US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-22, ch. 3, § 70
Payments to Home Health Agencies That Do Not Submit Required Quality Data
In calendar year 2007 and each subsequent year, if a home health agency does not submit required
quality data, their annual payment updates (APU) for the year are reduced by 2 percentage points.
Original Medicare considers the following data as meeting the reporting requirement:
• OASIS data submitted by HHAs for all episodes beginning on or after July 1 of the
previous year, and before July 1, of the current year, and
• Home Health Care Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems (HHCAHPS)
monthly data collection and submission from April 1 of the prior year through March 31 of the
current year.
NOTE: If agencies have served 59 or fewer HHCAHPS-survey eligible patients in the year
immediately prior to the data collection year, and these agencies complete an HHCAHPS
Participation Exemption Request form for the APU year associated with the data collection year, then
they are exempt from HHCAHPS for the APU year. Annually, HHAs must count their patients in
the year prior to the data collection year to determine if they need to do HHCAHPS data
collection. The exemption form is on the HHCAHPS website, https://homehealthcahps.org. The
HHCAHPS Survey eligibility criteria are listed on the HHCAHPS website:
https://homehealthcahps.org/SurveyandProtocols/SurveyMaterials.aspx#catid1.
Illustration of HHCAHPS periods:
(A)
Annual
Payment
Update
Calendar
Year
(B)
Did the HHA
serve 60 or
more
HHCAHPS
eligible
patients in the
previous year?
(C)
If the HHA served 60 or
more survey eligible
patients in the previous
year, then the HHA must
collect HHCAHPS for the
year below.
(D)
If the HHA served 59 or less
survey eligible patients in the
previous year, then the HHA
must complete the Participation
Exemption Request form on the
HHCAHPS website in the “For
HHAs Only secure portal
Column C”. To receive an
exemption, the HHA must submit
a Participation Exemption
Request Form by the date noted
below.
2020 April 1, 2017 -
March 31, 2018 April 1, 2018 - March 31,
2019
March 31, 2019
2021 April 1, 2018 -
March 31, 2019 April 1, 2019 - March 31,
2020
March 31, 2020
Each fall, Medicare contractors with home health workloads will receive a technical direction
letter (TDL) which provides a list of HHAs that have not submitted the required OASIS and/or
HHCAHPS data during the established timeframes and which have submitted covered claims to
Medicare during these timeframes. The list(s) provided will have the facility name, CCN,
mailing information, reason for failure (OASIS or CAHPS or both) and will also provide the
MAC that should be sending out the letter.
The contractor shall notify the HHAs on the list that they have been identified as not being in
compliance with the requirement of submitting quality data and are scheduled to have Medicare reduce their
annual payment update (APU) by two percentage points.
Medicare contractors shall include the model language at the end of this section in their notification letter
to the HHA. The notification letter shall inform the HHA whether they were identified as not being in
compliance with the OASIS data requirement, the HHCAHPS data requirement, or both. Contractors
shall send notification letters no later than 5 business days from the receipt of the TDL.
Immediately after the notification letters are issued, Medicare contractors shall submit to the CMS contacts
noted in the TDL a list of agencies who received a letter. Medicare contractors shall notify home health
agencies who wish to dispute their payment reduction of the procedure to request a reconsideration. There
is a 30 day period from the date of the notification letter to submit a letter electronically requesting
reconsideration and documentation to support a finding of compliance.
Using the model language at the end of this section contractors shall inform HHAs about
documentation to support a finding of compliance.
For payments in calendar year 2011 and after, documentation of OASIS compliance may include any of
the following:
evidence of OASIS transmissions during the reporting period (e.g., an OASIS Final Validation
Report from the CMS designated data submission system showing a timely submission date);
for providers who received their initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of the
reporting year, evidence that the HHA did not receive their CMS Certification Number (CCN) from
Medicare until after the close of the reporting year (e.g., a notification letter from the survey and
certification staff at the CMS RO dated after June 30);
for providers who received their initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of the
reporting year, evidence that they received their CCN too late in the reporting year for the provider
to receive their permanent OASIS transmitter ID from their State OASIS Automation Coordinator
and submit data (e.g., during the last week of June); or
for providers who received their initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of the
reporting year, evidence that the HHA received their CCN in the last weeks of the reporting year
(e.g., in June), took prompt action to request their permanent OASIS transmitter ID from their State
OASIS Automation Coordinator and were delayed by CMS or its agents.
