Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16a, § 60

Variations in Payment Rates to Providers

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

42 CFR 422.4(a)(3)(ii) and 42 CFR 422.216(a)

A PFFS plan cannot not vary the payment rates for a provider based on the utilization of

that provider's services, except under the following two circumstances:

• A PFFS plan may vary the payment rates for a provider based on the specialty of

the provider, the location of the provider, or other factors related to the provider

that are not related to utilization and do not violate the provider antidiscrimination

rules under 42 CFR 422.205; and

• A PFFS plan may also increase the payment rates for a provider based on

increased utilization of specified preventive or screening services.

All three types of PFFS plans (full, partial, and non-network plans) are still required to

establish uniform payment rates in their terms and conditions of payment for deemed

providers of all categories of Part A and Part B services and are required to pay these

deemed providers at least the Original Medicare rates or higher. However, plans also

have the flexibility to establish through signed contracts or agreements with specific

providers payment rates that are different than the rates listed in the terms and conditions

that would otherwise apply, as long as the variations in payment rates are not based on

utilization (as described above). As noted in section 40.1 of this chapter, providers with

signed contracts or agreements with a PFFS plan are considered direct-contracting

providers.

PFFS plans may vary payment rates for their direct-contracting providers as long as the

rates are not based on utilization, with the payment rates being effective according to the

terms of the contract or agreement between the plan and the provider. However, PFFS

plans must continue to establish uniform payment rates for deemed providers in their

terms and conditions of payment. As noted in section 40.2 of this chapter, all deemed

providers have the right to decide, on a patient-by-patient and visit-by-visit basis, whether

to treat plan members unless the provider becomes a direct-contracting provider by

entering into a signed contract or agreement with the plan to see plan members over a

certain period of time.

Example 1: PFFS plans may utilize the flexibility to establish provider-specific payment

rates to encourage participation by providers who otherwise would not have agreed to

accept the payment rates listed in the terms and conditions of payment. For example, a

PFFS plan that lists a payment rate of 100% of Original Medicare for cardiology services

in the terms and conditions of payment that apply to deemed providers can establish a

higher provider-specific payment rate (e.g., 110% of Original Medicare) through a signed

contract or agreement to encourage a provider in a rural area to provide these services.

Example 2: A PFFS plan that intends to increase payment rates to a provider based on

increased utilization of specified preventive or screening services may establish the rates

in its signed contracts or agreements with direct-contracting providers and/or in the terms

and conditions of payment for deemed providers. The plan may also choose to apply this

policy on a provider-by-provider basis.

PFFS plans must maintain a record of all provider-specific payment rates that they

negotiate with direct-contracting providers along with the final rates paid. PFFS plans

must also have the capacity to report this information to CMS or to an independent entity

contracted by CMS upon request.

Section 70 of this chapter discusses the payment rules for direct-contracting and deemed

providers in each of the three types of PFFS plans.

History

(Rev.99, Issued: 05-27-11, Effective: 05-27-11, Implementation: 05-27-11)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
09bf7e31b5f5e959cc3beb9f147fd625c134599aba902323edf27a2fb79d5b11
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.