US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-18, ch. 6, § 30.3.3.2
Formulary Maintenance Changes
In order to promote best practices and protect the interests of Medicare beneficiaries, CMS will
generally give positive consideration to the following types of formulary changes:
• Removal or placement in a less preferred tier of a brand name drug upon the availability
and addition of an A-rated generic or multi-source brand name equivalent, at a tier with
lower cost to the beneficiary.
• Removal of a non-Part D drug inadvertently included on the formulary.
• Addition of utilization management tools based upon a new FDA boxed warning.
• Removal of a drug based upon a new FDA market withdrawal notice.
• Removal of a drug based on long term shortage and market availability (described in
chapter 5, section 50.13).
• Removal or placement in a less preferred tier based upon new clinical guidelines or
information recognized by CMS (e.g., CDC’s recommendation against using older
antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis of the flu).
• The addition of utilization management when necessary to effectuate other approved
formulary changes (e.g., prior authorization on a brand name drug when generic is now
available on formulary at a lower cost), to help determine B vs. D coverage (subject to
CMS guidance on least burdensome ways to make this determination), or to promote safe
utilization of a Part D drug based upon new clinical guidelines or information.
Part D sponsors will need to provide a justification when submitting formulary maintenance
change requests, but they may assume that change requests based upon these justifications are
approved if they do not hear from CMS within 30 days of submission.
History
(Rev. 18, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 01-15-16; Implementation: 01-15-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- iom-2026-09-17
- Content hash
78f15f272f11eeef72cfceea3a565b0b0ae322a3448ad40c9b82682ec640d1d9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.