US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-22, ch. 3, § 80
Fiscal Year 2018 and After Payments to Skilled Nursing Facilities
(SNFs) That Do Not Submit Required Quality Data
(Rev. 12182, Issued:08-03-23, Effective:01-01-23, Implementation: 09-04-23)
The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (IMPACT Act) added
section 1899B to the Act that imposed new data reporting requirements for certain PAC
providers, including SNFs, and required that the Secretary implement a SNF quality reporting
program (SNF QRP). Beginning with fiscal year 2018, and each subsequent year, if a SNF
does not submit required quality data, their payment rates for the year are reduced by two (2)
percentage points for that fiscal year.
Penalties for Failure to Report
For fiscal year 2018, and each subsequent year, if a SNF does not submit required quality data, their
payment rates for the year are reduced by 2 percentage points for that fiscal year. Application of the
2% reduction may result in an update that is less than 0.0 for a fiscal year and in payment rates for a
fiscal year being less than such payment rates for the preceding fiscal year. In addition, reporting-based reductions to the Annual Payment Update (APU) will not be cumulative; they will only apply
for the FY involved.
Every year, in late spring/summer, CMS will provide Medicare contractors with a Technical
Direction Letter (TDL) identifying SNFs not meeting the quality data reporting requirements. The
contractor shall notify the SNFs that they have been identified as not complying with the
requirements of submitting quality data and are scheduled to have Medicare payments to their facility
reduced by 2 percentage points. Medicare contractors shall include the model language at the end of
this section in their initial notification letter to the SNFs. The notification letter shall inform the SNF
whether they were identified as not complying with the SNF quality reporting requirements. The
notification letter shall also inform the SNF regarding the process to request a reconsideration of their
payment reduction if they disagree with the determination. The reconsideration process shall be
outlined within the initial notification letter. Contractors shall send the notification letters no later
than 10 business days from the receipt of the TDL.
Immediately after the notification letters are issued, Medicare contractors shall submit to the CMS
contacts noted in the TDL a list of facilities who received a letter. There is a 30-day period from the
date of the notification letter to submit a letter requesting reconsideration and documentation to
support a finding of compliance.
CMS will then review all reconsideration requests received and provide a determination to the
Medicare contractor typically within a period of 2 to 3 months. In its review of the SNF
documentation, CMS will determine whether evidence to support a finding of compliance has been
provided by the SNF. The determination will be made based solely on the documentation provided. If
clear evidence to support a finding of compliance is not present, the 2% reduction will be upheld. If
clear evidence of compliance is present, the reduction will be reversed.
After the reconsideration process has occurred and prior to October 1 of each FY, CMS will provide
the Medicare contractors with a final list of SNFs that failed to comply with the data submission
requirements. The Medicare contractors will then be responsible for notifying each SNF that failed to
comply with the quality data submission requirements that it will receive a two (2) percentage point
reduction in the Annual Payment Update (APU). The Medicare contractors will also update the SNF
provider file based on the appropriate scenarios listed below. Medicare contractors shall include the
model language at the end of this section in the dispute notification letters to the SNFs. Contractors
shall send this second letter only to SNFs that requested reconsideration. Additionally, the Medicare
contractors shall include information regarding the SNFs right to further appeal the 2 percentage
point reduction via the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeals process. Contractors
shall send these second notification letters no later than 10 business days from the receipt of the
TDL.
If the SNF does not dispute their reduction, the Medicare contractor shall update their provider file
for the SNF. The contractor shall set an indicator in the provider file that triggers Medicare systems
to calculate the 2 percentage point reduction on all claims for the upcoming fiscal year. If CMS
determination upholds the 2 percentage point reduction, the contractor shall update their provider file
in this fashion also.
If the CMS determination reverses the 2 percentage point reduction, the contractor shall not update
their provider file for the SNF and shall notify the SNF that they will receive their full SNF PPS
payment update for the upcoming year.
Model language for initial notification letters:
“This letter is to officially notify you that (Facility Name, CMS Certification Number 000000)
is subject to a reduction in payment for not meeting section Improving Medicare Post-Acute
Care Transformation Act of 2014
(IMPACT Act), Section 1888(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)) requirement
for SNFs to submit quality data. Therefore, Medicare payments to your facility will be reduced
by two (2) percentage points for [insert upcoming year]; unless you can provide evidence that
this determination is in error. CMS updates the requirements and the quality reporting
measures required for the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) annually through rulemaking.
CMS has determined that this SNF is subject to a 2% reduction in the FY (insert upcoming
year) Annual Payment Update (APU) for failure to meet quality reporting requirements
pursuant to the Impact Act Section 1888(e) because of the following reason(s):
• The SNF failed to submit the required data to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN); and/or
• The SNF failed to submit the required quality data that are to be submitted to the CMS
designated data submission system.
If you believe you have been in compliance with the quality data reporting requirement and
have been identified for this payment reduction in error, you must submit an email requesting
reconsideration and provide documentation demonstrating your compliance. You have the
right to request a reconsideration of this decision. If you choose to request a reconsideration of
this decision, you must submit the request no later than 30 days following the receipt of this
letter.
