US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16b, § 20.2.9.1
Flexibility in EAC Operations
We encourage MA organizations to work with D-SNP enrollees and their representatives to establish
the most effective and efficient processes for enrollee engagement. The requirements at 42 CFR
422.107(f) are nonprescriptive on meeting frequency, location, format, enrollee recruitment and
training methods, use and adoption of telecommunications technology, or other parameters for
operation of the EACs.
This flexibility extends to the geographic scope of the EAC(s) within each state. For example, the
EAC could include enrollees from a D-SNP offered in a single county, or it could consist of enrollees
from D-SNPs offered in multiple counties. For instance, a MA organization that offers separate D-SNPs in Broward, Hillsborough, and Orange counties in Florida could establish one EAC that
convenes enrollees representative of each of these distinct regions via virtual communication
methods. Alternatively, the MA organization could establish separate EACs in each county or use a
combination of these approaches. Similarly, an MA organization that offers separate D-SNPs serving
full-benefit dually eligible individuals and partial-benefit dually eligible individuals in the same state
could solicit enrollee input through one or more EACs where separate committees might represent
specific eligibility groups.
5 Resources for Integrated Care and Community Catalyst, ‘‘Listening to the Voices of Dually Eligible Beneficiaries:
Successful Member Advisory Councils’’, 2019. Retrieved from:
https://www.resourcesforintegratedcare.com/Member_Engagement/Video/Listening_to_Voices_of_Dually_Eligible_Bene
ficiaries
History
(Rev. 131; Issued: 11-22-24; Effective: 11-22-24; Implementation: 11-22-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
9d9024d875bab1d56d41d03496e9400d54e959fbc1b806da35c6762e97c5ab3a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.