US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 10, § 10.6.21
Miscellaneous Enrollment Topics
This section 10.6.21 addresses additional provider enrollment policies. Except as otherwise
stated, the instructions in this section supersede any other instructions to the contrary in this
chapter. It is anticipated that the provisions in this section 10.6.21 will eventually be moved to
those sections of this chapter most applicable to their respective subject matter. For
organizational reasons, section 10.6.21 is merely a placeholder section of chapter 10.
A. Special Form CMS-855S Instructions
1. Addresses
If an address (e.g., correspondence address, practice location) on the Form CMS-855S lacks a
city, state, or zip + four, the contractor can verify the missing data in any manner it chooses. In
addition, the contractor can obtain the zip + four from either the U.S. Postal Service or the
Delivery Point Validation in PECOS.
2. Insurance
With respect to the comprehensive liability insurance supplier standard in 42 CFR §
424.57(a)(10), the contractor shall: (1) verify with the insurance agent that the insurance policy is
active and current; and (2) ensure that the contractor (i.e., the NPE contractor) is listed as the
policy holder on the certificate. The contractor may contact the insurance agent via any manner
it chooses; however, verification shall be documented consistent with section 10.6.19 of this
chapter (e.g., documenting telephonic communications).
B. Transitioned Certified Providers and Suppliers – E-Mails to PEOG for Final
Application Review and/or Approval
As described in this chapter, the contractor must refer various matters involving transitioned
certified provider/supplier enrollment applications to PEOG for final application review and
approval (e.g., system updates, assignment of CCN, etc.) When making such referrals---and
notwithstanding any other instruction to the contrary in this chapter---the e-mail subject line shall
include the following: SUBJECT LINE: S&C: Facility Type; Application Type; Facility Name;
National Provider Identifier; CCN; Application Receipt Date (MMDDYY*) (*Date the
Contractor Received the Application from the Provider/Supplier). (Note, however, that this data
need not be duplicated in the e-mail’s body.) This instruction, to reiterate, only applies to e-mails to PEOG involving: (1) transitioned certified providers/suppliers; and (2) instances where
the contractor is explicitly required per this chapter to send the matter PEOG for final review,
approval, and/or denial of an application (e.g., initial application, CHOW, certain COIs) and to
wait for PEOG’s determination. (See, for example, section 10.6.1.2(A)(3)(a) of this chapter.)
C. Contacting State or SOG Location for Updates
1. “Transitioned” Certified Providers/Suppliers - In situations where the contractor recommends
approval to the state (initial applications, CHOWs, certain changes of information, etc.), the
contractor---if it has not received the state’s recommendation within 120 days after the contractor
sent its recommendation---may contact the state to ascertain whether said recommendation is
forthcoming. The contractor may contact the state every 30 days thereafter to determine the
recommendation’s status.
2. “Non-Transitioned” Certified Providers/Suppliers – If, as described in subsection (H)(1)
above, the contractor recommends approval to the state, the contractor may contact the state for
an update on the recommendation’s status beginning 120 days after the recommendation was
sent and every 30 days thereafter. If the state informs the contractor (via any means) that the
application has been forwarded to the SOG Location, the contractor may contact the SOG
Location for a status update every 30 days beginning on the date the contractor received this
notice from the state.
D. Survey and Certification Documents – All Certified Providers and Certified Suppliers
1. Documents from the State/AO
As applicable to the provider/supplier type in question, the state or accrediting organization (AO)
must provide the signed CMS-1561 (or other/similar contract) and copy of the HHS-690 to the
contractor with its approval recommendation. (Note that the contractor can accept a CMS-1561
or HHS-690 from either the state or AO.)
If the state/AO neither furnished said documents nor otherwise indicated that they were
uploaded into the Automated Survey Process Environment (ASPEN)/Internet Quality
Improvement and Evaluation System (IQIES), the contractor shall contact the state/AO via any
means for the applicable document(s). If the state/AO responds within 10 days of the
contractor’s request by either (a) sending the document(s) to the contractor or (b) stating that it
has uploaded the document(s) into ASPEN/IQIES, the contractor can continue processing the
application consistent with applicable instructions. (If the state/AO indicated (b) above, the
contractor shall note this in its referral to PEOG.) If the state/AO does neither (a) nor (b) within
this 10-day period, the contractor shall: (1) proceed with sending the referral to PEOG consistent
with existing instructions; and (2) include evidence of the state/AO’s lack of responsiveness
(e.g., e-mail evidence of the contractor’s request).
2. AO Documents to PEOG
As applicable to the situation and provider/supplier type, the contractor shall include the AO
deeming letter in referrals to PEOG that are required under this chapter (e.g., initial approvals).
History
(Rev. 12639; Issued: 05-16-24; Effective: 06-17-24; Implementation: 06-17-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
159443e131bc74f57fc899f50d334d025fdb14ddefbddc5ff8d58b48778b481a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.