Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-18, ch. 7, § 60.6

Revision of Utilization Management Criteria Requirements

activein force · 2026-09-17 – presentas-observed

Part D sponsors must not change existing utilization management criteria (i.e., prior

authorization, step therapy, or quantity limits) to make them more restrictive or limiting without

direct CMS approval. During the contract year, a Part D sponsor should not need significant

revision of its approved criteria. For instance, submitted PA criteria should already have been

evaluated for clinical accuracy, since in accordance with 42 CFR 423.120(b)(vi), the sponsor’s

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee has completed a thorough review of proposed PA criteria

prior to submission of the formulary to CMS. Furthermore, during the annual enrollment period,

beneficiaries may view plan prior authorization criteria as a component of making informed

decisions. To permit changes after the annual enrollment period could undermine beneficiaries’

enrollment decisions and anticipated drug coverage. As a result, it is CMS’ expectation that Part

D sponsors will not update their utilization management criteria except under extraordinary

circumstances, such as when new drug safety-related information becomes available during the

contract year (e.g., FDA release of a new Black Box warning).

In the event that a Part D sponsor needs to make its utilization management criteria more

restrictive, the sponsor will be required to submit the proposed changes to CMS in advance.

CMS will address each request in order of receipt and will generally only permit criteria changes

to incorporate new safety information. Conversely, Part D sponsors are not required to receive

CMS approval in order to make their existing utilization management criteria less restrictive.

For example, when sponsors are modifying their criteria to indicate coverage for new medically-accepted indications or removing certain diagnostic criteria, the sponsors are not required to

notify CMS of such mid-year changes. However, even though there is no notice requirement,

sponsors must still submit the appropriate updated utilization management criteria document

reflecting the formulary enhancements during the next available HPMS formulary upload

window.

History

(Rev. 3, Issued: 09-05-08, Effective: 09-01-08, Implementation: 09-01-08)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-17
Edition
iom-2026-09-17
Content hash
11010eb4740b859e5a9c209c52334f8733760ed12dbfe67a400d6d86476a2e8c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.