US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 9, § 9105
Authority Related to EMTALA
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), PL 99-272,
revised §1866, “Agreements with Providers of Services,” of the Social Security Act (the
Act), and added §1867, “Examination and Treatment for Emergency Medical Conditions
and Women in Active Labor.” The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (OBRA
89), PL 101-239, further refined the requirements of §1154, “Functions of Peer Review
Organizations, ”§§1866 and 1867 of the Act, and deleted the word “Active” from the title
of §1867.
Sections 1866 and 1867 prohibit hospitals with emergency departments from turning away
or transferring individuals without screening for emergency medical conditions and
stabilizing such conditions or transferring the individual if they lack the capability to
provide stabilizing treatment. Section 1867 also requires hospitals with specialized
capabilities, regardless of whether they also have emergency departments, to accept
appropriate transfers of individuals needing those capabilities, assuming there is capacity
at the time of the transfer request. Hospitals are required to maintain on-call lists of
physicians who will come to the hospital to provide stabilizing treatment. Both hospitals
and physicians who violate EMTALA requirements are subject to enforcement actions; in
the case of hospitals this may include both termination of its participation in Medicare as
well as civil monetary penalties. Physicians are subject to civil monetary penalties and
also potentially to exclusion from the Medicare program.
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA 90), PL 101-508, added
§1867(d)(3). This section, titled “Consultation with Quality Improvement
Organizations,” requires a 60-day QIO review related to EMTALA cases, unless the delay
would jeopardize the health or safety of individuals. The 5-day review is required before
CMS makes a compliance determination as part of the process of terminating a hospital’s
participation in Medicare; the 60-day review is required before OIG imposes civil
monetary penalties. The QIO review is to consider whether an individual had an
emergency medical condition; the appropriateness of a medical screen examination,
stabilizing treatment, or an appropriate transfer; and whether the individual’s condition
had been stabilized. For the 60-day review, the QIO must also offer the involved
physician(s) and hospital(s) an opportunity to discuss the case and submit additional
information before the QIO completes its review.
The following are applicable Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) references:
42 CFR §489.20.l – requires hospitals, as part of their agreement with the Medicare
program, (provider agreement) to comply with the EMTALA regulations at 42 CFR
§489.24.
42 CFR §489.20.m – requires a hospital to report to CMS or the State Survey Agency any
time it believes it received an inappropriate transfer of an individual with an unstable
emergency medical condition.
42 CFR §489.20.q – requires a hospital to post conspicuous signs specifying individuals’
EMTALA rights in its emergency department or other places that individuals entering the
emergency department are likely to notice.
42 CFR §489.20.r – requires transferring and receiving hospitals to maintain records of
transfers for 5 years; requires hospitals to maintain an on-call list of physicians to provide
stabilizing treatment for individuals with emergency medical conditions and to maintain a
log of each individual who comes to the emergency department.
42 CFR §489.24 – Explains the responsibilities of a hospital with an emergency room to
provide appropriate medical treatment to an individual who comes to an emergency
department. These responsibilities include an appropriate medical screening examination
within the capabilities of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary
services.
42 CFR §489.24(b) – Provides definitions used in §489.24.
42 CFR §489.24(d) – Explains the hospital’s responsibility to provide necessary
stabilizing treatment for any individual who comes to the emergency department (whether
eligible for Medicare benefits or not) and when the hospital determines that the individual
has an emergency medical condition.
42 CFR §489.24(f) – Explains recipient hospital responsibilities, regardless of whether or
not the recipient hospital has an emergency department. Includes the requirement to
accept appropriate transfers of individuals who require specialized capabilities or
facilities if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the individual.
42 CFR §489.24(g) – If a hospital fails to meet the requirements of 42 CFR §489.24 (a)–
(f), CMS may terminate the provider agreement in accordance with §489.53.
42 CFR §489.24(h)–(i) – Describes the QIO consultative role and obligations to CMS for
the 60-day review to provide a medical opinion to determine a physician’s or hospital’s
liability under §1867(d)(1) of the Act. 42 CFR §480.132 – Provides the general
requirements for disclosure of patient information.
42 CFR §480.133 – Provides the general requirements for disclosure of information about
Peer Review practitioners, reviewers, and institutions.
History
(Rev. 24, Issued: 02-12-16, Effective: 03-14-16, Implementation: 03-14-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
685fbf79d90fa005afd303b680fef89ffebf25a28aa8d101a3b86df3d7116592
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.