US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 7, § 120.2.5
Tips for Reducing Duplicate Diagnosis Cluster Errors
As part of the requirement that plans submit accurate risk adjustment data, CMS requires
that plans work to minimize the submission of duplicate diagnosis clusters. CMS
considers a plan submission that contains 5% or greater duplicate diagnosis clusters to be
a high level of duplicate submissions and to be in violation of the requirement to submit
accurate data.
Failure to submit accurate and timely risk adjustment production files may result in: 1)
incorrect payments to your MA organization; 2) loss of monthly prospective revenue
relating to beneficiary-health status; 3) payment recovery through a lump-sum recovery;
4) cessation of monthly payments throughout the remainder of a coverage year; and/or 5)
adjusting payments in a subsequent year. Non-compliance with these requirements may
result in CMS restricting future risk adjustment submissions by your MA organization.
Table 23, below, provides tips to assist plan sponsors in tracking diagnosis clusters so
that they can be compliant with the guidance on the 5 percent benchmark for duplicate
diagnosis cluster errors. CMS communicates to submitters a 502-error code for each
diagnosis cluster that shares the same attributes as one previously submitted and stored in
the RAPS database. CMS reviews files weekly and identifies diagnosis clusters; each
502-error code counts toward the 5 percent benchmark. If the submitter is a third party
and the file contains records for multiple plans, the review will occur at the plan level
within the file.
Table 23. Tips for Ensuring Compliance with the 5 Percent Benchmark
for Duplicate Diagnosis Cluster Error Guidance
Tips Description
Identify a
Duplicate
Diagnosis Cluster
CMS defines a Duplicate Diagnosis Cluster as one that shares all of
the same attributes (HIC Number, Provider Type, From and Through
Dates and Diagnosis) as one previously submitted and stored in the
RAPS database.
Review Reports
Review current and previous RAPS Return Files to determine which
clusters RAPS stored. If RAPS stored the cluster, MA organizations
should not resubmit.
Understand Error
Resolution
300-Level Errors
Resubmit all clusters associated with the record, this would not
create a duplicate diagnosis because none of the records were
previously stored.
400-Level Errors
Only resubmit the specific cluster that resulted in the 400-level error
message. Do not resubmit all clusters within the record, only the
clusters that contain errors.
Understanding
Modifying Data
MA organizations should only resubmit the diagnosis clusters that
require a modification.
For example, an MA organization submits eight clusters, and the
following week the organization notices the date of service submitted
was incorrect in one of the clusters, the organization must submit that
specific cluster with a “D” in the delete indicator field, and submit a
new cluster with the correct date.
Resubmitting all of the remaining seven clusters would create seven
duplicates.
120.2.6 - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
(Rev. 118; Effective: ICD-10: Upon Implementation of ICD-10, ASC X12: January 1, 2012 (for ASC X12 5010); Implementation: ICD-10: Upon Implementation of ICD-10,
ASC X12: January 1, 2012 (for ASC X12 5010))
Effective October 16, 2003, when HIPAA transaction standards became mandatory, all
electronic claims/encounters sent from providers/physicians to MA organizations (health
plans) constitute a HIPAA covered transaction. Any MA organization that receives an
electronic claim/encounter from a provider/physician must use the current applicable
ASC X12 837 format.
MA organizations cannot request that a physician resubmit data previously submitted
(same patient, same diagnosis) using a different format (e.g., HCFA 1500) if the
physician initially submits data in ASC X12 professional format for purposes of risk
adjustment data collection.
In accordance with Final Rule 45 CFR Part 152, effective March 17, 2009, CMS adopted
X12 Version 5010 for HIPAA transactions. The final rule mandates covered entities MA
organizations (health plans) comply no later than January 1, 2012.
History
(Rev. 114, Issued; 06-07-13, Effective: 06- 07-13, Implementation: 06-07-13)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
fe52848f51ddf5fb0c9ed8637ba384db88af2213edbb02279e1039a25ccfd919
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.