For payments in calendar year 2012 and after, HHAs requesting reversal of the HHCAHPS
decision need to include the following:
Evidence that the HHA continuously collected data for the 12 months, and submitted data
to the Home Health CAHPS Data Center during the required timeframe. The required 12
months are for April 1st through March 31st, or
• For HHAs that have served 59 or fewer HHCAHPS -survey eligible patients show
evidence of their census. If the HHAs have evidence of their completion of the
exemption form, then they should send a copy of their form.
The contractor shall inform HHAs that documentation of the following does not support a
finding of compliance:
evidence or admission of error on the part of HHA staff, even if the involved staff members
are no longer employed by the HHA and/or a corrective action plan has been or will be put
in place after the end of the reporting year;
• evidence or assertion that failure to comply was the fault of a vendor or contractor that
was hired by the HHA to perform reporting functions (the HHA is responsible for the
actions of its contractors, vendors or other agents on the HHA’s behalf);
evidence of delays establishing electronic data interchange connectivity between the HHA
and the Medicare claims processing contractor for the purpose of billing, since OASIS
transmission is not dependent on billing and the HHA should request their OASIS transmitter
ID from the State at the same time they request billing system access from the Medicare
claims processing contractor; and
in cases where the ownership of the HHA changed during the reporting year but the CCN of
the HHA did not change, evidence that failure to comply was the fault of a previous owner.
Contractors should direct electronic submission of reconsideration requests and documentation to a
dedicated CMS e-mail address. If a provider’s documentation contains protected health
information (PHI) in error, documents containing PHI should not be forwarded. CMS will review
the documentation and provide a determination to the Medicare contractor as soon as possible, but
typically within a period of 6-7 weeks.
The following example illustrates the timeframes for the complete process using hypothetical
dates:
1) CMS issues the TDL providing the list of HHAs on Friday, September 17;
2) Contractors must issue notification letters to HHAs by the fifth business day after
receipt of the TDL, on September 24;
3) The timely reconsideration period ends 30 calendar days later, no later than October
24;
4) CMS provides determinations to contractors during the second week of December.
In its review of the HHA’s documentation, CMS will determine whether evidence to support a
finding of compliance has been provided by the HHA. The determination will be made based
solely on the documentation provided. CMS will not contact the HHA to request additional
information or to clarify incomplete or inconclusive information. If clear evidence to support a
finding of compliance is not present, the 2% reduction will be upheld. If clear evidence of
compliance is present, the reduction will be reversed.
If the CMS determination upholds the 2% reduction, CMS shall provide the Medicare contractor
with a statement of the findings that support the decision. The contractor shall notify the HHA in
writing and inform them of their right to further appeal the 2% reduction via the Provider
Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeals process. Medicare contractors shall include the
model language at the end of this section in their dispute determination letter to the HHA.
Contractors shall insert the CMS-provided statement of findings in the blank provided in the
model language. Contractors shall send this second letter only to HHAs that requested a
reconsideration.
If the HHA does not dispute their reduction, the Medicare contractor shall update their provider
file for the HHA. The contractor shall set an indicator in the provider file that triggers Medicare
systems to calculate the 2% reduction on all claims for the upcoming calendar year. If the CMS
determination upholds the 2% reduction, the contractor shall update their provider file in this
fashion also.
If the CMS determination reverses the 2% reduction, the contractor shall not update their
provider file for the HHA and shall notify the HHA that they will receive their full HH PPS
annual payment update (APU) for the upcoming year.
