US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 9, § 9015.1.1
QIO Sanction Committee
To properly identify a violation and determine whether a practitioner or other person has
committed a gross and flagrant violation in one or more instances, or a substantial
violation in a substantial number of cases, the QIO should convene a Sanction Committee
to receive and review all cases initially identified as a violation meeting one of those
standards by a QIO peer reviewer. Use of a Sanction Committee ensures that consistent
standards and judgment are applied when the QIO identifies a gross and flagrant
violation in one or more instances, or a substantial violation in a substantial number of
cases.
The QIO Sanction Committee should comprise at least three QIO staff and/or board
members and include the Review Manager and Medical Director.
NOTE: No person who is part of the initial identification of a violation and indicated
whether the practitioner or other person has committed a gross and flagrant violation in
one or more instances, or a substantial violation in a substantial number of cases— except
for the QIO Review Manager and QIO Medical Director - should be a member of the QIO
Sanction Panel that attends a requested meeting with the practitioner or other person.
Neither shall any individual who was part of the Sanction Committee nor the peer
reviewer that identifies a potential violation participate in the final recommendation for
the final QIO finding and report to OIG. (See 42 CFR §1004.50.)
The QIO Sanction Committee should complete the following:
1. Receive the case upon initial referral from the peer reviewer;
2. Make its recommendation based on all three Physician Reviewers’ determinations.
In most cases, this means basing a recommendation on the majority of the
determinations; and
3. Complete its review and finding within two (2) business days after the two
additional reviews have been completed.
• If the QIO Sanction Committee does not identify a violation that meets the
reporting threshold, then the original case review process (e.g., beneficiary
complaint review, general quality of care review) proceeds in its normal
course.
If the QIO Sanction Committee identifies a violation that meets the reporting
threshold, then the QIO must notify the CMS Regional Office Contracting
Officer’s Representative (COR) within 1 business day after the sanction
recommendation is made. (See §9025.2.)
History
(Rev. 24, Issued: 02-12-16, Effective: 03-14-16, Implementation: 03-14-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
eb3d4c47b9418a19c36f5750026710dde0735ae1f414588c763f3d16825769e3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.