Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16b, § 90.2.1

Additional Considerations

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

14 VSAC is a repository for clinical coding vocabularies that define clinical concepts to support interoperable health

information exchange, and is provided by the National Library of Medicine in collaboration with the Office of the

National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and CMS.

Equity & Accessibility

CMS encourages SNPs to consider equity issues in selecting screening instruments and

questions, including the questions required by 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i). In particular, SNPs

should consider whether the instrument has been validated for racial and ethnic minority

populations that the SNP serves and whether the instrument can be translated into languages

that are commonly spoken by the SNP’s enrollees. In addition, SNPs should consider

whether they can provide the questions in accessible formats using auxiliary aids and

services as required by section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and implementing

regulations at 45 CFR Part 92. These regulations require plans to provide appropriate

auxiliary aids and services, including interpreters and information in alternate formats, to

individuals with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills where necessary to afford such

persons an equal opportunity to benefit from the service.

Questions from Multiple Assessment Instruments

SNPs are not required to adopt any of these screening instruments wholesale. SNPs must

adopt one or more questions related to each of the required three domains specified in 42

CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) in their HRAs. SNPs do not need to select questions on the three

required domains from just one assessment instrument. For example, a SNP may choose one

question from a particular screening instrument on food security, and a question on housing

stability from another screening instrument. This also applies to state-required assessment

instruments. For example, if a SNP uses a state-required assessment that includes questions

about housing stability and food security, but does not include any questions about access to

transportation, the SNP must still include a question on access to transportation in its HRA

and therefore must select one or more questions on access to transportation from an

assessment instrument specified by CMS in this guidance.

Assessment Instruments with Multiple Questions on the Same Domain

There may be instances where an instrument includes multiple questions in the required

domains. For example, an assessment instrument may include a question about housing

instability as well as a question about quality of housing—both of which pertain to the

required housing stability domain. If an instrument includes more than one question for a

domain and a SNP elects to screen for that domain using that instrument, CMS strongly

encourages the SNP adopt all of the questions for that domain in their health risk assessment.

Validated assessment instruments with multiple questions on the same domain have been

validated as a panel of questions and may be less accurate at screening an enrollee for a

particular need when only one question from that panel is used. However, a SNP can comply

with 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) even if the plan does not use the full suite of questions on a

domain from a particular screening instrument.

History

(Rev. 129; Issued: 08-11-23; Effective: 01-01-24; Implementation: 01-01-24)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
7ef0e1085b4d283b4eef3616df5051d05d8ef5d1f54ce8596522d7b2d470bd50
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.