US · guidance
BOP Program Statement 1066.06 § 6
PILOT PROGRAM CONCLUSION
At the conclusion of the pilot program period, and once a decision regarding the next steps is
made by the Executive Staff, the pilot program must be formally closed by drafting a
memorandum to memorialize the findings of the program. Regardless of whether the Executive
Staff decides to end or further expand the program the memorandum must be drafted by the
sponsoring division or region and must include a summary of the timeline of the project,
information about outcomes of the evaluation component, and a clear timeline for the end or
continuation of the program. Pilots are generally expected to take less than one year to complete,
though an extension may be requested by the sponsoring AD or RD, if required. Pilots will all be
reviewed for progress annually. The memorandum must also include the signature of the
sponsoring Executive Team member and relevant AD or RD.
1066.06 3/19/2026 PROPERTY OF US GOVERNMENT 4
REFERENCES
Program Statement
Research
Forms
BP-A0932 Pilot Proposal Worksheet Establishing Evaluation Criteria
BP-A0933 Pilot Evaluation Summary and Assessment
Records Retention Requirements
Requirements and retention guidance for records and information applicable to this program are
available in the Records and Information Disposition Schedule (RIDS) on the Bureau’s intranet
site.
1066.06 3/19/2026 PROPERTY OF US GOVERNMENT 5
History
PS 1066.06 dated 2026-03-19
Provenance
- Source
- bop.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- bop-ps-2026-09-20
- Content hash
7758f901ea2da3f384100ddfb27734212676cbf4b60426659a4c30d2c66e5500
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.