Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-11, ch. 10, § 20

QAPI Program

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The PACE organization must develop, implement, maintain, and evaluate an effective

data-driven QAPI program. It is important that the QAPI program reflects the full range

of services furnished by the PACE organization. In developing the QAPI program, the

PACE organization should use organizational data to identify and improve areas of poor

performance. The PACE organization must take actions that result in improvements in its

performance in all types of care.

Currently, CMS does not require the use of a common quality assessment tool or a set of

specific outcome measures beyond the data elements for monitoring included in the

program agreement. PACE organizations have the flexibility to develop the QAPI

program that best meets their needs in order that they may fully meet the obligations of

care for its participants. It is CMS’s expectation that PACE organizations will operate a

continuous QAPI program that does not limit activity to only selected kinds of services or

types of patients. The desired outcome of the QAPI requirement is that data-driven

quality assessment serves as the engine that drives and prioritizes continuous

improvements for all the PACE organization’s services.

[42 CFR §§ 460 Preamble Discussion, 460.130; 71 FR 71305 (Dec. 8, 2006)]

History

(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11; Effective: 06-03-11; Implementation: 06-03-11)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
28e0b0a0ca0b4cf3f80f703aff4bd26ae04f4f4e4bb01e0aa06f264d5088dd5e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.