US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-10, ch. 7, § 7050
Notice of Discharge and Medicare Appeal Rights –
The Medicare+Choice Organization (M+CO) or the hospital (as delegated) issues the
NODMAR with the physician's concurrence to the M+C enrollee. The physician's
concurrence acknowledges agreement that inpatient hospital care is no longer necessary.
A. When the M+CO Issues the NODMAR
The M+CO issues the NODMAR to the M+C enrollee once the required concurrence of
the physician who is responsible for the enrollee's hospital care has been obtained (See 42
CFR 422.620(b)).
B. When Hospital Accepts Delegation
If the M+CO allows the hospital to make the non-coverage/discharge determination
(delegation), the hospital must obtain concurrence from the contracting physician
responsible for the enrollee's hospital care or of another physician as authorized by the
M+CO (see 42 CFR 422.620(d)).
C. Content of NODMAR
The NODMAR must include the following information:
The reason why inpatient hospital care is no longer needed;
The effective date of the enrollee's liability for continued inpatient care; and
The enrollee's appeal rights.
D. QIO Responsibility -- You are not required to review or educate the plans regarding
the content of the NODMAR. However, if you find an inappropriate NODMAR (e.g.,
the liability date is missing) during the course of your review, you are expected to report
such findings to the CMS RO plan manager through your Project Officer.
7055 - Medicare Enrollee Request for Quality Improvement
Organization (QIO) Immediate Review - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
A. Enrollee Request
If the Medicare enrollee or his/her representative disagree with the NODMAR and the
Medicare enrollee remains in the hospital, he/she may request (no later than noon of the
first working day after the day the notice was received) an immediate review by you.
This request for review may be made by telephone or in writing (See 42 CFR 422.622).
NOTE: In cases involving a M+CO located outside the QIO review area, the request for
immediate QIO review must be made to and reviewed by the QIO that has the agreement
(under 42 CFR 476.78) with the hospital treating the enrollee, not the QIO with the
agreement with the M+CO. This means regardless of whether the determination was
made by a M+CO or a hospital, the QIO that has the agreement with the M+CO is not
involved (see chapter 3, for the Memorandum of Agreement requirement related to
NODMAR).
B. M+C Notification
On the day that you receive the enrollee's request for an immediate review, you must
notify the M+CO.
C. QIO Request for Medical Information
The M+CO must take the following actions once an enrollee's request for an immediate
review is confirmed:
The M+CO must supply any information that you require to conduct your review.
This information must be made available to you, by telephone or in writing, by
close of business of the first full working day immediately following the day the
enrollee submits the request for review.
The M+CO must contact the hospital and request that the enrollee's medical
records and other pertinent information be sent to you by close of business of the
first full working day immediately following the organization's request.
D. QIO Immediate Review
Solicitation of Views -- You must solicit the view of the enrollee or his/her
representative that requested the immediate review (See §7020).
QIO Review Determination -- Once you have received all the necessary
information from the hospital or the organization or both (e.g., medical records),
review the case and notify the enrollee, the hospital, and the M+CO of your
determination by close of business of the first working day following receipt of all
pertinent information. Make your notification initially by telephone and follow
up with a written notification (See §7015.B.1).
E. Enrollee Liability Protection
If the M+CO authorized coverage of the inpatient admission directly or by delegation (or
the admission constitutes emergency or urgently needed services as described in 42 CFR
422.2 and 422.112(c)), the organization continues to be financially responsible for the
costs of the hospital stay when a timely appeal is filed until noon of the calendar day
following the day you notify the enrollee of your decision.
NOTE: The hospital may not charge the M+CO (or the enrollee) if it was the hospital
(acting on behalf of the enrollee) that filed the request for immediate QIO review and the
QIO upholds the non-coverage determination made by the M+CO.
F. Untimely Request for QIO Immediate Review
If the request for an immediate review is not filed timely by the Medicare enrollee or
his/her representative, do not review the case.
