US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 21, § 50.2
Element II: Compliance Officer, Compliance Committee and
High Level Oversight
(Chapter 21 - Rev. 109, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07- 20-12)
(Chapter 9 - Rev. 15, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07-20- 12)
42 C.F.R. §§ 422.503(b)(4)(vi)(B), 423.504(b)(4)(vi)(B)
The sponsor must designate a compliance officer and a compliance committee who report
directly and are accountable to the sponsor’s chief executive or other senior management.
1. The compliance officer, vested with the day-to-day operations of the compliance
program, must be an employee of the sponsor, parent organization or corporate
affiliate. The compliance officer may not be an employee of an FDR.
2. The compliance officer and the compliance committee must periodically report
directly to the sponsor’s governing body on the activities and status of the
compliance program, including issues identified, investigated, and resolved by the
compliance program.
3. The sponsor’s governing body must be knowledgeable about the content and
operation of the compliance program and must exercise reasonable oversight with
respect to the implementation and effectiveness of the compliance program.
50.2.1 – Compliance Officer
(Chapter 21, Rev. 110, Issued:01-11-13, Effective:01-11-13; Implementation:01-11-13)
(Chapter 9, Rev. 16, Issued: 01-11-13, Effective: 01-11-13; Implementation: 01-11-13)
42 C.F.R. §§ 422.503(b)(4)(vi)(B), 423.504(b)(4)(vi)(B)
The compliance officer position should be full-time. The sponsor is not required to have a
separate compliance officer (“Medicare Compliance Officer”) dedicated only to its
Medicare Parts C and D business, although CMS strongly recommends a dedicated
Medicare compliance officer. Sponsors must assess the scope of the existing compliance
officer’s responsibilities, the size of the organization, and the organization’s resources
when determining whether a single compliance officer can effectively implement the
Medicare compliance program and the sponsor’s commercial or other governmental
business.
The compliance officer must be an employee of the sponsor (preferred) or of its parent
company or corporate affiliate. Sponsors may not delegate the compliance officer
position or compliance program functions to first tier or downstream entities. When the
compliance officer is not employed by the sponsor itself, but by the sponsor’s parent
company or corporate affiliate, the sponsor must ensure that the compliance officer has
detailed involvement in and familiarity with the sponsor’s operational and compliance
activities.
The sponsor must ensure that reports from the compliance officer reach the sponsor’s
senior-most leader (typically the CEO or President). The direct reporting relationship
between the compliance officer and the senior-most leadership refers to the direct
reporting of information, not necessarily to a supervisory reporting relationship. This can
be accomplished through a dotted line or matrix reporting.
The compliance officer must have express authority to provide unfiltered, in-person
reports to the sponsor’s senior-most leader. The compliance officer’s reports should not
be routed to the CEO or President through operational management such as the COO,
CFO, GC (General Counsel) or other executives responsible for operational areas. For
example, the compliance officer’s report to the CEO should not be filtered through the
CFO. However, the compliance officer’s reports may be relayed to the sponsor’s senior-most leader through divisional Presidents. For example, the compliance officer may
report directly to the President of the division that houses the Medicare program, who
then reports to the CEO of the sponsor on the status and activities of the Medicare
compliance program.
The compliance officer’s reports to the sponsor’s governing body must be made through
the compliance infrastructure. The compliance officer must have express authority to
provide unfiltered, in-person reports to the sponsor’s governing body at his/her
discretion.
The Medicare compliance officer may report compliance issues directly to the corporate
compliance officer and/or the compliance committee, who then provide compliance
reports directly to the sponsor’s governing body. The compliance officer, in his/her
discretion, need not await approval of the sponsor’s governing body to implement needed
compliance actions and activities, provided that those actions and activities, as
appropriate, are reported to the governing body or governing body committee at its next
scheduled meeting. It is a best practice for sponsors who have both a corporate
compliance officer and a Medicare compliance officer to allow the Medicare compliance
officer to regularly attend meetings of the sponsor’s governing body and to make in-person reports to the sponsor’s governing body. A related best practice is to allow the
compliance officer to meet in Executive Session with the governing body.
