US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-18, ch. 9, § 50.7.3
Procedures for Self-Reporting Potential FWA and Significant Non Compliance
42 C.F.R. §§ 422.503(b)(4)(vi)(G), 423.504(b)(4)(vi)(G)
Self-reporting of FWA and Medicare program noncompliance is voluntary. CMS
nonetheless strongly encourages self-reporting as an important practice in
maintaining an effective compliance program. Sponsors should self-report potential
FWA discovered at the plan level, and potential fraud and abuse by FDRs, as well as
significant waste and significant incidents of Medicare program noncompliance.
Where sponsors notify the MEDICs of potential FWA in accordance with the
guidelines described below, the MEDICs will refer potential FWA to law
enforcement when appropriate. Issues that are referred to the NBI MEDIC and are
determined not to be potential FWA will be returned to the sponsor to be addressed.
Sponsors are required to investigate potential FWA activity to make a
determination whether potential FWA has occurred. Sponsors must conclude
investigations of potential FWA within a reasonable time period after the activity is
discovered. If after conducting a reasonable inquiry, the sponsor (e.g., the
compliance officer or SIU) determines that potential FWA related to the Medicare
Parts C or D programs has occurred, the matter should be referred to the NBI
MEDIC promptly. Sponsors should also refer potential FWA at the FDR levels to
the NBI MEDIC so that the NBI MEDIC can help identify and address any scams
or schemes.
Sponsors should also consider reporting potentially fraudulent conduct to
government authorities such as the Office of Inspector General (through the OIG’s
Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol) or the Department of Justice. All health care
providers doing business with Medicare that want to disclose violations of law are
eligible to disclose fraudulent conduct under the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol.
The Protocol offers a detailed step-by-step explanation of how a provider should
proceed in reporting and assessing the extent of potential fraud and how the OIG
will go about verifying irregularities.
Where a sponsor discovers an incident of significant Medicare program
noncompliance, the sponsor should report the incident to CMS as soon as possible
after its discovery. This will enable CMS to provide guidance to the sponsor on
mitigation of the harm caused by the incident of noncompliance. While no bright
line definition exists as to what is a “significant” or “serious” incident that should be
reported, sponsors should err on the side of over-reporting rather than under-reporting.
Self-reporting offers sponsors the opportunity to minimize the potential cost and
disruption of a full scale audit and investigation, to negotiate a fair monetary
settlement, and to potentially avoid an OIG permissive exclusion preventing the
entity from doing business with Federal health care programs.
History
(Chapter 9 - Rev. 15, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07-20 12)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- iom-2026-09-17
- Content hash
309d79c816c9aada1a7b80d955323500f03932bd76baf9e55a1deb9e6995258b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.