US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-18, ch. 14, § 50.14.4
Resolution Directly with Other Non-Part D Payers
The plan-to-plan reconciliation process resolves those situations in which a Part D sponsor
other than the sponsor of record paid claims for a beneficiary during the initial transition
period. However, situations will continue to arise outside the plan-to-plan process in which
other payers that are not Part D sponsors either pay when they should not have paid at all, or
pay more than they should have, because they paid out of the correct payer order. In these
situations, Part D sponsors are required to work with these providers of other prescription
drug coverage to resolve these types of payment issues. Other payers, as well as
beneficiaries, are entitled to seek compensation from the Part D sponsor once the Part D
enrollment is confirmed.
Therefore, sponsors should implement processes to handle payment resolution directly with
other Non-Part D payers, beneficiaries, and others who are holding receivables on the
beneficiaries’ behalf without seeking recovery from pharmacies. Sponsors may not restrict
the payment resolution process by imposing timely filing requirements on these other parties
that are more restrictive than the timeframe required in Federal regulations at § 423.466(b).
This provision, revised in the February 2015 F inal Rule (80 FR 7912) requires Part D
sponsors to coordinate benefits with SPAPs and other entities providing prescription drug
coverage, beneficiaries and others paying on the beneficiaries’ behalf for a period 36 months
from the date on which the prescription for a covered Part D drug was filled.
In instances when Medicaid has paid for a covered Part D drug and then seeks
49
reimbursement from Part D, the sponsor should handle the Medicaid subrogation as follows:
3. Refund Medicaid the lesser of the sponsor’s out-of-network pharmacy allowed
amount or the amount sought by Medicaid.
4. Apply no beneficiary cost-sharing or low-income subsidy to the claim.
The pharmacy-initiated reverse and rebill approach supports only a portion of the retroactive
claims adjustments a Part D sponsor must handle. Therefore, sponsors must work directly
with other payers to resolve reimbursements and recoveries for the majority of retroactive
claims adjustments. Resolution of these latter adjustment actions becomes more complex by
the absence of the other payers’ amount paid on the N transaction to the Part D plan. In
order to ensure the confidentiality of pharmacy pricing information, coordination of benefits
on initial claims is accomplished by reporting to the Part D sponsor only the amount of the
beneficiary’s payment after the supplemental payment.
As a result, a Part D sponsor attempting to determine refund or recovery amounts without
having the pharmacy reverse and rebill the original claim must calculate the amount of any
supplemental payment made by another payer by determining the difference between the
Part D cost-sharing and the beneficiary amount paid after the supplemental payment. While
CMS acknowledges that electronic transaction standards are not yet available to support
timely, reliable, and precise coordination on adjusted claims when multiple payers are
involved, it continues to hold sponsors accountable for making best efforts to coordinate
benefits generated by claim adjustments.
History
(Rev. 17, Issued: 08 -23-13, Effective Date: 06-07-10, Imple mentation Date : 01-01-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- iom-2026-09-17
- Content hash
3b3c5e958558212e799b44272ac50fb46508bc3356d74594d28a54994af91bd1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.