US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-22, ch. 1, § 70.1.1
Criteria for Determination of Satisfactory Reporting of Individual
Measures for Claims-based Reporting
(Rev. 10, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 10-29-12, Implementation: 10-29-12)
As discussed in §60 above, eligible professionals have the option of reporting on individual
quality measures or on measures groups. The criteria for determining whether an eligible
professional satisfactorily reports data on Physician Quality Reporting System quality measures
for reporting individual quality measures are different from the criteria for satisfactory reporting
of measures groups.
To qualify for a Physician Quality Reporting System incentive payment through claims-based
reporting of individual measures prior to the 2011 program year, each eligible professional must
meet the following criteria for satisfactory reporting during the applicable reporting period:
23
• Report at least 3 Physician Quality Reporting System measures for the relevant program
year, or 1-2 measures, if less than 3 measures apply to an eligible professional; and
• Report each measure on at least 80 % of the Medicare Part B FFS patients to whom the
measure applies.
For years prior to the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System, if an eligible professional
reports less than 3 measures, the eligible professional must:
• Report on all measures that apply to the services furnished by the professional, and
• Report each measure for at least 80% of the eligible professional’s Medicare Part B FFS
patients for whom services were furnished during the reporting period to which the
measure(s) applies.
The eligible professional may also be subject to a Measure Applicability Validation (MAV)
process, which would allow CMS to determine whether an eligible professional should have
reported QDCs for additional measures.
For the 2007 Physician Quality Reporting System, these criteria applied to the 6-month reporting
period beginning July 1st only.
For the 2008 and 2009 Physician Quality Reporting System, these criteria applied to the 12-month reporting period beginning January 1st only.
For the 2010 Physician Quality Reporting System, these criteria apply to both the 12-month
reporting period beginning January 1st and the 6-month reporting period beginning July 1st for
claims-based reporting of individual measures. This results in a total of 2 reporting options for
claims-based reporting of individual measures for the 2010 Physician Quality Reporting System.
The 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System retained the 2 reporting options established in the
2010 Physician Quality Reporting System. However, the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting
System reduced the percentage of instances eligible professionals must report per measure.
Eligible professionals need only report on 50% instead of 80% of the Medicare Part B FFS
patients to whom each measure applies.
The 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System retains 1 of the 2 reporting options established in
the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System. The reporting option established for a 6-month
reporting period was eliminated. In addition, under all 2012 claims-based reporting options for
the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System, measures reported with a zero percent
performance rate will not be counted.
The 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System criteria for satisfactorily reporting individual
quality measures through claims-based reporting that each eligible professional must meet under
these 2 reporting options are summarized in Table 1 below along with the relevant reporting
period for each reporting option.
24
Table 1: 2012 Criteria for Satisfactory Reporting of Individual Quality Measures through
Claims
Reporting Criteria Reporting Period
• Report at least 3 Physician Quality Reporting System
measures, or
• 1-2 measures if less than 3 measures apply to an EP; and
• Report each measure for at least 50% of Medicare Part B
FFS patients to whom the measure applies.
If reporting less than 3 measures, the eligible professional must:
• Report on all measures that apply to the services
furnished by the professional, and
• Report each measure for at least 50% of the eligible
professional’s Medicare Part B PFS patients for whom
services were furnished during the reporting period to
which the measure(s) applies.
• May also be subject to a MAV process
January 1, 2012–
December 31, 2012
Eligible professionals who report on fewer than three individual Physician Quality Reporting
System individual quality measures may be subject to a two-step measure-applicability
validation (MAV) process. The purpose of the MAV is to determine whether the eligible
professional should have submitted quality-data codes for additional measures. If CMS finds
that eligible professionals who have reported fewer than three quality measures have not reported
additional measures that are also applicable to the services they furnished during the reporting
period, then those eligible professionals cannot earn the incentive payment. More information
on the MAV process for a specific program year is available in the Analysis and Payment section
of the CMS PQRS website at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRS.
When claims-based reporting of measures groups was introduced in the 2008 Physician Quality
Reporting System program, the only reporting period available for claims-based reporting of
measures groups was the 6-month reporting period beginning July 1, 2008. However, there were
2 reporting options for claims-based reporting of measures groups for 2008. The first reporting
option for claims-based reporting of measures groups for the 2008 Physician Quality Reporting
System consisted of the following criteria for satisfactory reporting:
• Report at least 1 measures group; and
• Report each measure in the measures group on at least 15 consecutively seen Medicare
Part B FFS patients to whom the measures in the measures group apply for each
participating eligible professional.
