US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 7, § 7115
Content of Denial Notice
A. Format of Notice
Make your denial notices understandable and write the notices in "plain English." In
addition, make sure that the beneficiary notice:
• Is in letter format;
• Is addressed to the beneficiary or his/her representative, if applicable (Where the
beneficiary is deceased, address the notice to the beneficiary's representative or
estate);
• Has a personalized salutation line (e.g., "Dear Mr. Smith" instead of "Dear
beneficiary" or "Dear representative"); and
• Includes all pertinent information in the body of the notice (i.e., attachments or
enclosures are not acceptable if they are in lieu of required information).
B. Identifying Information
The heading of the notice must include:
• The date of notice;
• The beneficiary's name;
• The beneficiary's Medicare Health Insurance Claim (HIC) Number;
• The beneficiary's address, his/her representative's address, or address of the
person handling the beneficiary's estate if beneficiary is deceased;
• The provider's name;
• The provider's Medicare number (not necessary if you transfer notices to the A/B
MAC (A) electronically);
• The medical record number (if known);
• The admission date (for denials related to "deemed" admission date cases, use the
actual admission date); and
• The attending physician's name (for the services in question).
C. Specificity of Notice
The body of the notice must include:
• Identification of QIO -- Include a brief statement concerning your duties and
functions under the Act.
• Reason for Admission -- Specify the reason for the admission. For partial denials
(i.e., part of the stay is covered), include a statement specifying that the admission
was medically necessary and appropriate (Do not include this statement in
"deemed" admission date denial notices).
• Opportunity for Discussion -- Reference your discussions with the attending
physician and provider. This requirement is met if your notice states that the
involved physician and hospital were provided with an opportunity to discuss the
case.
This applies to initial denial determinations and DRG assignment changes. When the
DRG assignment is changed (either higher or lower), provide the hospital and physician
an opportunity to discuss the DRG change.
• Solicitation of Views -- Reference your solicitation of the beneficiary's or his/her
representative's views. Include the date of your discussion (This provision applies
only when your review is based on a beneficiary's, his/her representative's, or
provider's request for review of a continued-stay HINN).
• Reason for Denial -- Include the relevant facts explaining the reason(s) for the
denial determination. The discussion in the beneficiary notice should be in
layman's terms, and include all the information necessary to support the denial
determination. The discussion must be specific to the individual case (i.e., it is
unacceptable to state only that the services were medically unnecessary,
inappropriate, or constituted custodial care).
o For procedure denials, specify either that the patient requires the
procedure but the services could be performed on an outpatient basis or
that the patient did not require the surgery and, therefore, the procedure
was not medically necessary (See Exhibit 7-28).
o For deemed admission denials, continued-stay denials, day outlier denials,
and partial admission denials (for non-PPS providers), specify the
date(s)/period(s) for the stay or services that are not approved as being
medically necessary or appropriate (A partial denial includes
services/items that Medicare determined to be covered). In addition, for
day outlier and partial admission denials (non-PPS providers), specify the
total number of denied days (See Exhibits 7-26, 7-27, and 7-29).
o For continued-stay denials (related to HINNs) involving "deemed"
admission situations, modify the notice to include the applicable language
(e.g., reason for denial, periods approved and denied, liability
determination) (See Exhibits 7-26 and 7-27).
o For cost outlier denials, specify the dates, charges, and specific
services/items that will not be approved as being medically necessary or
appropriate (See Exhibit 7-30).
o For day outlier denials, distinguish between those days that were not
medically necessary and those where the beneficiary could have safely and
effectively received the services on an outpatient basis.
o For changes to DRG coding information that affect the DRG assignment
(either higher or lower), include a listing of the diagnosis and procedure
codes and a narrative description as submitted by the provider and as
changed by you along with the reason for the changes. Be as specific as
possible in explaining the reason(s) for the changes (See Exhibit 7-31).
Do not notify the hospital of changes to DRG coding information when
the changes do not revise the DRG assignment.
o For billing errors, explain that the error precludes you from completing
review of the case. Instruct the provider to submit an adjusted claim to the
A/B MAC (A) (in accordance with your agreements with the A/B MAC (A)
and provider) (See Exhibit 7-24).
o For circumvention of PPS denials, specify that you are denying the second
admission. Explain whether the denial is based on services that should
have been furnished during the first admission, on an inappropriate
transfer from a PPS unit to a PPS-excluded unit, or on an inappropriate
transfer from a PPS-excluded unit to a PPS unit. Cite the provision of the
law that authorizes QIOs to deny payment for circumvention of PPS (See
Exhibit 7-34).
