US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16b, § 90.2
Instruments for Screening for Housing Stability, Food Security, and
Access to Transportation
(Rev. 129; Issued: 08-11-23; Effective: 01-01-24; Implementation: 01-01-24)
SNPs can meet the requirement at 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) in one of two ways:
1. Use a state-required screening instrument that includes questions on the required
domains.
As discussed in the CY 2023 MA and Part D Final Rule (87 FR 27734), SNPs can use state-required Medicaid screening instruments that include questions on housing stability, food
security, and access to transportation to satisfy the HRA content requirement in 42 CFR
422.101(f)(1)(i). By allowing SNPs to use the questions in state-required screening
instruments, we aim to prevent duplication of screening efforts. For the purposes of this
requirement, SNPs that are required by a state to use a certain screening instrument in the
same contract year may use that state-required instrument to meet this requirement. For
example, a SNP required by a state to use an assessment instrument in CY 2024 that includes
questions on these domains could use that instrument to meet the requirement at 42 CFR
422.101(f)(1)(i) for CY 2024.
In addition, CMS recognizes that SNPs operating in a particular state that are not subject to
state assessment requirements (e.g., chronic condition special needs plans [C-SNPs] and
institutional special needs plans [I-SNPs] are not required to have contracts with states) may
wish to use an assessment instrument a state requires for dual eligible special needs plans (D-SNPs) to satisfy the requirement at 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) if that instrument includes
questions in the three required domains. C-SNPs and I-SNPs may use such a state-required
assessment instrument to meet this requirement as long as the state requires that instrument
for D-SNPs in the same state in the same contract year, as outlined above. For example, a C-
SNP operating in a state that requires D-SNPs to use a certain assessment instrument in CY
2025 may use that state-specified instrument to meet the 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i)
requirement to include questions in the specified domains in CY 2025 so long as that
instrument includes the questions in the three required domains. Such SNPs may use
questions on the three required domains from a state-required assessment as part of their
10 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-05-09/pdf/2022-09375.pdf
HRA without using the entire state-required assessment (i.e., adding questions on the three
domains to the SNP’s own existing HRA instrument).
Finally, SNPs may use state-required screening instruments for plans whose service areas
include a state that requires a particular state-specific screening instrument. For example, a
SNP plan benefit package whose service area encompasses the Kansas City metro area could
include counties in both Missouri and Kansas. In this example, if Missouri required a certain
state-specific screening instrument and Kansas did not, the plan may use the Missouri state-required screening instrument for all enrollees in that service area, including those who reside
in Kansas.
While many states that require screening for these three domains are using validated
screening instruments, some state-required screening instruments may be state-specific and
not meet the standards described below (e.g. not a validated, health information technology
(IT)-encoded instrument). This could create a challenge for data standardization and
interoperability. However, CMS believes the need for flexibility outweighs this potential
challenge but may revisit this position in the future. We encourage SNPs to reach out to the
states in which they operate with any questions about state-specific screening requirements.
2. Select questions on the required domains from validated, health information
technology (IT)-encoded screening instruments.
Alternatively, if not using a state-required screening instrument, SNPs may select questions
from other validated, health IT-encoded screening instruments. Table 7 in section 90.1.2
specifies CMS’s list of social needs screening instruments from which SNPs must select
questions on the three required domains to meet the requirement at 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i)
if the SNP does not use a state-required screening instrument that includes questions on the
required topics (see Table 7 below).
CMS aimed to include validated, widely used screening instruments and considered the
availability of screening instruments, including whether they are proprietary or require a fee.
The list in Table 7 includes a number of screening instruments that are non-proprietary
and/or available at no cost. For those screening instruments that are proprietary, SNPs are
responsible for securing the necessary licenses to use the intellectual property of entities that
own these instruments and the questions as formulated in them.
In addition, use of the questions from a specific screening instrument specified by CMS must
be consistent with the instructions for the screening instrument for the SNP’s use of the
question(s) on housing, food security, and access to transportation to satisfy the SNP’s
obligations under 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i). CMS’s review of the questions on the screening
instruments specified in Table 7 has taken into account instructions and permissible
variations. Therefore, when the developer of a screening instrument allows users to make
certain adaptations (e.g., translation into other languages), SNPs should make changes
consistent with the screening instrument’s specifications or consult with the relevant
screening instrument developer to determine what adaptations may be acceptable and
whether such adaptations require permission from the instrument developer. SNPs may also
want to consult with the instrument developer to understand how any adaptations to the
instrument questions might affect their validity. 42 CFR 422.2267(a)(2) requires that MA
organizations must translate required materials, including HRAs, into any non-English
language that is the primary language of at least five percent of the individuals in a plan
benefit package service area. In addition, beginning for 2024, fully integrated and highly
integrated D-SNPs (and applicable integrated plans as defined in 42 CFR 422.561) must
translate required materials into the language(s) required by the Medicaid translation
standard specified in the capitated Medicaid managed care contract held by the D-SNP or its
affiliated Medicaid managed care plan.