Instructions found at 42 CFR 422.622(a)(2) provide an enrollee who fails to make a
timely request for QIO review the fall-back option of requesting an expedited
reconsideration from the M+CO. You must notify the beneficiary that his/her case is
being referred to the M+CO for an expedited reconsideration (72 hour fast review).
NOTE: The beneficiary is not entitled to subsequent review by the M+CO under the
regulations at 42 CFR 422.582 and 42 CFR 422.584 once a QIO review is requested.
Instead, the beneficiary has further appeal rights under 42 CFR 478.
G. NODMAR Rescinded
If the M+CO notifies you that the NODMAR has been rescinded after requesting the
medical records, you should:
Instruct the hospital to submit the medical records (including a copy of the notice
rescinding the NODMAR);
Review the medical record and determine whether or not the hospital acted
appropriately in rescinding the notice;
Notify the beneficiary that the NODMAR was rescinded if you agree with the
hospital’s action and that he/she should have received a written notification from
the hospital; and
Issue your written initial determination (including a determination of the
beneficiary’s liability for payment under §1869 of the Act) if you disagree with
the hospital’s rescinded NODMAR.
Because you do not monitor the issuance of the NODMAR, you are to refer to the Project
Officer any single case where a NODMAR has been rescinded.
7100 - Authority - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Deny claims in accordance with 42 CFR 476.83 when you determine that health care
services furnished or proposed to be furnished to a beneficiary are non-covered because
they are not medically necessary and reasonable (§1862(a)(1) of the Act) or constitute
custodial care (§1862(a)(9) of the Act). In addition, QIOs may deny Part A claims when
a hospital circumvents the Prospective Payment System (PPS) through unnecessary
admissions or readmissions in accordance with §1886(f)(2) of the Act (Deny claims only
as specified in §4255). If, as a result of DRG validation, you determine that the diagnosis
and/or procedures billed by the hospital should be changed and the DRG is affected,
change the DRG assignment in accordance with 42 CFR Part 476. Provide written
notification of initial denial determinations and DRG assignment changes to all affected
parties as specified in 42 CFR 476.94.
7101 - Types of Denial Determinations - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Initial and technical denials apply to services/items furnished in acute/specialty hospitals
(including swing beds) and hospital outpatient/ambulatory surgical centers, hereafter
referred to as providers.
A. Initial Denials
Initial denial determinations are subject to reconsideration and further appeals. These
types of denials include:
Preadmissions;
Admission;
Continued-stay;
Circumvention of PPS;
Services/procedures; and
Cost outliers (and day outliers, if applicable).
NOTE: Render an initial denial determination only after you have afforded the
provider/practitioner an opportunity for discussion.
B. Technical Denials
Technical denial determinations are not subject to reconsideration and further appeals,
but may be subject to re-review/reopening (See §7102.B). These types of denials
include:
Medical record not submitted timely (42 CFR 476.90(b)); and
Billing errors (including cost outlier denials due to duplicative billing for services
or for services not actually furnished or not ordered by the physician).
NOTE: Opportunity for discussion does not apply to technical denials.
C. DRG Assignment Changes
The DRG assignment changes may result from your correction of technical coding errors
or your correction of diagnostic, procedure, or discharge status information and the
related codes. Changes to the DRG coding information are not subject to reconsideration
and further appeals. These changes are, however, subject to re-review/reopening when
they result in a revised DRG assignment and lower payment (See 42 CFR 478.15 and
478.48).
NOTE: Render DRG assignment changes only after you have afforded the
provider/practitioner an opportunity for discussion.
7102 - Denial and Reopening Timeframes - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
A. Initial Denial Determinations and DRG Assignment Changes
Render an initial denial determination or DRG assignment change within one year of the
payment date of the claim containing the service(s) in question (see 42 CFR
476.96(a)(1)).
If the RO approves the action in writing, you may render an initial denial determination
or DRG assignment change after one year but within four years of the payment date of
the claim containing the service(s) in question (See 42 CFR 476.96(b)(1)).
NOTE: These timeframes also apply to technical denial determinations.