• Liability Determination for the Beneficiary and Provider -- Include a statement of
the beneficiary's or his/her representative's and the provider's liability
determinations (under §1879 of the Act), including a detailed rationale for the
decision (This applies only to initial medical necessity/custodial care denial
determinations) (See Exhibit 7-20).
o For denials based on circumvention of PPS, explain that the limitation on
liability provisions under §1879 do not apply, that the hospital is liable for
the denied charges, and that the beneficiary or his/her representative is
only responsible for payment of any applicable amounts for deductible,
coinsurance, and convenience services and items normally not covered by
Medicare (See Exhibit 7-34).
o If the beneficiary or his/her representative is found liable, specify the date
of the prior notice. Include a copy of the notice. Do not include a copy of
the beneficiary's prior notice with the provider/physician notice unless the
notice was issued by that provider.
o If the provider is found liable, specify the dates of liability (if applicable)
and the source: brochures, prior notices (including dates), manual
references, criteria, etc. Reference must be specific to individual case.
Give the provider a copy of the source material referenced by you (See
Exhibit 7-20, Conditions II, III, V, IX and X).
o For denials based on a beneficiary's or his/her representative's request for
review of a continued-stay HINN or a provider's request for review of a
proposed continued-stay HINN, include the date of your phone
notification to the beneficiary or his/her representative (See Exhibit 7-20,
Conditions VI and VII).
o For denials involving review of a HINN, do not approve payment for
additional days under §1879 of the Act for purposes of post-discharge
planning (i.e., grace days). A provider who issued a HINN has
demonstrated knowledge that Medicare will not cover the services and,
therefore, §1154(a)(2)(b) is not applicable (See Exhibit 7-20, Conditions
VI and VII).
o For denials based on concurrent review not involving a HINN, you may
approve payment for up to two additional days under §1879 of the Act for
purposes of post-discharge planning (i.e., grace days) (See Exhibit 7-20,
Condition VIII).
NOTE: When you deny a case that involves non-covered services such as routine foot or
dental care, do not apply the provisions of §1879.
• Liability Determination for the Physician -- Include a statement of the payment
liability determination related to denied physician services (Under §§1842(l) and
1879 of the Act). Include a detailed rationale for the decision (Applies to hospital
inpatient and ambulatory/outpatient surgical procedures/services and cost
outlier(s) with physician component denials that are determined to be medically
unnecessary).
o For denials involving claims for services billed on an assigned basis
(whether furnished by Medicare participating or nonparticipating
physicians), make your liability determination in accordance with the
provisions of §1879 of the Act.
o For denials involving services billed on an unassigned basis (by
nonparticipating physicians), make your liability determination in
accordance with the provisions of §1842(l) of the Act.
NOTE: The determination as to whether the physician is protected from payment
liability (when the physician accepts assignment) under §1879 of the Act or from making
a refund to the beneficiary or his/her representative (when the physician does not accept
assignment) under §1842(l) of the Act is made when the initial denial decision is
furnished. In both situations make a determination of the physician's and the
beneficiary's knowledge of the non-covered services. Unless there is evidence to the
contrary (e.g., the physician annotated in the medical record that he/she has given the
beneficiary a written advance notice), presume that the beneficiary or his/her
representative had no knowledge that Medicare would not pay for the denied items or
services furnished by the physician. On a case-by-case basis, the physician may
challenge this presumption when you offer the physician an opportunity to discuss the
case. At the same time, ask the physician if he/she accepted assignment (if you were
unable to determine this information from your review of the documents in the medical
record). The physician should be able to provide you with the information you need as
well as a copy of the written advance notice that he/she gave the beneficiary or his/her
representative.
• Beneficiary Indemnification for Provider Services -- Include a statement related to
the indemnification of the beneficiary or his/her representative when the provider
has been found liable for the denied services.
Include the name, address, and telephone number of the A/B MAC (A, B, or HHH)
where the beneficiary or his/her representative can file a request for
indemnification.
Inform the beneficiary that the following documents must be provided to the A/B
MAC (A, B, or HHH):
o A copy of the denial notice;
o A copy of the bill for the services; and
o A copy of the payment receipt from the provider or any other evidence
showing that the beneficiary paid the provider.
Instruct the beneficiary that the request must be filed within 6 months of the date
of your denial notice (See 42 CFR 411.402(a)(4)).