Model language for initial notification letters:
“This letter is to officially inform you that CMS has determined your home health agency (HHA) is
subject to a reduction in the annual payment update for not meeting the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of
2005 requirement for HHAs to submit quality data. Therefore, Medicare payments to your agency will
be reduced for [insert upcoming year], unless you can provide evidence that this determination is in
error.
Currently, the quality data reporting requirement consists of timely submission of Outcomes
and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data as required by your conditions of
participation (CoPs), and timely submission of Home Health Care Consumer Assessment of
Health Providers and Systems (HHCAHPS) data.
In order to meet the CoPs, OASIS data is required to be transmitted within 30 days of the
assessment date. OASIS data submitted within 30 days of the assessment date is considered to
have met the requirement of submitting the required quality data. The reporting year for [insert
upcoming year] was the period between July 1, [insert previous year] and June 30, [insert
current
year]. Under the CoPs, assessments in June [insert current year] would meet the requirement if
submitted by July 31, [insert current year]. New HHAs, defined as agencies with participation
dates in the Medicare program on or after May 1, [insert current year], are excluded from this
requirement.
[For letters in calendar year 2012 only:]
In order to meet the HHCAHPS requirement, HHAs needed to participate in an HHCAHPS dry
run in third quarter 2010, and continue monthly data collection and submission of data to the
Home Health CAHPS Data Center beginning in October 2010, through March 2011. If
agencies had less than 60 patients between April, 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, then they were
exempt from HHCAHPS participation for CY 2012. These HHAs were to complete an
HHCAHPS Participation Exemption Request form for CY 2012 on the HHCAHPS Website,
https://homehealthcahps.org.
[For letters in calendar years 2013 and after:]
In order to meet the HHCAHPS requirement, HHAs must collect monthly HHCAHPS data and
submit data to the Home Health CAHPS Data Center from April 1, [insert the prior year] through
March 31,[insert the current year]. If agencies had 59 or fewer HHCAHPS-survey eligible
patients between April 1, [insert the year 2 years prior] and March 31, [insert the prior year], then
they are exempt from HHCAHPS participation for [insert current year]. These HHAs were to
complete an HHCAHPS Participation Exemption Request form on the HHCAHPS Website,
https://homehealthcahps.org.
CMS review of OASIS and HHCAHPS submissions for this period found that your agency is not
excluded or exempt from the reporting requirements and [insert whether the HHA was non-compliant with OASIS, HHCAHPS or both]. CMS’s review of paid claims has shown that you
have received Medicare payment for claims with dates of service within the reporting year.
Consequently, for episodes that end on or after January 1, [insert upcoming year] and prior to
January 1, [insert following year], annual payment updates to your agency will be reduced by 2%.
The national 60-day episode payment amount and the national standardized per-visit amounts used
to calculate low utilization payment adjustments (LUPAs) and outlier payments for providers that
did not submit quality data, are listed in separately labeled tables in the recent HH PPS payment
update final regulation for [insert upcoming year].
If you believe you have been in compliance with the quality data reporting requirement and have
been identified for this payment reduction in error, you must submit a letter requesting
reconsideration and provide documentation demonstrating your compliance.
Documentation to support a finding of compliance with OASIS reporting may include any of the
following:
evidence of OASIS transmissions during the reporting period (e.g., an OASIS Final
Validation Report from the national system showing a timely submission date);
if your HHA received your initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of
the reporting year, evidence that your HHA did not receive your CMS Certification Number
(CCN) from Medicare until after the close of the reporting year (e.g., a
notification letter from the survey and certification staff at the CMS RO dated after June
30);
if your HHA received your initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of
the reporting year, evidence that your HHA received your CCN too late in the reporting
year to request and receive your permanent OASIS transmitter ID and submit data (e.g.,
during the last week of June); or
if your HHA received your initial survey in the period between January 1 and April 30 of
the reporting year, evidence that your HHA received your CCN in the last weeks of the
reporting year (e.g., in June), took prompt action to request your permanent OASIS
transmitter ID and were delayed by CMS or its agents.
