US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-22, ch. 3, § 50
Fiscal Year 2017 and After Payments to Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
(IRFs) That Do Not Submit Required Quality Data
(Rev. 12901; Issued:10-24-24; Effective:06-07-24; Implementation:11-26-24)
Section 3004 of the Affordable Care Act directs the Secretary to establish quality reporting requirements
for IRFs. Beginning with fiscal year 2014, and each subsequent year, if an IRF does not submit required
quality data, their payment rates for the year are reduced by two (2) percentage points for that fiscal year.
Penalties for Failure to Report
For fiscal year 2014, and each subsequent year, if an IRF does not submit required quality data, their payment
rates for the year are reduced by 2 percentage points for that fiscal year. Application of the 2% reduction may
result in an update that is less than 0.0 for a fiscal year and in payment rates for a fiscal year being less than such
payment rates for the preceding fiscal year. In addition, reporting-based reductions to the market basket increase
factor will not be cumulative; they will only apply for the FY involved.
Every year, in late spring/summer, CMS will provide Medicare contractors with a Technical Direction Letter
(TDL) identifying IRFs not meeting the quality data reporting requirements. The contractor shall notify the IRFs
that they have been identified as not complying with the requirements of submitting quality data and are
scheduled to have Medicare payments to their facility reduced by 2 percentage points. Medicare contractors shall
include the model language at the end of this section in their initial notification letter to the IRFs. The notification
letter shall inform the IRF whether they were identified as not complying with the IRF quality reporting
requirements. The notification letter shall also inform the IRF regarding the process to request a reconsideration
of their payment reduction if they disagree with the determination. The reconsideration process shall be outlined
within the initial notification letter. Contractors shall send the notification letters no later than 10 business days
from the receipt of the TDL.
Immediately after the notification letters are issued, Medicare contractors shall submit to the CMS contacts noted
in the TDL a list of facilities who received a letter. There is a 30-day period from the date of the notification
letter to submit a letter requesting reconsideration and documentation to support a finding of compliance.
CMS will then review all reconsideration requests received and provide a determination to the Medicare
contractor typically within a period of 2 to 3 months. In its review of the IRF documentation, CMS will
determine whether evidence to support a finding of compliance has been provided by the IRF. The determination
will be made based solely on the documentation provided. If clear evidence to support a finding of compliance is
not present, the 2% reduction will be upheld. If clear evidence of compliance is present, the reduction will be
reversed.
After the reconsideration process has occurred and prior to October 1 of each FY, CMS will provide the
Medicare contractors with a final list of IRFs that failed to comply with the data submission requirements. The
Medicare contractors will then be responsible for notifying each IRF that failed to comply with the quality data
submission requirements that it will receive a two (2) percentage point reduction in the annual increase factor.
The Medicare contractors will also update the IRF provider file based on the appropriate scenarios listed below.
Medicare contractors shall include the model language at the end of this section in the dispute notification letters
to the IRFs. Contractors shall send this second letter only to IRFs that requested reconsideration. Additionally,
the Medicare contractors shall include information regarding the IRFs right to further appeal the 2 percentage
point reduction via the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeals process. Contractors shall send
these second notification letters no later than 10 business days from the receipt of the TDL.
If the IRF does not dispute their reduction, the Medicare contractor shall update their provider file for the IRF.
The contractor shall set an indicator in the provider file that triggers Medicare systems to calculate the 2
percentage point reduction on all claims for the upcoming fiscal year. If CMS determination upholds the 2
percentage point reduction, the contractor shall update their provider file in this fashion also.
If the CMS determination reverses the 2 percentage point reduction, the contractor shall not update their provider
file for the IRF and shall notify the IRF that they will receive their full IRF PPS payment update for the
upcoming year.
Model language for initial notification letters:
“This letter is to officially notify you that (Facility Name, CMS Certification Number 000000) is subject
to a reduction in payment for not meeting the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 requirement for IRFs to
submit quality data. Therefore, Medicare payments to your facility will be reduced by two (2) percentage
points for [insert upcoming year]; unless you can provide evidence that this determination is in error. CMS
updates the requirements and the quality reporting measures required for the IRF Quality Reporting
Program (QRP) annually through rulemaking.
CMS has determined that this IRF is subject to a 2% reduction in the FY (insert upcoming year) annual
increase factor for failure to meet quality reporting requirements pursuant to the Affordable Care Act
Section 3004 because of the following reason(s):
• The IRF failed to submit the required data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN); and/or
• The IRF failed to submit the required quality measures data that are to be submitted to the CMS
designated data submission system.
If you believe you have been in compliance with the quality data reporting requirement and have been
identified for this payment reduction in error, you must submit an email requesting reconsideration and
provide documentation demonstrating your compliance. You have the right to request a reconsideration of
this decision. If you choose to request a reconsideration of this decision, you must submit the request no
later than 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
The request must include the following information:
• The IRF CMS Certification Number (CCN);
• The IRF business name;
• The IRF business address;
• The CEO or CEO-designated representative contact information including name, email address,
telephone number, and physical mailing address;
• The CMS identified reason(s) for non-compliance from the non-compliance notification letter;
• Information supporting the IRF belief that non-compliance is in error, or evidence of the impact
of extraordinary circumstances which prevented timely submission of data.
