US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 11, § 20.3
Monitoring and Promoting Staff and Affiliated Provider
Compliance with Policies
(Rev. 79, Issued 02-17-06, Effective Date 02-17-06)
The organization should monitor compliance through analysis of complaints or
grievances, requests to change providers, enrollee satisfaction surveys, rapid
disenrollment surveys, and other sources of enrollee input. Issues in compliance should
be addressed through education or counseling of the staff or providers or other corrective
action, and information on compliance with the policies should be considered during the
recredentialing and staff evaluation process and within the quality improvement program.
The organization ensures compliance with Federal and State laws affecting the rights of
enrollees.
Applicable Federal laws include, but are not limited to:
• Federal laws and regulations designed to prevent or ameliorate fraud, waste, and
abuse to include but not limited to:
- Applicable provisions of Federal criminal law;
- The False Claims Act (31 U. S.C. 3729 et seq.);
- The Anti-Kickback statute (§1128B(b) of the Act); and
• HIPAA administrative simplification rules at 45 CFR Parts 160, 162, and 164.
In general, agencies other than CMS or the State Medicaid Agency enforce these laws,
and reviews conducted under these standards will not include detailed assessment of an
organization's compliance. However, CMS or States will report any observed violations
and refer any enrollee complaints to the appropriate agency for resolution.
The organization must include provisions relating to compliance with Federal and State
laws in subcontracts with providers. Assessment of compliance should be included in the
organization's credentialing procedures to the extent feasible and appropriate. For
example, if site visits to individual providers' offices are conducted, they should include a
general assessment of physical accessibility. Compliance issues identified may be
addressed through the organization's Quality Improvement Program.
Each MA contract is for a period of at least 12 months. The contract is effective on the
date specified in the contract between the MA organization and CMS.
An MA organization's MA contract with CMS will contain a provision specifying
inspection and auditing rights, along with CMS' rights to inspect or evaluate the quality,
appropriateness, and timeliness of services performed under the contract; CMS' rights to
inspect or evaluate the facilities of the organization when evidence of the need to do so
exists; and CMS' right to inspect books, contracts, and records of the MA organization
that pertain to the organization's ability to bear financial risk, perform services, and
determine amounts payable.
An MA organization's MA contract will contain a severability provision that provides
that upon CMS' request: (1) The contract will be amended to exclude any MA plan or
State-licensed entity specified by CMS, and (2) A separate contract would be deemed to
be in place for the plan removed from the MA contract, when such a request is made.
An MA organization's MA contract will contain a provision stating that any regulations
or policy statements issued by CMS after the date on which final bid proposals must be
submitted for a calendar year, and which create significant new operational costs of
which the MA organization did not have reasonable notice prior to such date, will not
become effective before the next contract year for which these requirements can be taken
into account in making bid submissions, unless earlier implementation is required by
statute or in connection with litigation challenging CMS” policies.
NOTE: MA organizations offering prescription drug benefits under Part D must
follow the fraud, waste, and abuse requirements at 42 CFR Part 423.
Please see §423.504(b)(4)(vi)(H) for these requirements.
History
(Rev. 79, Issued 02-17-06, Effective Date 02-17-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
fe70215b7d3cc75e335325e38de89fe46694f15a51ba4675014ac9a349910eb4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.