The request must include the following information:
• The SNF CMS Certification Number (CCN);
• The SNF business name;
• The SNF business address;
• The CEO or CEO-designated representative contact information including name,
email address, telephone number, and physical mailing address;
• The CMS identified reason(s) for non-compliance from the non-compliance
notification letter;
• Information supporting the SNF belief that non-compliance is in error, or evidence of
the impact of extraordinary circumstances which prevented timely submission of
data.
The request for reconsideration must be accompanied by supporting documentation
demonstrating compliance. CMS will be unable to review any request that fails to provide the
necessary documentation along with the request for reconsideration. Supporting documentation
may include any or all of the following:
• Email communication;
• Data submission reports from the CMS designated data submission system;
• Data submission reports from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN);
• Proof of previous waiver approval;
• Notification of the CCN activation letter to prove that the CCN was not activated by
the end of the reporting quarter;
• Other documentation that may support the rationale for seeking reconsideration.
Please ensure that NO protected health information (PHI) is included in the
documentation being submitted for review.
Documentation that does not support a finding of compliance is as follows:
• Evidence or admission of error on the part of SNF staff, even if the involved staff
member are no longer employed by the SNF and/or a corrective action plan has been
or will be put in place after the end of the reporting year;
• Evidence or assertion that failure to comply was the fault of a vendor or contractor
that was hired by the SNF to perform reporting functions; and,
• Evidence of delays establishing electronic data interchange connectivity between the
SNF and the Medicare claims processing contractor for the purpose of billing, since
SNF quality reporting data is not dependent on billing.
Your letter and documentation must be submitted via email to CMS for reconsideration, using
the following email address: SNFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.
In its review of the SNF documentation, CMS will determine whether evidence to support a
finding of noncompliance has been provided by the SNF. The determination will be made
based solely on the documentation provided. CMS will not contact the SNF to request
additional information or to clarify incomplete or inconclusive information. For further
questions related to the reconsideration process, please refer to the following CMS SNF
website: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/SNF-Quality-Reporting/SNF-Quality-Reporting-Reconsideration-and-Exception-
and-Extension.html
A SNF must submit a request for reconsideration and receive a decision on that request before
they can file an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB).”
The Medicare contractor shall update (or not update) the SNF provider file based on the
appropriate scenario listed below:
Upheld
• If the SNF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and did not request
reconsideration, then the Medicare contractor shall set a quality reporting indicator in the
provider file that triggers Medicare systems to calculate the 2% reduction on all of the SNF’s
claims for the upcoming fiscal year.
• If the SNF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and requested a
reconsideration, but on reconsideration CMS upheld the decision to apply the 2% reduction, then
the Medicare contractor shall set a quality reporting indicator in the provider file that triggers
Medicare systems to calculate the 2% reduction on all of the SNF’s claims for the upcoming
fiscal year.
Reversed
• If the SNF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and requested a
reconsideration, and on reconsideration CMS determined that the SNF should not be subject to the
2% reduction (i.e., reversed its decision), then the Medicare contractor shall not update the quality
reporting indicator in the SNF’s provider specific file and shall notify the SNF that they will receive
their full SNF PPS payment update for the upcoming fiscal year.
• If the SNF submitted the necessary SNF Quality Reporting data and was never notified that it might
potentially be subject to the 2% reduction, then the Medicare contractor shall ensure that the
indicator value does not apply the reduction.
Model language for dispute notification letters (SNF provider notification instructions
contained in second TDL):
Upheld:
“Thank you for requesting a reconsideration of the determination made by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding reduction to this SNF’s annual update for
failure to meet the requirements of the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP).
CMS reviewed the reconsideration request of this SNF and is upholding the decision to reduce
the Annual Payment Update (APU) for Medicare payments for Fiscal Year (FY) (insert
upcoming year). Our records indicate that this SNF did not provide evidence that it submitted
required quality data during the required timeframes. Therefore, for services provided by this
SNF between October 1, (insert upcoming year) and September 30, (insert upcoming
year), the Annual Payment Update (APU) for Medicare payments for FY (insert upcoming
year) will be reduced by two (2) percentage points.
If your facility wishes to further appeal this determination, the appeals process set forth in 42
CFR Part 405, Subpart R (a Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeal) applies.
Details are available on the CMS.gov PRRB Review Instructions website.
CMS appreciates the opportunity to respond to the reconsideration request for the SNF QRP.
For additional concerns related to the reconsideration process, questions may be submitted to
the following CMS email address: SNFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.”
Reversed:
“Thank you for requesting a reconsideration of the determination made by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding reduction to this SNF’s Annual Payment
Update (APU) for failure to meet the requirements of the SNF Quality Reporting Program
(QRP).
CMS reviewed the reconsideration request and determined that this SNF satisfactorily met the
quality data requirements for the FY (insert upcoming year) payment determination. Therefore,
the two (2) percentage point reduction to the FY (insert upcoming year) Annual Payment
Update (APU) for failure to comply with quality reporting requirements will not be applied.
CMS appreciates the opportunity to respond to this reconsideration request for the SNF QRP.
For additional concerns related to the reconsideration process, questions may be submitted to the
following CMS email address: SNFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.”
History
(Rev. 12182, Issued:08-03-23, Effective:01-01-23, Implementation: 09-04-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
966d96d237c6524706d4bedb852c390c7e833c97b51c5f4ebc09eccdcbb20b4a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.