Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 21, § 50.6.4

Audit Schedule and Methodology

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

42 C.F.R. §§ 422.503(b)(4)(vi)(F), 423.504(b)(4)(vi)(F)

The work plan must include a schedule that lists all of the monitoring and auditing

activities for the calendar year. Sponsors may want to organize the schedule by month or

quarter.

Sponsors must audit their operational areas and those of their first tier entities. It is a best

practice for sponsors to use a combination of desk and on-site audits, including, as

appropriate and as permitted by contractual agreements, unannounced audits or “spot

checks” when developing the work plan. On-site audits provide the auditor an

opportunity to assess the on-site operations, interview staff, and gain a better

understanding of the performance of the area under review.

Sponsors should prepare a standard audit report that includes items such as:

• Audit Objectives;

• Scope and Methodology;

• Findings:

o Condition;

o Criteria;

o Cause;

o Effect; and

• Recommendations

In developing the types of audits to include in the work plan sponsors must:

• Determine which risk areas will most likely affect the sponsor, and prioritize the

monitoring and audit strategy accordingly;

• Utilize appropriate methods in:

o Selecting sponsor facilities, pharmacies, providers, claims, and other areas

for audit;

o Determining appropriate sample size;

o Extrapolating audit findings using statistically valid methods that comply

with generally accepted auditing standards to the full universe; and

o Applying targeted or stratified sampling methods driven by data mining

and complaint monitoring;

• Use special targeted techniques based on aberrant behavior;

• Assess compliance with internal processes and procedures;

• Examine the performance of the compliance program, including a review of

training, reporting mechanisms (e.g., hotline log), investigation files, OIG/GSA

exclusion list screenings, evidence of employee receipt of Standards of Conduct

and conflict of interest disclosures/attestations, and sampling for evidence in

support of attestations, if the sponsor uses attestations to monitor compliance; and

• Conduct follow up review by auditing, monitoring or otherwise of areas

previously found non-compliant to determine if the implemented corrective

actions have fully addressed the underlying problem.

History

(Chapter 21 - Rev. 109, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07- 20-12)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
49672cee6d8e368a1984e834588d1f2e790f4060c0a5a671ef59df67b30277c8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.