US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-16, ch. 6, § 50
Provider Anti-Discrimination
Consistent with the requirements of this section, the policies and procedures concerning
provider selection and credentialing, and the requirement that all Medicare-covered
services be available to all MA plan enrollees, an MA organization may select the
practitioners that participate in its plan provider networks. In selecting these
practitioners, an MA organization may not discriminate, in terms of participation,
reimbursement, or indemnification, against any health care professional who is acting
within the scope of his or her license or certification under state law, solely on the basis
of the license or certification.
If an MA organization declines to include a given provider or group of providers in its
network, it must furnish written notice to the affected provider(s) on the reason for the
decision.
This prohibition does not preclude any of the following actions by an MA organization:
1. Refusal to grant participation to health care professionals in excess of the number
necessary to meet the needs of the plan’s enrollees (except for MA private-fee-for-service plans, which may not refuse to contract on this basis).
2. Use of different reimbursement amounts for different specialties or for different
practitioners in the same specialty.
3. Implementation of measures designed to maintain quality and control costs
consistent with its responsibilities.
(Source: 42 CFR 422.205)
History
(Rev. 24, 06-06-03)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
b341f02741cade529341d08a1cce7c89fcf478a10a8cb908b09506d5a7d05ead
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.