Documentation to support a finding of compliance with HHCAHPS reporting may include any of
the following:
Evidence that the HHA continuously collected data and submitted data to the Home
Health CAHPS Data Center during the required timeframe. [For letters in calendar year
2012 only:] The required period of data collection includes the dry run data in the third
quarter 2010, the fourth quarter 2010 (all the months of October, November and
December 2010), and the first quarter 2011 (all the months of January, February, and
March 2011). [For letters in calendar year 2013 and after:] The required period of data
collection includes all months from April 1, [insert the prior year] through March 31,
[insert the current year]; or
For HHAs that have served 59 or fewer HHCAHPS -survey eligible patients in the year
from April 1, [insert the year 2 years prior] and March 31, [insert the prior year], evidence
that the HHA filed the Participation Exemption Request Form, on the form that is on
www.homehealthcahps.org, by the deadline date specified in the HH PPS payment
update final regulation for [insert current year].
Note that documentation of the following does NOT support a finding of compliance:
evidence or admission of error on the part of your staff, even if the involved staff members
are no longer employed by your HHA and/or a corrective action plan has been or will be
put in place after the end of the reporting year;
evidence or assertion that failure to comply was the fault of a vendor or contractor that
was hired by your HHA to perform reporting functions;
evidence of delays establishing electronic data interchange connectivity between your
HHA and [insert Medicare contractor name] for the purpose of billing, since OASIS
transmission is not dependent on billing and the HHA should request their OASIS
transmitter ID from the State at the same time they request billing system access
from [insert Medicare contractor name]; or
in cases where the ownership of the HHA changed during the reporting year but the CCN
of the HHA did not change, evidence that failure to comply was the fault of a previous
owner.
Your letter and documentation should be submitted via e-mail to CMS for reconsideration,
using the following e-mail address: HHAPUreconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov .
Requests and supporting documentation must be received electronically no later than 30 days
from the date of this notification.
When preparing your request, be careful to ensure the following:
Documents provided are relevant to the reason for your payment reduction (i.e. do not
send OASIS documentation in response to a HHCAHPS related reduction)
No protected health information (PHI) is included in the documents
All documents pertain to the same, current reporting year
Each request provides documents regarding a single HHA (do not combine requests or
attach a list of HHA provider numbers to a request)
If requesting a HHCAHPS reconsideration regarding a participation exception, provider
specific information detailing why your HHA had no eligible patients.
An HHA must submit a request for reconsideration and receive a decision on that request before
they can file an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB).”
Model language for dispute determination letters:
“This letter is in response to your request for reconsideration of the scheduled 2% Annual
Payment Update reduction in payments to your agency, due to your agency being identified
as [insert whether the HHA was non-compliant with OASIS, HHCAHPS or both].
CMS has reviewed the documentation you provided and determined that your agency is subject to
the 2% reduction in the Annual Payment Update for CY [insert upcoming year], due to your
agency’s noncompliance with submitting quality data during the required timeframes. Specifically,
CMS officials found [insert CMS-provided statement of findings]. If your agency wishes to
further appeal this determination, the appeals process set forth in 42 CFR Part 405, Subpart R (a
Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeal) applies.
Exhibit 1 – Incentive Payment Results Report
(Rev. 11, Issued: 03-26-13, Effective: 06-25-12, Implementation: 06-25-12)
Contractors are to insert the change request (CR) number for the recurring update notification
associated with the PQRS or eRx payment in the title of the Incentive Payment Results Report
displayed in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1 – Incentive Payment Results Report
(Rev. 11, Issued: 03-26-13, Effective: 06-25-12, Implementation: 06-25-12)
Contractors shall report the following to CMS for each workload:
Glossary of terms:
Workload – each contractor number for which the MAC is responsible (Example: 01503, 01504, 01505)
Payment/Paid – check has been invoiced and mailed or check has been sent via EFT
1. Have you verified that the incentive payments have made it through every aspect of processing to payment?
Yes _____ No_____
2. Do you have documentation available confirming that all payments have been paid to eligible professionals?
Yes_____ No_____
3. Annotate how many incentive checks you were scheduled to pay per the payment file received from the CMS mainframe.
# of checks scheduled to be paid = _____
Note: Use one line to report for each workload. The totals in this chart should equal the number of checks annotated above that the
contractor was scheduled to pay.
