US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-22, ch. 1, § 70.2.1
Criteria for Determination of Satisfactory Reporting for Group
Practices and Process for Reporting under the GPRO
(Rev. 10, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 10-29-12, Implementation: 10-29-12)
For purposes of determining whether a group practice satisfactorily submits Physician Quality
Reporting System quality measures data for a particular program year, each selected group
practice is required to complete this data collection web-interface for a specified number of
quality measures. The quality measures are grouped into disease modules plus a series of patient
care measures. Data from the January 1st through October 29th NCH file for the program year
(10 months) is used by CMS to randomly assign Medicare beneficiaries to each physician group
practice TIN. Medicare beneficiaries are retrospectively assigned to the TIN based on a
determination by CMS that the group practice provided the plurality of office or other outpatient
services to the beneficiary (with a minimum of at least two visits) in the 10-month period.
Furthermore, part-year and managed care patients are not considered since CMS would have
incomplete claims data for these beneficiaries and group practices may not have had sufficient
time to impact the quality of their care.
In 2011, for each disease module or patient care measure, the selected Physician Quality
Reporting System GPRO I practice was required to complete the data collection web-interface
for the first 411 consecutively assigned and ranked Medicare beneficiaries. Assigned
beneficiaries will be limited to those Medicare FFS beneficiaries with Medicare Part B for whom
Medicare is the primary payer. If the pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries was less than 411 for
any module/measure, then the group practice was required to report on 100% (all) of the
assigned beneficiaries for that module/measure to satisfactorily participate in the Physician
Quality Reporting System GPRO I. The reporting mechanism, reporting period, and criteria for
satisfactory reporting under the GPRO I for 2011 are summarized in the Table 6 below.
Table 6: 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System Process for Physician Group Practices
to Participate as Group Practices and Criteria for Satisfactory Reporting of Data on
Quality Measures by Group Practices for GPRO I
34
Reporting
Mechanism
Reporting Criteria Reporting
Period
A pre-populated
data
collection
web-interface
provided by
CMS
• Report on all measures included in the data collection
web-interface (26 measures); and
• Complete the web-interface for the first 411 consecutively
ranked and assigned beneficiaries in the order in which
they appear in the group’s sample for each disease module
or patient care measure. If the pool of eligible assigned
beneficiaries is less than 411, then report on 100% of
assigned beneficiaries.
January 1,
2011–
December
31, 2011
In addition, for 2011, GPRO II groups were required to report on a specified number of
individual measures and measures groups depending on the group practice's size. For individual
measures reporting, GPRO II groups were required to report on a specified percentage of
patients. To satisfactorily report measures groups for the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting
System GPRO II, the group practice need only report on the minimum number of patients
specified in Table 9 for their group size. In addition, since we did not have the ability to
determine whether the registries can ensure that only unique patients are counted, GPRO II
groups were required to report the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System data via claims
unless the only measures groups that apply to the practice are one of the four registry-only
measures groups. Group practices that must report on one of the four registry-only measures
groups in order to meet the criteria for satisfactory reporting were able to use the registry-
reporting mechanism to submit all of their 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System data via the
registry reporting mechanism. The reporting mechanism, reporting period, and criteria for
satisfactory reporting under the GPRO II for 2011 are summarized in the Table 7 below.
35
Table 7: 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System Process for Physician Group Practices
to Participate as Group Practices and Criteria for Satisfactory Reporting of Data on
Quality Measures by Group Practices for GPRO II
Group size
(number of
eligible
professionals)
Number of
measures
groups
required to
be reported
Minimum
number of
Medicare
Part B
patients in
denominator
for
satisfactory
reporting of
measures
groups
Number of
individual
measures
required to
be reported
Percent of
Medicare
Part B
patients in
denominator
for
satisfactory
reporting of
individual
measures via
claims (%)
Percent of
Medicare
Part B
patients in
denominator
for
satisfactory
reporting of
individual
measures via
registries
(%)
2-10 1 35 3 50 80
11-25 1 50 3 50 80
26-50 2 50 4 50 80
51-100 3 60 5 50 80
101-199 4 100 6 50 80
In 2012, the GPRO II reporting option was eliminated, leaving a single GPRO reporting option.
However, CMS finalized two different satisfactory reporting criteria under the GPRO for groups
comprised of 25-99 eligible professionals and groups comprised of 100+ eligible professionals.
With respect to the criteria for satisfactory reporting for groups comprised of 25-99 eligible
professionals, for each disease module or patient care measure, the selected Physician Quality
Reporting System GPRO practice must complete the data collection web-interface for the first
218 consecutively assigned and ranked Medicare beneficiaries. Assigned beneficiaries will be
limited to those Medicare FFS beneficiaries with Medicare Part B for whom Medicare is the
primary payer. If the pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries was less than 218 for any
module/measure, then the group practice is required to report on 100% (all) of the assigned
beneficiaries for that module/measure to satisfactorily participate in the Physician Quality
Reporting System GPRO.
With respect to the criteria for satisfactory reporting for groups comprised of 100+ eligible
professionals, for each disease module or patient care measure, the selected Physician Quality
Reporting System GPRO practice must complete the data collection web-interface for the first
411 consecutively assigned and ranked Medicare beneficiaries. Assigned beneficiaries will be
limited to those Medicare FFS beneficiaries with Medicare Part B for whom Medicare is the
primary payer. If the pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries was less than 411 for any
module/measure, then the group practice was required to report on 100% (all) of the assigned
beneficiaries for that module/measure to satisfactorily participate in the Physician Quality
Reporting System GPRO.
36
The reporting mechanism, reporting period, and criteria for satisfactory reporting under the
GPRO for 2012 are summarized in the Table 8 below.
Table 8: 2012 Criteria for Satisfactory Reporting of Data on Quality Measures by Group
Practices for theGPRO
Group Size Reporting
Mechanism
Reporting Criteria Reporting
Period
25-99
eligible
professionals
A
submission
web
interface
provided by
CMS
• Report on all measures included in the
web-interface (29 measures); and
• Populate the data field for the first 218
consecutively ranked and assigned
beneficiaries in the order in which they
appear in the group’s sample (with an
over-sampler of 327) for each disease
module or patient care measure. If the
pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries is
less than 218, then report on 100% of
assigned beneficiaries.
January 1,
2012–
December
31, 2012
100+
eligible
professionals
A
submission
web
interface
provided by
CMS
• Report on all measures included in the
web-interface (29 measures); and
• Populate the date fields for the first 411
consecutively ranked and assigned
beneficiaries in the order in which they
appear in the group’s sample (with an
over-sample of 616) for each disease
module or patient care measure. If the
pool of eligible assigned beneficiaries is
less than 411, then report on 100% of
assigned beneficiaries.
January 1,
2012–
December
31, 2012
History
(Rev. 10, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 10-29-12, Implementation: 10-29-12)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
aadabcd86208c3cf3efeb8a38dd66f54169594cbe92a632a178e2df73de3385e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.