US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-11, ch. 10, § 30
Additional Quality Assessment Activities
An essential component of an effective quality improvement program is risk assessment
and management. Risk management entails identifying and systematically reducing
potential risks to the safety of PACE participants and the healthcare environment. Risk
assessment ideally is conducted prospectively to prevent occurrences that result in
adverse health outcomes to participants or staff, or harm to the organization’s physical
plant/equipment or fiscal status. In reality, risk assessment is most often conducted in
response to an event that results in medical, psychosocial, cognitive, or functional harm
to a participant or staff. Every person employed or contracted by the PACE organization
has responsibility for risk assessment and management.
External monitoring activities refer to both:
• The submission of the aggregated monitoring data elements via the PACE
monitoring module of the Health Plan Management System (HPMS) Level One
Reporting; and
• The reporting of events resulting in significant harm to participants, or negative
national or regional notoriety related to the PACE program (Level Two
Reporting).
This manual and the PACE Level Two External Reporting Guidance (the “Level Two
Guidance”) clarify the Level Two reporting events that must be expeditiously reported to
CMS.
[42 CFR § 460.140; Level Two Guidance, October 2010]
History
(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11; Effective: 06-03-11; Implementation: 06-03-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
4991258cd2b25674568f0f9f459cc97fb3ff481b876e0681d00823b35eda99c6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.