US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. mc86c16a, § 30.2
Access Standards for Full and Partial Network Plans
42 CFR 422.114(a)(2)(ii)(A)
As discussed in section 30.1 of this chapter, a PFFS plan can meet the access to services
requirement with respect to a particular category of health care providers by establishing
signed contracts or agreements with a sufficient number and range of providers to meet
the access standards described in section 1852(d)(1) of the Act. Section 1852(d)(1) of the
Act describes the requirements that MA organizations offering a coordinated care plan
(CCP) must meet when selecting providers to furnish benefits covered under the plan.
The access standards for CCPs are described in 42 CFR 422.112(a) and section 110.1 of
Chapter 4 of this manual.
Full and partial (only for the categories of providers for which the plan is using a network
of providers with signed contracts or agreements with the plan) network PFFS plans are
required to meet the same access standards as CCPs. Providers with signed contracts or
agreements with the plan are also known as direct-contracting providers or network
providers. CMS reviewers follow the same procedure when reviewing the Health Service
Delivery (HSD) Tables for initial and service area expansion applications for coordinated
care, PFFS, and network MSA plans in order to determine whether an MA organization’s
proposed network meets the access standards. Full and partial network plans must submit
information about their proposed provider networks to CMS. CMS reviews that
information as part of the application approval process to ensure that timely, accessible,
and appropriate care is provided.
History
(Rev. 99, Issued: 05-27-11, Effective: 05-27-11, Implementation: 05-27-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
f6b5eae78f98605e05e8f9bc7169f5158de03a1e2d6ba16952e47823612df215
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.