US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 10, § 10.4.2.2
Denial Reasons
A. Denial Reason 1– Not in Compliance with Medicare Requirements (42 CFR
§424.530(a)(1))
“The provider or supplier is determined not to be in compliance with the enrollment
requirements in this Title 42 or on the enrollment application applicable to its provider or
supplier type and has not submitted a plan of corrective action as outlined in 42 CFR part 488.”
Such non-compliance includes, but is not limited to, the following situations:
i. The provider or supplier does not have a physical business address or mobile unit where
services can be rendered.
ii. The provider or supplier does not have a place where patient records are stored to determine
the amounts due such provider or other person.
iii. The provider or supplier is not appropriately licensed.
iv. The provider or supplier is not authorized by the federal/state/local government to perform
the services that it intends to render.
v. The provider or supplier does not meet CMS regulatory requirements for the specialty that it
seeks to enroll as. (See section 10.2.8 of this chapter for examples of suppliers that are not
eligible to participate.)
vi. The provider or supplier does not have a valid social security number (SSN) or employer
identification number (EIN) for itself, an owner, partner, managing organization/employee,
officer, director, medical director, and/or authorized or delegated official.
vii. The applicant does not qualify as a provider of services or a supplier of medical and health
services. (For instance, the applicant is not recognized by any federal statute as a Medicare
provider or supplier (see section 10.2.8 of this chapter.)) An entity seeking Medicare payment
must be able to receive reassigned benefits from physicians in accordance with the Medicare
reassignment provisions in § 1842(b)(6) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(b)).
viii. The provider or supplier does not otherwise meet general enrollment requirements.
(With respect to (v) above – and, as applicable, (iii) and (iv) - the contractor’s denial letter shall
cite the appropriate statutory and/or regulatory citation(s) containing the specific
licensure/certification/authorization requirement(s) for that provider or supplier type. For a
listing of some of these statutes and regulations, refer to section 10.2 et seq. of this chapter.)
NOTE: The contractor must identify in its denial letter the exact provision within said
statute(s)/regulation(s) with which the provider/supplier is non-compliant.
(NOTE: For (a)(1) denials involving an individual practitioner who is not appropriately licensed
due to a disciplinary action, PEOG -- rather than the contractor -- will make all denial
determinations for this noncompliance requirement).
B. Denial Reason 2– Excluded/Debarred from Federal Program (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(2))
(i) “The provider or supplier, or any owner, managing employee, managing organization, officer,
director, authorized or delegated official, medical director, supervising physician, or other health
care or administrative or management services personnel (such as a billing specialist, accountant,
or human resources specialist) furnishing services payable by a federal health care program, of
the provider or supplier is—
(A) Excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or any other federal health care program, as defined in
42 CFR § 1001.2, in accordance with section 1128, 1128A, 1156, 1842, 1862, 1867 or 1892 of
the Social Security Act, or
(B) Debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in any other Federal
procurement or non-procurement program or activity in accordance with section 2455 of the
Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act.”
(ii) The individuals and organizations identified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section include, but
are not limited to, W–2 employees and contracted individuals and organizations of the provider
or supplier.
(Unless stated otherwise in section 10.6.6 of this chapter or in another CMS directive, the
contractor need not review the OIG exclusion list for any “health care or administrative or
management services personnel” who are not otherwise required to be reported on the enrollment
application.)
C. Denial Reason 3 – Felony Conviction (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(3))
“The provider, supplier, or any owner, managing employee, managing organization, officer,
director, of the provider or supplier was, within the preceding 10 years, convicted (as that term is
defined in 42 CFR § 1001.2) of a federal or state felony offense that CMS determines to be
detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.
(i) Offenses include, but are not limited in scope and severity to:
A. Felony crimes against persons, such as murder, rape, assault, and other similar crimes for
which the individual was convicted, including guilty pleas and adjudicated pretrial
diversions.
B. Financial crimes, such as extortion, embezzlement, income tax evasion, insurance fraud and
other similar crimes for which the individual was convicted, including guilty pleas and
adjudicated pretrial diversions.
C. Any felony that placed the Medicare program or its beneficiaries at immediate risk, such as a
malpractice suit resulting in a conviction of criminal neglect or misconduct.
D. Any felonies outlined in section 1128 of the Social Security Act.
(ii) Denials based on felony convictions are for a period to be determined by the Secretary, but
not less than 10 years from the date of conviction if the individual has been convicted on one
previous occasion for one or more offenses.
(iii) The individuals and organizations identified in paragraph (a)(3) of this section include, but
are not limited to, W–2 employees and contracted individuals and organizations of the provider
or supplier.”
