US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 1075.01 § 3
§ 512.11 Requirements for research projects and researchers
(a) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, the Bureau requires the
following:
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 2
(1) In all research projects the rights, health, and human dignity of individuals
involved must be respected.
(2) The project must have an adequate research design and contribute to the
advancement of knowledge about corrections.
The BRRB will determine if the project has an adequate research design and
contributes to the advancement of knowledge about corrections to a degree that
would justify the approval of a research project.
(3) The project must not involve medical experimentation, cosmetic research, or
pharmaceutical testing.
(4) The project must minimize risk to subjects; risks to subjects must be reasonable
in relation to anticipated benefits. The selection of subjects within any one
institution must be equitable. When applicable, informed consent must be sought
and documented (see §§ 512.15 and 512.16).
Informed consent is generally not necessary when only archival information in
Bureau records is being analyzed.
(5) Incentives may not be offered to help persuade inmate subjects to participate.
However, soft drinks and snacks to be consumed at the test setting may be
offered. Reasonable accommodations such as nominal monetary recompense for
time and effort may be offered to non-confined research subjects who are both:
(i) No longer in Bureau of Prisons custody, and
(ii) Participating in authorized research being conducted by Bureau
employees or contractors.
(6) The researcher must have academic preparation or experience in the area of study
of the proposed research and in the research methodology proposed.
(7) The researcher must assume responsibility for actions of any person engaged to
participate in the research project as an associate, assistant, or subcontractor to
the researcher.
(8) Except as noted in the informed consent statement to the subject, the researcher
must not provide research information which identifies a subject to any person
without that subject’s prior written consent to release the information. For
example, research information identifiable to a particular individual cannot be
admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit or other judicial,
administrative, or legislative proceeding without the written consent of the
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 3
individual to whom the data pertains.
(9) The researcher must adhere to applicable provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974
and regulations pursuant to this Act.
The information the Bureau collects is protected by the following legislation and
regulations, including amendments:
Privacy Act of 1974
Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988
Freedom of Information Act of 1966
E-Government Act of 2002
Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, and
OMB Circular A-130, Management of Federal Information Resources,
Appendix I
(10) The research design must be compatible with both the operation of prison
facilities and protection of human subjects. The researcher must observe the rules
of the institution or office in which the research is conducted
BRRB approved studies are subject to the capability of the Bureau to
accommodate the research.
Researchers are required to submit a data destruction plan for review and
approval. Additionally, researchers are required to submit a confirmation of data
destruction to the BRRB as part of their closeout.
Researchers are expected to comply with all existing Bureau policies which
might impact the collection, management, and destruction of data.
(11) Any researcher who is a non-employee of the Bureau must sign a statement
in which the researcher agrees to adhere to the provisions of this subpart.
(12) Except for computerized data records maintained at an official Department of
Justice (DOJ) site or computer, records which contain non-disclosable
information directly traceable to a specific person may not be stored in, or
introduced into, non-DOJ approved computers or servers.
Non-disclosable information directly traceable to a specific person is also
known as “personally identifiable information” (PII).
(13) If the researcher is conducting a study of special interest to the Office of
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 4
Research and Evaluation (ORE), but the study is not a joint project involving
ORE, the researcher may be asked to provide ORE with the computerized
research data, not identifiable to individual subjects, accompanied by detailed
documentation. These arrangements must be negotiated prior to the beginning of
the data collection phase of the project.
If the study is a joint project between the ORE and a researcher, the researcher
may share individually identifiable data being collected with ORE. If the study is
not a joint project, ORE must obtain BRRB approval for any additional analysis.
(14) The researcher must submit planned methodological changes in a research
project to the IRB for approval, and may be required to revise study procedures
in accordance with the new methodology.
(b) Requests from Federal agencies, the Congress, the Federal judiciary, or State or local
governments to collect information about areas for which they are responsible and
requests by private organizations for organizational rather than personal information
from Bureau staff shall be reviewed by ORE to determine which provisions of this
subpart may be waived without jeopardizing the safety of human subjects. ORE shall
document in writing the waiver of any specific provision along with the justification.
2. § 512.12 Content of research proposal
When submitting a research proposal, the applicant must provide the following information:
(a) A summary statement which includes:
(1) Name(s) and current affiliation(s) of the researcher(s);
(2) Title of the study;
(3) Purpose of the project;
(4) Location of the project;
(5) Methods to be employed;
(6) Anticipated results;
(7) Duration of the study;
(8) Number of subjects (staff/inmates) required and amount of time required from each;
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 5
and
(9) Indication of risk or discomfort involved as a result of participation.
(b) A comprehensive statement which includes:
Review of related literature;
Bureau researchers should also include references to related, current, or past
studies by other Bureau components.
Detailed description of the research method;
Significance of anticipated results and their contribution to the
advancement of knowledge;
Specific resources required from the Bureau;
Description of all possible risks, discomforts, and benefits to individual subjects
or a class of subjects, and a discussion of the likelihood that the risks and
discomforts will actually occur;
Description of steps taken to minimize any risks described in (b)(5) of this section;
Description of physical and/or administrative procedures to be followed to:
(i) Ensure the security of any individually identifiable data that are being
collected for the project, and
(ii) Destroy research records or remove individual identifiers from those
records when the research has been completed.
Description of any anticipated effects of the conduct of the research
project on institutional programs and operations; and
Relevant research materials such as sample informed consent statements,
questionnaires, and interview schedules.
This must include a full curriculum vitae (CV) for the researcher(s) with primary
responsibility for the conduct of the project, demonstrating their competence in
the subject matter and in the appropriate methodology.
(c) A statement regarding assurances and certification required by 28 CFR part 46, if
1075.01 5/7/2026 Federal Regulations from 28 CFR: this type. Implementing instructions: this type. 6
applicable.
3. § 512.13 Institutional review board
(a) The Bureau of Prisons’ central institutional review board shall be called the Bureau
Research Review Board (BRRB). It shall consist of the Chief, ORE, at least four
other members, and one alternate, appointed by the Director, and shall meet a
sufficient number of times to insure that each project covered by 28 CFR part 46
receives an annual review. A majority of members shall not be Bureau employees.
The BRRB shall include an individual with legal expertise and a representative for
inmates whom the Director determines is able to identify with inmate concerns and
evaluate objectively a research proposal's impact on, and relevance to, inmates and to
the correctional process.
BRRB Members must have varying backgrounds and must not be associated, directly or
indirectly, with the conduct of the research. Members must avoid conflict of interest,
ensuring varied perspectives for comprehensive ethical review of human subjects
research.
(b) The Chief, ORE, shall serve as chairperson of the BRRB. If a potential conflict of
interest exists for the BRRB chairperson on a particular research proposal, the
Assistant Director, Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division, shall appoint
another individual to serve as chairperson on matters pertaining to that project.
A designated staff member from ORE will serve as both the BRRB administrator and the
Human Subjects Protection Officer.
a. The BRRB must include:
(1) At least one scientist.
(2) An individual with legal expertise, most typically from the Bureau’s Office of
General Counsel.
(3) A representative for inmates, typically a Bureau chaplain with experience in
correctional settings, whom the BRRB chairperson determines is able to identify
with inmate concerns and evaluate objectively a research proposal’s impact on,
and relevance to, inmates and to the correctional process.
(4) One non-scientist.
(5) Members of both sexes.
History
PS 1075.01 dated 2026-05-07
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
2fc6eeddf57a946eb6ce421062933158c42811b4c9766b5d4e9f41c04ca75ed3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.