Issue notices to all appropriate parties as specified in §§7105-7115. Process
reconsideration requests as specified in §§7400-7440.
B. Reopening of Initial Denial Determinations and DRG Assignment Changes
Conduct reopening as specified below. Issue notices to all appropriate parties if the
reopening results in a change in your initial denial determination or a change in DRG
assignment (See §§7105-7115).
Reopening Within One Year -- You may reopen an initial denial determination or
DRG assignment change within one year of the date of your decision (See 42
CFR 476.96(a)(2)).
NOTE: You may reopen a technical denial determination within one year of the date of
your decision when you deny the claim for lack of medical record information and the
information is subsequently provided (Do not reopen any other types of technical denial
determinations).
Reopening After One Year But Within Four Years -- You may reopen an initial
denial determination or DRG assignment change after one year but within 4 years
of the date of your decision if (See 42 CFR 476.96(b)(2)):
• You receive additional information on the patient's condition that affects
the basis of the prior decision;
NOTE: The additional information is generally part of the medical record for the stay in
question. There may be exceptions such as additional information related to other
hospital stays, physician notes, etc. Addendum orders (i.e., where the physician did not
order a service/procedure and retroactively writes such an order) are not considered
"additional information."
• Reviewer error occurred in interpretation or application of Medicare
coverage policy or review guidelines;
• There is an error apparent on the face of the evidence upon which the
initial denial or DRG assignment change was based; or
• There is a clerical error in the statement of the initial denial determination
or DRG assignment change.
NOTE: You may reopen a technical denial determination after one year but within four
years of the date of your decision when you deny the claim for lack of medical record
information and the information is subsequently provided (Do not reopen any other types
of technical denial determinations).
7105 - Notification of Denial - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Provide written notification of initial denials, technical denials, and DRG assignment
changes to all affected parties, as appropriate (See Exhibits 7-22 through 7-34).
A. Parties to be Notified - Provide Written Notice to:
The beneficiary or his/her representative. Do not notify the beneficiary or his/her
representative of DRG assignment changes or denials based on circumvention of
PPS or billing errors;
The attending physician or other attending health care practitioner. Do not notify
the individual of circumvention of PPS denials. You are only required to notify
the individual of changes to DRG coding information when the changes revise the
DRG assignment;
The provider (if known, include in preadmission/pre-procedure cases). You and
the provider are to specify in your memorandum of agreement who will receive
your notices for the provider. You are only required to notify the provider of
changes to DRG coding information when the changes revise the DRG
assignment; and
The intermediary/carrier. If you notify the intermediary/carrier electronically of
the denial determination (including limitation of liability determinations, if
applicable), you need not provide a hardcopy of the notice. Notify the
intermediary of DRG assignment changes. Do not notify the intermediary of
coding changes that do not affect the DRG assignment.
B. Issuance of Notice
Issue notices on a case-by-case basis as follows:
One notice addressed to the beneficiary or his/her representative with copies to
the provider, attending physician, and intermediary/carrier; or
One notice addressed to the provider (when the beneficiary or his/her
representative is not notified) with copies to the attending physician and
intermediary/carrier (Do not send a copy to the attending physician for
circumvention of PPS denials).
If a case is selected for retrospective review and you find that a HINN was issued, do not
issue a denial notice if you agree with the provider's decision and the beneficiary was not
liable for charges (Issue a notice for all HINN cases reviewed at the beneficiary's or
provider's request).
C. Determination of Beneficiary Address
Ensure that denial notices mailed to beneficiaries who are no longer in the facility are
sent to the correct address. To assist you in determining the beneficiary's correct address,
CMS can provide you with copies of the Carrier Alphabetic State File (CASF) on
microfilm or the Beneficiary Eligibility Status Tapes (BEST) on magnetic tape. Use of
these files is optional. To obtain copies on an ongoing basis, send a written request to
your RO project officer. There is no charge to you for these files.
History
(Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
d1f3829aae11f473d36370f51281a1d8e147516c165a2a42f0aa1229f0bc0149
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.