MAC/Carrier Contractor
Number
States Number
of Checks
Paid
Total Dollar
Amount for
Checks Paid
Number of Checks Not
Paid
Provide details in chart 4
Total Dollar Amount
for Checks NOT paid
Provide details in chart 4
Example: 00000 AK 225 $17,234.50 10 $2,359.00
Totals
4. Annotate the details for incentive checks “Not Successfully” paid due to the appropriate reason below.
# of checks “Not Successfully” paid = _____:
Note: This chart should only show details for payment issues that remain unresolved as of the date of this report. If you encountered a
payment issue and it has been resolved, do not report it in this chart.
MAC/Carrier Contractor
Number
States # of
HIGLAS
Rejections
Total
Dollar
Amount
for
HIGLAS
rejections
# of
Invalid
TIN(s)
Provide
details in
Chart 5
Total
Dollar
Amount
for
Invalid
TINs
# of Do
Not
Forwards
(DNFs)
*No follow up
is required for
DNFs.
Total
Dollar
Amount
for DNFs
# of
Other
Provide
details in
chart 6
Total
Dollar
Amount
for
Checks
not paid
for
“Other”
reasons
Grand Total
of ALL
checks “Not
Successfully”
paid
Example:
Totals
5. Provide details of unresolved payment issues for payments associated with invalid TINs:
MAC/Carrier Contractor Number State Invalid TIN number(s) Payment Amount
6. Provide details on unresolved payment issues for payments in “Other” column
MAC/Carrier Contractor Number Details for Payment issue(s) annotated in table 4
Add additional rows to report as necessary.
Exhibit 2 – PQRS and eRx Incentive Payment File Record Layout
(Rev. 11, Issued: 03-26-13, Effective: 06-25-12, Implementation: 06-25-12)
The PQRS and eRx incentive payments are not combined into one file. Each incentive has its
own separate file.
Exhibit 2
(Rev. 11, Issued: 03-26-13, Effective: 06-25-12, Implementation: 06-25-12)
PQRS and eRx INCENTIVE PAYMENT FILE
RECORD LAYOUT
FIELD NAME
0BSTART/END
POSITION PIC COMMENT
HEADER RECORD
Header Indicator 1-4 X(4) Value “HEAD”
Header Record Number 5-5 X(1) Value 1 to 9
Filler 6-6 X(1) Value spaces
Incentive Type Year
Indicator
7-10 X(4)
--Incentive Type 7-8 X(2) Value PQ denotes PQRS Incentive; Value
RX denotes eRx Incentive. NOTE: Each
incentive will have its own separate file;
they are not combined into one file.
--Incentive Reporting Year 9-10 X(2) Value denotes reporting year for Incentive
Filler 11-125 X(115) Value spaces
DATA RECORD
Carrier/MAC Number 1-5 X(5) Left justified.
FILLER 6-24 X(19) Value spaces (in the future, this field may
contain the NPI).
Incentive Recipient Tax ID 25-34 X(10) Left justified, one blank field.
FILLER 35-39 X(5) Value spaces
Incentive Amount 40-49 9(8)v99
FILLER 50 X(1) Value spaces
Report Start Date 51-58 X(8) CCYYMMDD (beginning time period for
reporting of claims for PQRS or eRx; i.e.
January 1, 2009).
FILLER 59 X(1) Value spaces
Report End Date 60-67 X(8) CCYYMMDD (ending time period for
reporting of claims for PQRS or eRx; i.e.
December 31, 2009).
FILLER 68-125 X(58) Value spaces
History
(Rev. 12293; Issued:10-12-23; Effective: 01-01-23; Implementation: 11-13-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
59a221e95cd70726b08100a5baff81018d29e5fd8fe2d2c7f956f017180a0d04
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.