While a reenrollment bar is established for revoked providers/suppliers, this does not preclude
the contractor from denying reenrollment to a provider/supplier that was convicted of a felony
within the preceding 10-year period or that otherwise does not meet all of the criteria necessary
to enroll in Medicare.
Note that if an MDPP coach meets the above felony requirements, this would not itself warrant a
denial of the MDPP supplier under § 424.535(a)(3). This is because the coach, not the MDPP
supplier, has the felony conviction. The MDPP supplier could, however, be denied enrollment
under § 424.530(a)(1) (non-compliance with enrollment requirements) for having an ineligible
coach.
As explained in section 10.6.6 of this chapter, the contractor shall submit all felonies found on
Form CMS-855 and CMS-20134 applications to PEOG for review via
ProviderEnrollmentRevocations@cms.hhs.gov. (See section 10.6.6 for more information.)
D. Denial Reason 4– False or Misleading Information on Application (42 CFR §
424.530(a)(4))
“The provider or supplier submitted false or misleading information on the enrollment
application to gain enrollment in the Medicare program.”
E. Denial Reason 5– On-Site Review/Other Reliable Evidence that Requirements Not Met
(42 CFR §424.530(a)(5))
“Upon onsite review or other reliable evidence, CMS determines that the provider or supplier:
(i) Is not operational to furnish Medicarecovered items or services; or
(ii) Otherwise fails to satisfy any Medicare enrollment requirement.”
F. Denial Reason 6– Medicare Debt (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(6))
1. Background
Consistent with 42 CFR § 424.530(a)(6), an enrollment application may be denied if:
(i) The provider, supplier, or owner thereof (as defined in § 424.502) has an existing Medicare
debt:
(ii) The enrolling provider, supplier, or owner (as defined in § 424.502) thereof was previously
the owner of a provider or supplier that had a Medicare debt that existed when the latter's
enrollment was voluntarily terminated, involuntarily terminated, or revoked, and all the
following criteria are met:
(A) The owner left the provider or supplier with the Medicare debt within 1 year before or after
that provider or supplier's voluntary termination, involuntary termination, or revocation.
(B) The Medicare debt has not been fully repaid.
(C) CMS determines that the uncollected debt poses an undue risk of fraud, waste, or abuse. In
making this determination [under § 424.530(a)(6)(ii)], CMS considers the following factors:
(1) The amount of the Medicare debt.
(2) The length and timeframe that the enrolling provider, supplier, or owner thereof was an
owner of the prior entity.
(3) The percentage of the enrolling provider, supplier, or owner's ownership of the prior entity.
(4) Whether the Medicare debt is currently being appealed.
(5) Whether the enrolling provider, supplier, or owner thereof was an owner of the prior entity at
the time the Medicare debt was incurred.”
In addition, a denial of Medicare enrollment under paragraph (a)(6)(ii) can be avoided if the
enrolling provider, supplier, or owner thereof does either of the following: (1) satisfies the
criteria set forth in § 401.607 and agrees to a CMSapproved extended repayment schedule for the
entire outstanding Medicare debt; or (2) repays the debt in full.
2. Contractor’s Determination of Overpayment
When processing a Form CMS-855A, CMS-855B, CMS-855I, CMS-855S, or CMS-20134 initial
or change of ownership application (if applicable), the contractor shall determine – using a
system generated monthly listing – whether the provider, supplier, or any owner listed in Section
5 or 6 of the application has an existing or delinquent Medicare overpayment, as described in
section 10.4.2.2(F)(1) above and § 424.530(a)(6). If such an overpayment exists, the contractor
shall deny the application, using 42 CFR §424.530(a)(6) as the basis. However, prior PEOG
approval is required before proceeding with the denial. The contractor shall under no
circumstances deny an application under § 424.530(a)(6) without receiving PEOG approval to do
so.
3. Examples
Example #1: Dr. X, a sole proprietor, has a $70,000 overpayment. Three months later, Dr. X
joins Group Y and becomes a 50 percent owner thereof. Group Y submits an initial enrollment
application two months thereafter. Group Y’s enrollment could be denied because Dr. X is an
owner.
Example #2: Dr. Smith’s practice (“Smith Medicine”) is set up as a sole proprietorship. Dr.
Smith incurs a $50,000 overpayment. Dr. Smith terminates Medicare enrollment. Six months
later, Dr. Smith tries to enroll as a sole proprietorship; the practice is named “JS Medicine.” A
denial is warranted because § 424.530(a)(6) applies to physicians and the $50,000 overpayment
was attached to Dr. Smith as the sole proprietor.
Example #3 - Same scenario as example #2 but assume that Dr. Smith’s new practice is an LLC
of which Dr. Smith is only a 30 percent owner. A denial is still warranted because Dr. Smith is
an owner of the enrolling supplier and the $50,000 overpayment was attached to Dr. Smith.