In selecting the screening instruments from which a SNP may select questions to comply
with 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i), CMS applied the following criteria:11
• Screening instruments that are validated, widely used, and available. CMS
determined that the screening instruments the stakeholder-led Gravity Project has
identified as appropriate to screen for the each of the three required domains meet this
standard. The Gravity Project is a national public collaborative that convenes
stakeholders through an open and transparent collaborative process to develop and
test consensus-based standards to facilitate social determinants of health (SDOH) data
capture.12
• Screening instruments that maximize opportunities for SNPs to collect and
analyze standardized, quantifiable, and actionable data. CMS determined that, in
order to meet this standard, questions and responses in screening instruments should
be mapped to health IT vocabulary standards (i.e., have available LOINC® coding
terminology).
As described in the CY 2023 MA and Part D Final Rule, CMS considered the extensive work
various stakeholders have already done to research and validate screening instruments in
developing the above criteria. The above criteria align with the data elements established as
part of the United States Core Data for Interoperability, Version 2, in which LOINC® is
identified as an applicable vocabulary standard for SDOH assessments.13 By identifying
validated screening instruments that use available health IT coding terminology as acceptable
sources for the questions required by 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i), CMS aims to encourage
greater standardization of social needs screening data and facilitate interoperable exchange of
such data.
The screening instruments in Table 7 meet the above criteria at the time CMS updated this
11 Furthermore, Table 7 in section 90.1.2 also incorporates screening instruments included in the specification for the
National Committee for Quality Assurance’s (NCQA) Social Need Screening and Intervention” measure in HEDIS
Volume 2: Technical Specifications for Health Plans, 705-717.
12 The Gravity Project convenes subject matter experts to evaluate and vote on the validity and appropriateness of
available assessment instruments to screen for various domains. For the purposes of this requirement, we have
combined Gravity’s three housing-related domains (housing instability, homelessness, and inadequate housing) into
one topic (“housing stability”).
13 See the final USCDI v2 document: https://www.healthit.gov/isa/sites/isa/files/2021-07/USCDI-Version-2-July-
2021-Final.pdf.
section. However, the social needs screening field is evolving quickly, and screening
instruments that currently do not meet the criteria outlined above may meet those criteria in
the future (e.g., new LOINC® coding terminology may be created for a screening instrument
for which it was previously not available).
Therefore, in addition to the list of screening instruments specified in Table 7, SNPs can use
questions on the three required domains from screening instruments included in the Gravity
Project’s lists linked below of screening instruments by domain, which can be found in the
National Library of Medicine Value Set Authority Center (VSAC).14 The Gravity Project
compiles these lists to include screening instruments with available LOINC® coding that its
members have identified as appropriate to screen for each domain, and will update them if
and when new screening instruments meet these standards. CMS has determined the
assessment instruments on these lists meet the criteria described above and are permissible
for a SNP to draw from for the required questions on housing stability, food security, and
access to transportation. Please note that VSAC users must create an account and be logged
in to access the links below.
• Food Security: VSAC Food Insecurity Screening Assessments
• Housing Stability: VSAC Homelessness Screening Assessments; VSAC Housing
Instability Screening Assessments; VSAC Inadequate Housing Screening
Assessments
• Access to Transportation: VSAC Transportation Insecurity Screening Assessments
Currently, the screening instruments included in the VSAC are also listed in Table 7. In the
future, the VSAC lists may expand to include additional instruments that meet the above
criteria. CMS will review the VSAC resources linked above to ensure that questions on the
three domains are acceptable under 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i). SNPs may use questions from
assessment instruments included in this value set as of July 2023.
CMS Post-Acute Care (PAC) Assessment Instruments
Table 7 includes several CMS PAC assessment instruments that include a question on access
to transportation that is almost identical to a transportation question included in the Protocol
for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE)
assessment instrument, but has a small modification to the response choices. These
assessment instruments have been thoroughly tested, have associated LOINC coding to
collect standardized data, and are already in use by providers. SNPs may use them to meet
the requirement for including one or more questions on access to transportation in their
HRAs. More details about the CMS PAC assessment instruments can be found in the CMS
Data Element Library.
History
(Rev. 129; Issued: 08-11-23; Effective: 01-01-24; Implementation: 01-01-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
102deb1f3aac4a0cec684884ac00fbaf0e51963adb722859a42e1522e6384bb9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.