US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 9, § 9130.1
Physician Reviewer Selection/Qualifications
The QIO should select a physician to review the case who is a specialist (actively
practicing in his/her specialty and, whenever possible, board-certified) in either the
specialty of the physician who attended the patient or the specialty indicated by the
condition of the patient whose care is under review. Whenever possible, the physician
reviewer should practice in a similar setting as that of the physician who attended the
patient.
Select a physician who agrees in writing to conduct the review in accordance with the
requirements in §9130.2 and to testify as an expert witness, if necessary, to properly
adjudicate the case.
NOTE: A QIO is precluded from disclosing information that would identify a QIO
physician reviewer without his/her consent (42 CFR 480.133(a)(2)(iii)). Therefore, the
QIO must ensure that each physician reviewer is aware of the potential need to serve as
expert witnesses and, prior to review of cases, secure a statement of willingness to serve as
an expert witness to certify his/her availability for expert witness testimony. QIOs must
maintain a file containing the names of physician reviewers. Upon request from OIG,
QIOs must provide the names of individuals who reviewed specific medical records to
serve as expert witnesses.
History
(Rev. 24, Issued: 02-12-16, Effective: 03-14-16, Implementation: 03-14-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
6d2e60542d81a5c8b0b239ec1e481f116ca203204b4819ea47af53e88676b5a3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.