US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 7, § 70
Risk Adjustment Models - Overview
The CMS-HCC risk adjustment models are used to calculate risk scores, which predict
individual beneficiaries’ health care expenditures, relative to the average beneficiary.
Risk scores are used to adjust payments and bids based on the health status (diagnostic
data) and demographic characteristics (such as age and gender) of an enrollee. Both the
Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug programs include risk adjustment as a
component of the bidding and payment processes. CMS uses risk adjustment to:
• Standardize bids so that each plan has a bid for the average Medicare beneficiary
• Compare bids based on populations with different health statuses and other
characteristics
• Adjust plan payment based on the characteristics of the enrolled population
CMS has developed separate risk adjustment models for the Parts A and B benefits
offered by plans under Part C and for the Part D benefits offered by prescription drug
plans. Within each benefit, CMS also developed segments of the models for
subpopulations with distinct cost patterns.
The Part C model has segments for the following subpopulations of beneficiaries:
• Aged/disabled Community
• Aged/disabled Institutional
• Aged/disabled New enrollee
• ESRD Dialysis
• ESRD Dialysis New Enrollee
• ESRD Transplant
• ESRD Functioning Graft – Community
o Add-on for 4-9 months
o Add-on for 10+ months
• ESRD Functioning Graft – Institutional
o Add-on for 4-9 months
o Add-on for 10+ months
• ESRD Functioning Graft – New Enrollee
o Add-on for 4-9 months
o Add-on for 10+ months
From 2006 through 2010, the Part D model uses a base model with multipliers for:
• Low Income (partial)
• Low Income (full)
• Long Term Institutional (aged)
• Long Term Institutional (disabled)
Starting in 2011, the Part D model has the following segments:
• Aged, non-low income
• Aged, low income
• Disabled, non-low income
• Disabled, low income
• Institutional
• New Enrollee, non-low income
• New Enrollee, low income
• New Enrollee, institutional
Table 2 below summarizes the common characteristics across all HCC-based risk
adjustment models.
Table 2. HCC Specific Characteristics
Characteristic Descriptions
Selected Significant
Disease (SSD)
Model
Model considers serious manifestations of a condition rather than all levels
of severity of a condition.
Include most body systems and conditions.
Models are Additive Individual risk scores are calculated by adding the coefficients associated
with each beneficiary’s demographic and disease factors.
Prospective Model Uses diagnostic information from a base year to predict Medicare benefit
costs for the following year.
Site Neutral Models do not distinguish payment based on a site of care.
Diagnostic Sources Models recognize diagnoses from hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, and
physician settings.
Multiple Chronic
Diseases Considered
Risk adjusted payment is based on assignment of diagnoses to disease
groups, also known as Condition Categories (CCs).
Model is most heavily influenced by Medicare costs associated with chronic
disease.
Hierarchies Condition Categories are placed into hierarchies, reflecting severity and
cost dominance. Beneficiaries get credit for the disease with the highest
severity or that subsumes the costs of other diseases. Hierarchies allow for
payment based on the most serious conditions when less serious conditions
also exist.
Disease and
Disabled
Interactions
Interactions allow for higher risk scores for certain conditions when the
presence of another disease or demographic status, e.g., disabled status, is
indicative of higher costs. Disease interactions are additive factors and
increase payment accuracy.
Demographic
Variables
Models include five demographic factors: age, sex, disabled status, original
reason for entitlement, Medicaid or low income status.
These factors are typically measured as of the data collection period.
70.1 - Calibration of the CMS-HCC Risk Adjustment Models
(Rev. 118; Effective: ICD-10: Upon Implementation of ICD-10, ASC X12: January 1, 2012 (for ASC X12 5010); Implementation: ICD-10: Upon Implementation of ICD-10,
ASC X12: January 1, 2012 (for ASC X12 5010))
The CMS-HCC risk adjustment model is used to adjust payments for Part C benefits
offered by MA plans and PACE organizations to aged/disabled beneficiaries. The CMS-HCC model includes both diseases and demographic factors. There are separate sets of
coefficients for beneficiaries in the community, beneficiaries in long term care
institutions, and new enrollees. The CMS-HCC model was first used for payment in
2004 and has been recalibrated two times since then (2007 and 2009).
When CMS recalibrates the CMS-HCC risk adjustment model, it uses data from fee-for-service (FFS) claims, using one year’s diagnoses to predict the following year’s
expenditures. When developing the model, CMS consulted with a panel of outside
clinicians to review the diagnosis codes in order to group them with other clinically
similar diagnosis codes. These diagnosis groupings were then mapped to condition
categories based on similar clinical characteristics and severity, and cost implications.
Both the panel of clinicians and analyses of cost data informed the creation of condition
categories.
Coefficients for condition categories were estimated by regressing the total expenditure
for Medicare Parts A and B benefits for each beneficiary onto their demographic factors
and condition categories, as indicated by their diagnoses. Resulting dollar coefficients
represent the marginal (additional) cost of the condition or demographic factor (e.g.,
age/sex group, Medicaid status, disability status).
While all diagnosis codes are mapped to a condition category, not all condition categories
are included in the model used in payment. The decision to include a condition category
in the model is based on each category’s ability to predict costs for Medicare Parts A and
B benefits. Condition categories that don’t predict costs well – because the coefficient is
small, the t-value is low, the number of beneficiaries with a certain condition is small so
the coefficient is unstable, or the condition does not have well specified diagnostic coding
– are not included in the model.
In a final step, hierarchies were imposed on the condition categories, assuring that more
advanced and costly forms of a condition are reflected in the risk score.
In order to use the risk adjustment model to calculate risk scores for payment, CMS
creates a relative factor for each demographic factor and HCC in the model. CMS does
this by dividing all the dollar coefficients by the average per capita predicted expenditure
for a specific year (i.e., the “denominator year”). See Table 3 below for a list of data
years and denominator years in each version of the risk adjustment model. The relative
factors are used to calculate risk scores for individual beneficiaries, which will average
1.0 in the denominator year for the FFS population.
Each time the risk adjustment model is recalibrated, the relative factors can change.
Changes in the dollar coefficients resulting from the regression – the marginal cost
attributable to an HCC – can change relative to the average cost. For example, the
coefficient for diabetes can increase, reflecting higher costs for the disease; but if the
average cost for Medicare beneficiaries has increased even more than for diabetes, then
the relative cost of diabetes will decrease. This decrease in relative cost will be reflected
in a decrease in the relative factor, even though the costs associated with diabetes have
increased.
Although recalibrated models retain an average 1.0 risk score, individual beneficiaries’
risk scores may change, as may plan average risk scores, depending on each individual
beneficiaries’ combination of diagnoses.
Table 3. Data Years and Denominator Years
Payment Years Diagnoses Year Costs Year Denominator Year
2004, 2005, 2006 1999 2000 2000
2007, 2008 2002 2003 2005
2009, 2010, 2011 2004 2005 2007
History
(Rev. 114, Issued; 06-07-13, Effective: 06- 07-13, Implementation: 06-07-13)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
6efca20a6809cfab2690cc335cc9ac99cbf9dba09d78bd0073ee9b0ddae3705d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.