The request for reconsideration must be accompanied by supporting documentation demonstrating
compliance. CMS will be unable to review any request that fails to provide the necessary documentation
along with the request for reconsideration. Supporting documentation may include any or all of the
following:
• Email communication;
• Data submission reports from the CMS designated data submission system;
• Data submission reports from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN);
• Proof of previous waiver approval;
• Notification of the CCN activation letter to prove that the CCN was not activated by the end of
the reporting quarter;
• Other documentation that may support the rationale for seeking reconsideration.
Please ensure that NO protected health information (PHI) is included in the documentation being
submitted for review.
Documentation that does not support a finding of compliance is as follows:
• Evidence or admission of error on the part of IRF staff, even if the involved staff member are no
longer employed by the IRF and/or a corrective action plan has been or will be put in place after
the end of the reporting year;
• Evidence or assertion that failure to comply was the fault of a vendor or contractor that was
hired by the IRF to perform reporting functions; and,
• Evidence of delays establishing electronic data interchange connectivity between the IRF and
the Medicare claims processing contractor for the purpose of billing, since IRF quality reporting
data is not dependent on billing.
Your letter and documentation must be submitted via email to CMS for reconsideration, using the
following email address: IRFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.
In its review of the IRF documentation, CMS will determine whether evidence to support a finding of
noncompliance has been provided by the IRF. The determination will be made based solely on the
documentation provided. CMS will not contact the IRF to request additional information or to clarify
incomplete or inconclusive information. For further questions related to the reconsideration process, please
refer to the following CMS IRF website: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/IRF-Quality-Reporting/IRF-Quality-Reporting-Reconsideration-and-Exception-
and-Extension.html
An IRF must submit a request for reconsideration and receive a decision on that request before they can
file an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB).”
The Medicare contractor shall update (or not update) the IRF provider file based on the appropriate
scenario listed below:
Upheld
• If the IRF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and did not request
reconsideration, then the Medicare contractor shall set a quality reporting indicator in the provider file that
triggers Medicare systems to calculate the 2% reduction on all of the IRF’s claims for the upcoming fiscal
year.
• If the IRF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and requested a reconsideration,
but on reconsideration CMS upheld the decision to apply the 2% reduction, then the Medicare contractor
shall set a quality reporting indicator in the provider file that triggers Medicare systems to calculate the 2%
reduction on all of the IRF’s claims for the upcoming fiscal year.
Reversed
• If the IRF was notified that it was potentially subject to the 2% reduction, and requested a reconsideration, and
on reconsideration CMS determined that the IRF should not be subject to the 2% reduction (i.e., reversed its
decision), then the Medicare contractor shall not update the quality reporting indicator in the IRF’s provider
specific file and shall notify the IRF that they will receive their full IRF PPS payment update for the upcoming
fiscal year.
• If the IRF submitted the necessary IRF Quality Reporting data and was never notified that it might potentially
be subject to the 2% reduction, then the Medicare contractor shall ensure that the indicator value does not apply
the reduction.
Model language for dispute notification letters (IRF provider notification instructions contained in
second TDL):
Upheld:
“Thank you for requesting a reconsideration of the determination made by the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding reduction to this IRF’s annual update for failure to meet the
requirements of the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP).
CMS reviewed the reconsideration request of this IRF and is upholding the decision to reduce the annual
increase factor for Medicare payments for Fiscal Year (FY) (insert upcoming year). Our records indicate
that this IRF did not provide evidence that it submitted required quality data during the required
timeframes. Therefore, for services provided by this IRF between October 1, (insert upcoming year) and
September 30, (insert upcoming year), the annual increase factor for Medicare payments for FY (insert
upcoming year) will be reduced by two (2) percentage points.
If your facility wishes to further appeal this determination, the appeals process set forth in 42 CFR Part 405,
Subpart R (a Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) appeal) applies. Details are available on the
CMS.gov PRRB Review Instructions website.
CMS appreciates the opportunity to respond to the reconsideration request for the IRF QRP. For
additional concerns related to the reconsideration process, questions may be submitted to the following
CMS email address: IRFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.”
Reversed:
“Thank you for requesting a reconsideration of the determination made by the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding reduction to this IRF’s annual increase factor for failure to meet the
requirements of the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP).
CMS reviewed the reconsideration request and determined that this IRF satisfactorily met the quality data
requirements for the FY (insert upcoming year) payment determination. Therefore, the two (2) percentage
point reduction to the FY (insert upcoming year) annual increase factor for failure to comply with quality
reporting requirements will not be applied.
CMS appreciates the opportunity to respond to this reconsideration request for the IRF QRP. For additional
concerns related to the reconsideration process, questions may be submitted to the following CMS email
address: IRFQRPReconsiderations@cms.hhs.gov.”
History
(Rev. 12901; Issued:10-24-24; Effective:06-07-24; Implementation:11-26-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
ca8aa343583998c5d8a28bf495588f42231c27cc7a9cc9e4b9f6bdfe3b9af168
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.