Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 9, § 9130.1

Physician Reviewer Selection/Qualifications

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The QIO should select a physician to review the case who is a specialist (actively

practicing in his/her specialty and, whenever possible, board-certified) in either the

specialty of the physician who attended the patient or the specialty indicated by the

condition of the patient whose care is under review. Whenever possible, the physician

reviewer should practice in a similar setting as that of the physician who attended the

patient.

Select a physician who agrees in writing to conduct the review in accordance with the

requirements in §9130.2 and to testify as an expert witness, if necessary, to properly

adjudicate the case.

NOTE: A QIO is precluded from disclosing information that would identify a QIO

physician reviewer without his/her consent (42 CFR 480.133(a)(2)(iii)). Therefore, the

QIO must ensure that each physician reviewer is aware of the potential need to serve as

expert witnesses and, prior to review of cases, secure a statement of willingness to serve as

an expert witness to certify his/her availability for expert witness testimony. QIOs must

maintain a file containing the names of physician reviewers. Upon request from OIG,

QIOs must provide the names of individuals who reviewed specific medical records to

serve as expert witnesses.

History

(Rev. 24, Issued: 02-12-16, Effective: 03-14-16, Implementation: 03-14-16)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
6d2e60542d81a5c8b0b239ec1e481f116ca203204b4819ea47af53e88676b5a3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.