The compliance officer should be independent. The compliance officer should not serve
in both compliance and operational areas (e.g., where the compliance officer is also the
CFO, COO or GC). This leads to self-policing in the operational area(s) in which he/she
serves, which is a conflict of interest.
Because the compliance officer must be free to raise compliance issues without fear of
retaliation, it is a best practice to require governing body approval before the compliance
officer can be terminated from employment.
The compliance officer is responsible for the implementation of the compliance program.
The compliance officer defines the program structure, educational requirements,
reporting, and complaint mechanisms, response and correction procedures, and
compliance expectations of all personnel and FDRs.
The compliance officer should have training and/or experience working with MA, MA-PD or PDP programs and, with regulatory authorities. It is a best practice for the
compliance officer to be a member of senior management.
Duties of the compliance officer may include, but are not limited to:
• Ensuring that Medicare compliance reports are provided regularly to the sponsor’s
corporate compliance officer (if any), governing body, CEO, and compliance
committee. Reports should include the status of the sponsor’s Medicare
compliance program implementation, the identification and resolution of
suspected, detected or reported instances of noncompliance, and the sponsor’s
compliance oversight and audit activities;
• Being aware of daily business activity by interacting with the operational units of
the sponsor;
• Creating and coordinating, by appropriate delegation, if desired, educational
training programs to ensure that the sponsor’s officers, governing body,
managers, employees, FDRs, and other individuals working in the Medicare
program are knowledgeable about the sponsor’s compliance program, its written
Standards of Conduct, compliance policies and procedures, and all applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements;
• Developing and implementing methods and programs that encourage managers
and employees to report Medicare program noncompliance and potential FWA
without fear of retaliation;
• Maintaining the compliance reporting mechanism and closely coordinating with
the internal audit department and the SIU, where applicable;
• Responding to reports of potential FWA, including the coordination of internal
investigations with the SIU or internal audit department and the development of
appropriate corrective or disciplinary actions, if necessary. To that end, the
compliance officer should have the flexibility to design and coordinate internal
investigations;
• Ensuring that the DHHS OIG and Government Services Administration (“GSA”)
exclusion lists have been checked with respect to all employees, governing body
members, and FDRs monthly and coordinating any resulting personnel issues
with the sponsor’s Human Resources, Security, Legal or other departments as
appropriate;
• Maintaining documentation for each report of potential noncompliance or
potential FWA received from any source, through any reporting method (e.g.,
hotline, mail, or in-person);
• Overseeing the development and monitoring of the implementation of corrective
action plans;
• Coordinating potential fraud investigations/referrals with the SIU, where
applicable, and the appropriate NBI MEDIC. This includes facilitating any
documentation or procedural requests that the NBI MEDIC makes of the sponsor.
Similarly, the compliance officer should collaborate with other sponsors, State Medicaid
programs, Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MCFUs), commercial payers, and other
organizations, where appropriate, when a potential FWA issue is discovered that involves
multiple parties; and
• The compliance officer should have the authority to:
o Interview or delegate the responsibility to interview the sponsor’s employees
and other relevant individuals regarding compliance issues;
o Review company contracts and other documents pertinent to the Medicare
program;
o Review or delegate the responsibility to review the submission of data to CMS
to ensure that it is accurate and in compliance with CMS reporting
requirements;
o Independently seek advice from legal counsel;
o Report potential FWA to CMS, its designee or law enforcement;
o Conduct and/or direct audits and investigations of any FDRs;
o Conduct and/or direct audits of any area or function involved with Medicare
Parts C or D plans; and
o Recommend policy, procedure, and process changes.
History
(Chapter 21 - Rev. 109, Issued: 07-27-12, Effective: 07-20-12; Implementation: 07- 20-12)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
92cc009b8207dce31fc2d013f3259859e5b872b92b7b5068f7e04b5ad28577ff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.