Specify that if the beneficiary or his/her representative and the provider are not
held liable §§1879(a)(1) and (2) conditions are met, he/she is responsible only for
payment of any deductible, coinsurance, and convenience services and items
normally not covered by Medicare that are furnished during the admission (See
Exhibit 7-20, Condition I).
In addition, specify that if the beneficiary or his/her representative is not held
liable but the provider is held liable, he/she is responsible only for payment of any
convenience services and items normally not covered by Medicare for the denied
period. In this situation, the beneficiary or his/her representative is not
responsible for the denied services including any applicable deductible and
coinsurance (See Exhibit 7-20, Condition II).
• Beneficiary Indemnification for Physician Services -- Include a statement related
to the indemnification of the beneficiary or his/her representative for denied
physician's services (e.g., inpatient procedure, cost outlier with a physician
component, and ambulatory/outpatient surgical denials).
Include the name, address, and telephone number of the A/B MAC (B) where the
beneficiary or his/her representative can file a request for indemnification.
Inform the beneficiary that the following documents must be provided to the A/B
MAC (B):
o A copy of the denial notice;
o A copy of the bill for the services; and
o A copy of the payment receipt from the physician or any other evidence
showing the beneficiary paid the physician.
Instruct the beneficiary that the request must be filed within 6 months of the date
of your denial notice (See 42 CFR 411.402(a)(4)).
For denials involving services billed on an assigned basis by a Medicare
participating or nonparticipating physician, specify that the beneficiary or his/her
representative should contact the A/B MAC (B) for any refund (See Exhibit 7-20,
Conditions III, XI, and XII).
For denials involving services billed on an unassigned basis by a nonparticipating
physician, specify that the beneficiary or his/her representative should contact the
physician for any refund (See Exhibit 7-20, Condition IIIA).
• Beneficiary's Future Payment Liability -- Include a statement related to the
liability for payment of denied services occurring in the future that involve the
same, or reasonably comparable, conditions.
This applies only to initial medical necessity/custodial (level of) care denial
determinations.
Do not include such a statement if the denial is for a procedure that cannot be
repeated (e.g., total removal of an organ).
• Reconsideration Rights -- Include a statement of the reconsideration rights
(including expedited reconsideration, if applicable) of the beneficiary or his/her
representative, provider, and attending physician (See Exhibit 7-21). This applies
only to initial denial determinations.
The statement must specify:
o The places that the beneficiary or his/her representative may file a
reconsideration (i.e., Social Security Administration (SSA) Office,
Railroad Retirement Office, if applicable, or at your office);
o The time requirements to file a request; and
o The possible outcomes of your review as a result of a request for
reconsideration.
• Beneficiary Right To Legal Representation -- Include a statement informing the
beneficiary or his/her representative of the options for obtaining attorney
representation at any step of the appeal process, of the availability of free legal
services organizations, and to contact the local social security office for additional
information, if needed (See §206(c) of the Act). This requirement is applicable to
QIOs involved in the Medicare program by 42 USC 1395(ii). This applies only to
initial medical necessity/custodial (level of) care denial determinations.
Insert the following statement, which shall not be altered, after the reconsideration
rights paragraph in all initial denials where the beneficiary or his/her
representative receives your notification:
o "If you want help with your appeal of this denial determination, you can
have a friend, lawyer, or someone else help you. Some lawyers do not
charge unless you win your appeal. There are groups, such as lawyer
referral services, that can help you find a lawyer. There are also groups,
such as legal aid services, who will give you free legal services if you
qualify."
• Beneficiary Right to Review the Medical Record -- Include a statement informing
the beneficiary or his/her representative of the right to examine his/her complete
medical record and to receive a copy of that record. This applies only to initial
medical necessity/custodial (level of) care denial determinations.
Insert the following statement, which cannot be altered, after the beneficiary right
to legal representation paragraph in all initial denials where the beneficiary or
his/her representative receives your notification:
o "You have the right to examine the complete medical record (and other
pertinent information) that we relied upon in making this denial
determination. Although the hospital is the official repository of the
medical records relevant to stays in the facility, should you wish to
examine the records and other pertinent information for this particular
stay, contact us at the address or telephone number listed above. There is
no charge to examine the material at our office. You may also request a
copy of the medical record and other pertinent information. We will,
however, charge you a reasonable fee for photocopying and mailing this
information."
If the beneficiary or his/her representative requests the record, redact any QIO
deliberations and the names of any QIO review coordinators, physician advisors,
or consultants from the material before its release. All practitioner-specific
information must be released. Disclose the names of all practitioners who were
involved in the patient's treatment and whose names appear in the medical record
or other pertinent information.
