Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16b, § 40.2.3

Verification of Eligibility for I-SNPs/Level of Care Assessment for

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Institutional Equivalent SNPs

(Rev. 123, Issued: 08-19-16, Effective: 08-19-16, Implementation: 08-19-16)

When an individual elects to enroll in an I-SNP before she/he has received at least 90 days of

institutional LOC, the I-SNP may use a number of sources of information to show that the

individual’s condition makes it likely that either the length of stay or the need for an institutional

LOC will be at least 90 days. Examples of sources of information that CMS considers appropriate for

this purpose include: a state LOC assessment tool; current Minimum Data Set (MDS) data; or a letter

from the nursing facility on the organization’s letterhead stating that the nursing facility expects the

enrollee to require a stay in excess of 90 days.

Pursuant to section 1859(f)(2) of the Act, individuals living in the community may enroll in an I-SNP

only if they have been determined to need an institutional LOC. CMS permits I-SNPs serving

individuals living in the community who require an institutional LOC to restrict enrollment to those

individuals that reside in, or agree to reside in, a contracted assisted living facility (ALF) or

continuing care community, as this may be necessary to ensure uniform delivery of specialized care.

Use of an ALF or continuing care community is optional. If a community-based I-SNP limits

enrollment to individuals who reside in a specific ALF or continuing care community, a potential

enrollee must agree to reside in the MAO’s contracted ALF or continuing care community in order to

enroll in the SNP. The SNP must demonstrate the need for the limitation on enrollment, and must

describe how community resources will be organized and provided.

MAOs requesting to offer a new, or expand an existing, I-SNP to individuals living in the community

and requiring an institutional LOC must submit to CMS information via HPMS that pertains to:

• The state LOC assessment tool; and

• The entity performing the LOC assessments.

An entity unrelated to the MAO must perform the assessments. This independent entity may not be

an employee of the MAO or its parent organization, and must be an independent contractor or

grantee. In addition, the independent entity may not receive any kind of bonus or differential

payment for qualifying members for the SNP.

MAOs must submit this required information as a part of their SNP application. Applications for this

type of I-SNP are reviewed on a case-by-case basis for approval during the annual MA application

cycle. Refer to section 30 of this chapter for further information regarding the SNP application

submission.

History

(Rev. 123, Issued: 08-19-16, Effective: 08-19-16, Implementation: 08-19-16)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
67f8d0d30f761935d682602b852eb95ca37f8bb1ad7f3483bdad060b6268b968
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16b, § 40.2.3 — Verificatio… · binding.law