where a study is to be conducted at only one institution, prior to
submitting a proposal to the BRRB, the researcher must submit a formal proposal to
the Warden of that institution for review and approval by the local research review
board prior to BRRB review.
(1) The warden shall appoint a local research review board to consult with
operational staff, to evaluate the proposal for compliance with research
policy, and to make recommendations to the warden. The local research
review board is encouraged, but not required, to meet the membership
requirements of an IRB, as specified in 28 CFR part 46.
(2) The warden shall review the comments of the board, make a recommendation
regarding the proposal, and forward the proposal package to the Regional
Director, with a copy to the Chief, ORE.
(3) The Regional Director shall review the proposal and forward recommendations to
the Chief, ORE.
(c) If the study is to be conducted at more than one institution or at any other Bureau
location, the applicant shall submit the research proposal to the Chief, Office of Research
and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC
20534. The Chief, ORE, shall determine an appropriate review process.
(d) All formal proposals will be reviewed by the BRRB.
(e) The BRRB chairperson may exercise the authority of the full BRRB under an
expedited review process when another official IRB (either within or outside the
Bureau) has approved the research, or when, in his/her judgment, the research
proposal meets the minimal risk standard and involves only the following:
(1) The study of existing data, documents, or records; and/or
(2) The study of individual or group behavior or characteristics of individuals, where
the investigator does not manipulate subjects' behavior and the research will not
involve stress to subjects. Such research would include test development and
studies of perception, cognition, or game theory. If a proposal is processed under
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 8
expedited review, the BRRB chairperson must document in writing the reason for
that determination.
(f) The Chief, ORE, shall review all recommendations made and shall submit them in
writing to the Director, Bureau of Prisons.
(g) The Director, Bureau of Prisons, has final authority to approve or disapprove all
research proposals. The Director may delegate this authority to the Assistant
Director, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division.
(h) The approving authority shall notify in writing the involved region(s), institution(s),
and prospective researcher of the final decision on a research proposal.
History
PS 1075.01 dated 2026-05-07
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
19e8270c9e98b87b392832c9ce225e3977326478487e4a5f31518f949c7b4c0c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.