US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-18, ch. 12, § 20.12.2
Cost-Sharing Subsidy
Benefits provided to EGWP enrollees cannot vary based on the Part D eligible’s LIS
eligibility. In addition, for an LIS Part D eligible enrollee in an EGWP, CMS will subsidize
only those cost-sharing obligations actually imposed on the Part D eligible under the plan,
which includes any supplemental prescription drug coverage offered by the employer/union
group health plan sponsor, with the supplemental coverage primary to the LIS program.
For example, an “800 series” PDP that provides benefits exclusively to employer X’s Part D
eligibles has a $100 deductible. For expenses incurred by a full subsidy eligible individual,
CMS’ payments to the plan will be determined based on that $100 deductible (minus any
minimal co-pays an individual is responsible for under 42 CFR 423.782(a)). CMS payments
will not be based on the plan having a $265 deductible (as reflected in Part D defined standard
prescription drug coverage).
As noted above, beginning with the 2008 contract year, PDP sponsors are no longer required
to submit Part D EGWP bids. As a result, beginning in 2008, CMS will not pay interim
prospective LIS cost sharing amounts to EGWPs because these amounts are directly derived
from Part D bids. Instead, as a condition of the waiver of the requirements to submit a Part D
bid, CMS will make LICS payments during the normal year-end reconciliation process.
History
(Rev.6, Issued: 11-07-08, Effective/Implementation: 11-07-08)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- iom-2026-09-17
- Content hash
55e91faeae386f1f17a83c33bb93befa6ae743f9a08fb108540dab26ea5858dc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.