US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c17b, § 340.3.3
Members of Religious Order Who Have Taken Vow of Poverty
Medicare is not secondary for individuals who perform services as members of a
religious order whose members are required to take a vow of poverty if those activities
are considered employment only because of an election of Social Security coverage by
the order under §3121(r) of the Internal Revenue Code. This means Medicare is primary
to the group health coverage provided as a result of those activities. Those activities may
not be considered in determining whether a member of the order is considered an
employed individual for purposes of the working aged provision.
This exception applies only to religious functionaries who are members of religious
orders and who have taken a vow of poverty. It does not apply to Protestant and Jewish
clergy, who do not take the vow of poverty. It does not usually apply to Catholic parish
priests, most of who do not take vows of poverty, nor does it apply to any member of a
religious order who has not taken a vow of poverty. Furthermore, the exception does not
apply to group health coverage based on work performed by members of religious orders
for employers outside of their orders. Also, the MSP definition of “employed” remains
applicable to employees of religious orders who provide service and are reimbursed by
the orders, but who are not themselves members of the orders. The usual MSP rules apply
to such individuals.
History
(Rev. 4, 10-01-01)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
12b680b61c200246211df5fbcb0b95d07d15a8b72b56b6fa7b261f4c9aeb7ac8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.