US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-11, ch. 1, § 20.5
Flexibility
The PACE regulation which established the requirements for PACE organizations is
based on the On Lok, Inc. Protocol. The Protocol provided authority for CMS and the
State Administering Agency (the State Agency designated to administer the PACE
program), to waive specific requirements of the Protocol, if, in their judgment, the
following criteria were met:
• The intent of the requirements were met by the proposed alternative and safe
and quality care would be provided;
• Written requests for waivers were required to be approved by CMS and the
State Administering Agency before implementation of the proposed
alternative.
CMS incorporated the requirement under the Protocol in the PACE regulations to the
extent consistent with the BBA provisions in Sections 1894 and 1934 of the Act. The
intention was to allow some flexibility to promote PACE in rural and Tribal areas while
maintaining consistency with the requirements for other PACE programs. The rationale
for limited view of the flexibility provisions was based on our belief that all PACE
demonstration programs were in compliance with the PACE protocol and, therefore,
would need to make only minor changes in their operations to meet the PACE regulatory
requirements. CMS intended to provide more flexibility to all PACE organizations once
sufficient experience in administering the PACE program was achieved. However, CMS
learned that although the early PACE demonstration programs initially complied with the
Protocol, most of them modified the Protocol requirements as they expanded, using the
flexibility authorized in the Protocol. While many of these modifications were related to
the allowable areas of service coverage and arrangement provisions, many others were
not authorized by the flexibility clause in the Protocol. Furthermore, many of the later
PACE demonstration programs also inappropriately exercised the flexibility clause in the
Protocol, especially with regard to direct employment of staff. Finally, very few of the
waivers were requested in writing or approved by CMS or the State Administering
Agency before implementation. Subsequently CMS revised regulations on the waiver
process in accordance with the requirements of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 (BIPA) (Pub. L. 106-554).
[64 FR 66302 (Nov. 24, 1999) and 67 FR 61496 (Oct. 1, 2002)]
History
(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11; Effective: 06-03-11; Implementation: 06-03-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
1e383b403cfde013dca388ebc01e4e47c8e051fb228c31b290e30ffdc91794f1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.