NOTE: Do not make notations on pages of the medical record in order to minimize the
amount of redacting required.
Provide the record at a reasonable cost. The cost is limited to the cost of copying,
redacting, and mailing the information.
• Re-review Rights Related to DRG Assignment Changes -- Include a statement of
the re-review or reopening rights of the provider and physician. Re-review or
reopening rights do not apply when the DRG assignment does not change.
Specify the place to file a review (i.e., QIO).
Specify the time requirements for filing such a request.
NOTE: The re-review or reopening rights do not apply to coding changes that do not
affect DRG assignment.
• Signature -- For denial notices include the signature, including title, of the QIO
Medical Director or the signature of the QIO physician to whom the Medical
Director has delegated this authority. If you delegate this authority to your
physician reviewers, do so in accordance with the confidentiality regulations,
which specify that the identity of the reviewer cannot be disclosed unless the
individual gives his/her consent (See 42 CFR 476.101(b) and 133(a)(2)(iii)). The
Billing Error Denial Notice (Exhibit 7-24) may also be signed by the QIO Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) or appropriate designee. DRG assignment changes that
do not involve medical judgment may also be signed by the Accredited Record
Technician or Registered Record Administrator.
7200 - Introduction - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Under your contract with CMS, you are required to conduct medical case review to
determine whether the quality of the services provided meets professionally recognized
standards of care (See 42 CFR 476.71(a)(2)).
7210 - Notification Requirements - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
When you identify a potential quality concern, issue a written notice to the provider and
to any physicians apparently involved in the concern. Advise them of your concern, and
offer them an opportunity to discuss the potential concern.
Send notices only to the physicians involved in a concern who can provide you with
information necessary for you to make a quality determination (See Exhibit 7-74). Much
of the information in notices sent to the involved physicians may be identical. However,
preserve the confidential nature of the communication to each physician. Tailor each
notice to elicit each physician's unique perspective on the concern in question. Inform
each physician only of his/her involvement in the potential concern. Do not advise a
physician of another physician's involvement.
Do not needlessly proliferate notices to physicians. Send only those notices necessary for
resolution of the potential concern. If, after the opportunity to discuss, you believe that
an additional physician(s) should be contacted, issue an additional preliminary notice(s),
as appropriate.
Once you have completed your review of the potential quality concern (after the
opportunity to discuss has been offered), issue a written final notice to each party to
whom you sent an initial notice, advising them of your favorable or unfavorable quality
determination. If you conduct a re-review of a confirmed quality concern, issue a written
notice to the provider and any physicians affected by your re-review determination,
advising them of your favorable or unfavorable quality determination.
Issue separate, original notices in all cases. Issuing copies to the provider or physician is
not acceptable.
NOTE: Your agreement with the provider may specify where to send your provider
notices. It is expected that the designated contact(s) would represent both the
administrative and medical staffs (e.g., Chair of the Quality Assurance Committee).
7220 - Basic Elements for Quality Concern Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Your quality concern notices must be clear, informative, and non-threatening (e.g., do not
quote at length from QIO regulations). In addition, all notices must contain the following
basic elements:
A. Heading
The heading of the notice must include:
Your letterhead;
The date of the notice;
The name and address of the addressee; and
Case-identifying information. Specify the patient's name, patient's health
insurance claim number, provider name, provider number, date of
admission/service, and medical record number (if known).
B. Body
The body of the notice must contain:
A salutation;
A brief statement concerning your duties and functions under the Act;
A brief statement explaining the purpose of your quality review activities and
acknowledging the importance of the provider's/physician's cooperation;
A brief summary of the background of the case. Specify the name of the patient,
the name of the provider, the procedure, treatment, condition, and/or services
involved, as appropriate; and
A confidentiality and re-disclosure statement.
C. Signature
The notice must be signed by the medical director or the QIO physician to whom the
medical director has delegated this authority. Include a title with the signature.
7230 - Potential Quality Concern Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of all potential quality concern
notices must contain the following elements:
A statement that a QIO physician reviewer has reviewed the medical record;
A summary of the case findings and concerns from the Preliminary Decision
portion of the Physician Reviewer Assessment Format (PRAF) (Attaching a copy
of the PRAF and referring to the attachment is not acceptable). Although you
may reference the PRAF categories for classifying your concerns, do not use the
PRAF numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40, D.99) in your notice. Include
sufficient detail so that the parties addressed will clearly understand the identified
potential concern;
A statement that the identified concern is a potential concern;
A statement offering an opportunity to discuss the case. Specify the method
(either by telephone or in writing is acceptable), the timeframe (20 calendar days),
and that your determination will be made on the basis of the medical record alone
if no response is received within the stated timeframe. Include the name of a QIO
contact person, your address, and telephone number;
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of the
potential quality concern and given an opportunity to discuss the case. Specify
the name of the provider. Do not specify the name of any other physician(s) you
may be notifying;
For provider notices, a statement that the involved physician(s) is also being
notified of the potential quality concern and given an opportunity to discuss the
case. Specify the name of the physician(s); and
A statement encouraging the provider and physician to coordinate their responses
to you.