The term “consecutive” refers to the manner in which the patients are seen by the eligible
professional and are selected for inclusion in the eligible professional’s patient sample. The
patient sample must consist of at least 15 unique Medicare Part B FFS patients seen
consecutively, or in order, by date of service, by the eligible professional.
25
The second reporting option for claims-based reporting of measures groups for the 2008
Physician Quality Reporting System consisted of the following criteria for satisfactory reporting:
• Report at least 1 measures group; and
• Report each measure in the measures group on at least 80% of Medicare Part B FFS
patients for whom the measures in the measures group apply for each participating
eligible professional.
Beginning with the 2009 Physician Quality Reporting System, CMS implemented two reporting
periods for claims-based reporting of measures groups: a 12-month reporting period beginning
January 1st and a 6-month reporting period beginning July 1st.
For the 2009 Physician Quality Reporting System, there were 3 reporting options for claims-based submission of measures groups. Whereas for the 2008 Physician Quality Reporting
System only the 6-month reporting period was available for claims-based submission of
measures groups, both the 12-month and the 6-month reporting periods are available for claims-based submission of measures groups for the 2009 Physician Quality Reporting System. In
addition, CMS eliminated the option of reporting on at least one measures group on 15
consecutive patients for the 6-month reporting period but added the option of reporting on at
least 30 consecutive Medicare Part B FFS patients during the 12-month reporting period instead.
We also added a minimum sample size requirement for eligible professionals reporting on at
least 80% of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients. Eligible professionals reporting on 80%
of applicable Medicare Part B FFS patients for the 12-month reporting period must have at least
30 applicable patients. Eligible professionals reporting on 80% of applicable Medicare Part B
FFS patients for the 6-month reporting period must have at least 15 applicable patients.
CMS implemented the following changes to the 2009 Physician Quality Reporting System for
the 2010 Physician Quality Reporting System: (1) eliminated the requirement that the 30
patients be seen consecutively to allow an eligible professional to report on any 30 patients seen
at any time during the reporting period; and (2) reduced the minimum patient sample size
threshold for eligible professionals reporting on at least 80% of applicable Medicare Part B FFS
patients to 15 and 8 for the 12-month and 6-month reporting periods, respectively.
With respect to the reporting options for claims-based submission of measures groups, the 2011
Physician Quality Reporting System is largely identical to the 2010 Physician Quality Reporting
System. However, CMS implemented the following change in 2011: eligible professionals need
only report at least 50% (instead of the 80% that was required in the 2010 Physician Quality
Reporting System) of their Medicare Part B FFS patients seen during the reporting period to
which the measures group applies.
For the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System, CMS retained the two 2011 reporting options
for the 12-month reporting period. However, CMS implemented the following change for 2012:
measures within a measures group with a zero percent performance rate will not be counted.
Therefore, the 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System criteria for satisfactorily reporting
measures groups through claims-based reporting that each eligible professional must meet under
26
these 2 reporting options are summarized in Table 2 below along with the relevant reporting
period for each reporting option.
Table 2: 2012 Criteria for Satisfactory Reporting of Measures Groups through Claims
Reporting Criteria Reporting Period
• Report at least one measures group; and
• Report each measure within the measures group for at
least 30 Medicare Part B FFS patients to whom the
measures group apply
• Measures within a measures group with a zero percent
performance rate will not be counted.
January 1, 2012 –
December 31, 2012
• Report at least one measures group; and
• Report each measure within the measures group for at
least 50% of Medicare Part B FFS patients to whom the
measures in the measures group apply; but
• Report each measures group on at least 15 patients during
the reporting period for which the measures group
applies.
• Measures within a measures group with a zero percent
performance rate will not be counted.
January 1, 2012–
December 31, 2012
Eligible professionals choosing to participate in the Physician Quality Reporting System through
the claims-based reporting mechanism, regardless of whether they choose to report on individual
measures or measures groups, must have their own individual-level NPI and must consistently
use their individual NPI to correctly identify their services, procedures, and QDCs for an
accurate determination of satisfactory reporting. As stated in §30 above, the analysis of whether
an eligible professional has satisfactorily reported is performed at the individual eligible
professional level using the individual-level NPI. The eligible professional’s individual NPI must
be listed correctly along with the HCPCS codes for services, procedures, and QDCs on the claim.
More information on reporting options for a specific program year is available on the CMS
Physician Quality Reporting System website at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRS.
History
(Rev. 10, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 10-29-12, Implementation: 10-29-12)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
996a57f94dabe8999c7fad89e019367ce443c168c617c07a42fb27cc87d1eec4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.