Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 9, § 9135

QIO Review Responsibilities – 60-Day Review

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The Regional Office DSC will notify the QIO of EMTALA cases that it is referring to OIG.

Before OIG can assess a CMP or exclude a physician from the Medicare program, the

QIO must review the case and provide a report of the findings to the originating Regional

Office, which is responsible for forwarding the report to OIG. The QIO review includes

offering the involved physician(s) and hospital(s) an opportunity to discuss the case and to

submit additional information before OIG may impose sanctions.

For the 60-Day EMTALA Review Process, the QIO will follow the Physician Peer Review

five (5)-day EMTALA Review Process described in §9130.2. In addition, the following

instructions also apply for the 60-day review process.

The QIO must provide a written notice of the opportunities to the affected

physician/hospital (see 42 CFR §489.24(h)(2)) and arrange the meeting either by

telephone or face-to-face. The letter should identify the name of the individual and the

date he/she presented to the emergency room. (See Appendix 9-16, 60-Day QIO Review-Opportunity for Discussion Model Letter.)

Notify OIG at the appropriate CMS Regional Office of the time and date the hospital and,

if applicable, the physician are meeting with the QIO, or notify OIG that the hospital and,

if appropriate, the physician have declined the opportunity to do so.

The hospital and/or the physician have the right to legal counsel present during the

meeting. However, the QIO may control the attorney’s scope, extent, and manner of any

questioning or any other presentation. The QIO may also have legal counsel present. The

QIO may reasonably limit the number of witnesses and length of testimony if such

testimony is irrelevant or repetitive. The QIO is not obligated to consider any additional

information that the hospital and/or the physician submit after the meeting, unless the QIO

requests them to submit additional information to support their assertions before the end

of the meeting. In this case, the QIO provides the hospital and/or the physician additional

time, not to exceed five (5) calendar days from the meeting, to submit the relevant

information. The QIO is required to keep a recording of the hospital and/or practitioner

meeting. However, it is not necessary to hire a professional stenographer to produce a

written transcript of the meeting. An audio recording is acceptable unless a written

transcript subsequently is requested by CMS Regional Office DSC or OIG.

If the hospital and/or practitioner(s) elect to discuss the case with the QIO during a formal

meeting, the QIO and physician peer reviewer WILL NOT provide a clinical opinion

about the case during this meeting.

If the hospital and/or practitioner request a copy of the QIO physician peer review five

(5)-day review results, they should be directed to contact the CMS Regional Office DSC,

which is responsible for addressing and fulfilling all requests for documents from the

hospital and/or physician involved in the case.

Considering all the information on the case, the QIO sends its 60-day physician review

worksheet along with pertinent documentation to the Regional Office DSC, who will

forward a copy to OIG.

History

(Rev. 24, Issued: 02-12-16, Effective: 03-14-16, Implementation: 03-14-16)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
7a38240b2ed1d081392f712e43125b445f86d813a63db6eee36deb65925257eb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.