7240 - Final Quality Concern Determination Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
A. Confirmed Quality Concern Determination
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
A statement that a QIO physician reviewer has reviewed the medical record and
any additional information provided during the opportunity for discussion;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including a preferred course of
action which would have improved care, from the Initial/Final Decision portion of
the PRAF (Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the attachment is not
acceptable). Although you may reference the categories for classifying your
concerns, do not use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40, D.99) in your
notice;
A brief statement of your action to be taken. Explain that the results of your
review will be entered into your database for pattern analysis and used for related
analysis activities. Explain that the physician and provider will have ample
opportunity to discuss any patterns involving confirmed quality concerns;
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of the
confirmed quality concern. Specify the name of the provider. Do not specify the
name of any other physician(s) you may be notifying;
For provider notices, a statement that the involved physician(s) is also being
notified of the confirmed quality concern. Specify the name of the physician(s);
and
A statement of re-review rights. Specify the method of request (in writing), the
timeframe for the request (30 calendar days), and that the request should include
the reason for disagreement with the determination and any additional information
to be considered in making a re-review determination. Include the name of a QIO
contact person, your address, and telephone number.
B. Favorable Quality Review Determination
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
A statement that a QIO physician reviewer has reviewed the medical record and
any additional information provided during the opportunity for discussion;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including the basis for your
favorable determination, from the Initial/Final Decision portion of the PRAF
(Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the attachment is not acceptable).
Although you may reference the categories for classifying your concerns, do not
use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40, D.99) in your notice;
A brief statement of your action to be taken. Explain that the results of your
review will be entered into your database for pattern analysis and used for related
analysis activities;
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of your
final determination. Do not specify the name of any other physician(s) you may
be notifying; and
For provider notices, a statement that the involved physician(s) is also being
notified of your final determination. Specify the name of the physician(s).
7250 - Re-review Quality Concern Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
A. Confirmed Quality Concern Upheld
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
The date of the re-review request;
An explanation that the physician reviewer who conducted the re-review was not
involved in the original quality concern determination;
A statement that the QIO physician reviewer has re-examined the medical record
and any additional information provided by the provider and/or physician;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including a preferred course of
action which would have improved care, from the Reconsideration/Re-review
Decision portion of the PRAF (Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the
attachment is not acceptable). Although you may reference the categories for
classifying your concerns, do not use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40,
D.99) in your notice;
A brief statement of the action to be taken. Explain that the results of your review
will be entered into your database for pattern analysis, used for your related
pattern analysis activities, and that the physician and provider will have ample
opportunity to discuss any patterns involving quality concerns;
A statement that the re-review determination is final (i.e., no further appeals
apply);
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of your
re-review determination. Specify the name of the provider. Do not specify the
name of any other physician(s) you may be notifying; and
For provider notices, a statement that the affected physician(s) is also being
notified of your re-review determination. Specify the name of the physician(s).
B. Confirmed Quality Concern Reversed
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
The date of the re-review request;
An explanation that the physician reviewer who conducted the re-review was not
involved in the original quality concern determination;
A statement that the QIO physician reviewer has re-examined the medical record
and any additional information provided by the provider and/or physician;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including the basis for your
favorable determination, from the Reconsideration/Re-review Decision portion of
the PRAF (Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the attachment is not
acceptable). Although you may reference the categories for classifying your
concerns, do not use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40, D.99) in your
notice;
A brief statement of the action to be taken. Explain that the results of your review
will be entered into your database for pattern analysis and your pattern analysis
activities;
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of your
re-review determination. Specify the name of the provider. Do not specify the
name of any other physician(s) you may be notifying; and
For provider notices, a statement that the affected physician(s) is also being
notified of your re-review determination. Specify the name of the physician(s).
History
(Rev. 18, Issued: 10-10-14, Effective: Upon Implementation of ICD-10, Implementation: Upon Implementation of ICD-10)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7e3bcf6b5a511b016ad3a72da23ea44aa25264e1b2620176b3c171c2b2589bb2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.