US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 21, § 50.6.9
Use of Data Analysis for Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention
and Detection
(Chapter 21 - Rev. 109, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07- 20-12)
(Chapter 9 - Rev. 15, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07-20- 12)
42 C.F.R. §§ 422.503(b)(4)(vi)(F), 423.504(b)(4)(vi)(F)
Sponsors must perform effective monitoring in order to prevent and detect FWA.
Sponsors may accomplish this through the use of data analysis. Data analysis should
include the comparison of claim information against other data (e.g., provider, drug or
medical service provided, diagnoses or beneficiaries) to identify unusual patterns
suggesting potential errors and/or potential fraud and abuse. Data analysis should factor
in the particular prescribing and dispensing practices of providers who serve a particular
population (e.g., long term care providers, assisted living facilities, etc.). Use of data
analysis may include monitoring pharmacy and medical billing to detect unusual patterns.
Sponsors may invest in data analysis software applications that give them the ability to
analyze large amounts of data to detect FWA both internally and externally. Data
analysis should:
• Establish baseline data to enable the sponsor to recognize unusual trends, changes
in drug utilization over time, physician referral or prescription patterns, and plan
formulary composition over time;
• Analyze claims data to identify potential errors, inaccurate TrOOP accounting,
and provider billing practices and services that pose the greatest risk for potential
FWA to the Medicare program;
• Identify items or services that are being over utilized;
• Identify problem areas within the plan such as enrollment, finance, or data
submission;
• Identify problem areas at the FDR (e.g., PBM, pharmacies, pharmacists,
physicians, other health care providers and suppliers); and
• Use findings to determine where there is a need for a change in policy.
Sponsors should develop indicators that will be used to identify norms, abnormalities,
and individual variables that describe statistically significant time-series trends. Examples
include:
• Standard deviations from the mean;
• Percent above the mean or median; and
• Percent increase in charges, number of visits/services from one period to another.
Sponsors should routinely generate and review reports on pharmacy billing, medical
claims, etc., based upon the data analysis performed to identify pharmacies and other
FDRs that require further review.
History
(Chapter 21 - Rev. 109, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07- 20-12)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
9f5e28e18c9829352abcaa9c47052300ff9f46a38bf8c0df30d344478c627dc5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.