Example #4 - Smith is a nurse practitioner in a solo practice. The practice (“Smith Medicine”) is
set up as a closely held corporation, of which Smith is the 100 percent owner. Smith Medicine is
assessed a $20,000 overpayment. Smith terminates the Medicare enrollment. Nine months later,
Smith submits a Form CMS-855I application to enroll Smith as a new individual supplier. The
business will be established as a sole proprietorship. A denial is not warranted because the
$20,000 overpayment was attached to Smith Medicine, not to Smith.
In each of these examples, however, denial could be avoided if (1) the party with the
overpayment is on a Medicare-approved plan of repayment or (2) the overpayments in question
are currently being offset or being appealed.
4. Additional Considerations Involving § 424.530(a)(6)
The contractor shall also observe the following with respect to § 424.530(a)(6):
a. In determining whether an overpayment exists, the contractor need only review its own
records; it need not contact other contractors to determine whether the person or entity has an
overpayment in those contractor jurisdictions.
b. The instructions in this section 10.4.2.2(F) apply only to (i) initial enrollments and (ii) new
owners in a change of ownership.
c. The term “owner” under § 424.502 means any individual or entity that has any partnership
interest in, or that has 5 percent or more direct or indirect ownership of, the provider or supplier
as defined in sections 1124 and 1124A(A) of the Act.
d. If the person or entity had an overpayment at the time the application was filed but repaid it in
full by the time the contractor performed the review described in this section 10.4.2.2(F), the
contractor shall not deny the application based on § 424.530(a)(6).
G. Denial Reason 7– Medicare or Medicaid Payment Suspension (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(7))
(i) The provider or supplier, or any owning or managing employee or organization of the
provider or supplier, is currently under a Medicare or Medicaid payment suspension as defined
in §§ 405.370 through 405.372 or in § 455.23 of this chapter.
(ii) CMS may apply the provision in this paragraph (a)(7) to the provider or supplier under any
of the provider's, supplier's, or owning or managing employee's or organization's current or
former names, numerical identifiers, or business identities or to any of its existing enrollments.
(iii) In determining whether a denial is appropriate, CMS considers the following factors:
(A) The specific behavior in question.
(B) Whether the provider or supplier is the subject of other similar investigations.
(C) Any other information that CMS deems relevant to its determination.
H. Denial Reason 8– Home Health Agency (HHA) Capitalization (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(8))
An HHA submitting an initial application for enrollment:
a. Cannot, within 30 days of a CMS or Medicare contractor request, furnish supporting
documentation verifying that the HHA meets the initial reserve operating funds requirement in
42 CFR § 489.28(a); or
b. Fails to satisfy the initial reserve operating funds requirement in 42 CFR § 489.28(a).
I. Denial Reason 9– Hardship Exception Denial and Fee Not Paid (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(9))
“The institutional provider’s (as that term is defined in 42 CFR § 424.502) hardship exception
request is not granted, and the institutional provider does not submit the required application fee
within 30 days of notification that the hardship exception request was not approved.”
(This denial reason should only be used when the institutional provider fails to submit the
application fee after its hardship request was denied. The contractor shall use § 424.530(a)(1) as
a basis for denial when the institutional provider: (a) does not submit a hardship exception
request and fails to submit the application fee within the prescribed timeframes; or (b) submits
the fee, but it cannot be deposited into a government-owned account.)
J. Denial Reason 10– Temporary Moratorium (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(10))
“The provider or supplier submits an enrollment application for a practice location in a
geographic area where CMS has imposed a temporary moratorium.” (This denial reason applies
to initial enrollment applications and practice location additions.)
K. Denial Reason 11 – Prescribing Authority (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(11))
“1. A physician or eligible professional's Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Certificate of
Registration to dispense a controlled substance is currently suspended or revoked or is
surrendered in response to an order to show cause; or
2. The applicable licensing or administrative body for any state in which a physician or eligible
professional practices has suspended or revoked the physician or eligible professional's ability to
prescribe one or more drugs, and such suspension or revocation is in effect on the date the
physician or eligible professional submits the enrollment application to the Medicare contractor.”
(Except as otherwise stated in this chapter or in another CMS directive, the contractor need not
verify whether an individual’s DEA certificate was surrendered in response to a show cause
order.)
NOTE: With respect to (a)(11), PEOG -- rather than the contractor – will make all
determinations regarding whether this provision applies.
L. Denial Reason 12 (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(12) - Revoked Under Different Name,
Numerical Identifier, or Business Identity)
“The provider or supplier is currently revoked under a different name, numerical identifier, or
business identity, and the applicable reenrollment bar period has not expired. In making its
determination, CMS considers the following factors:
(i) Owning and managing employees and organizations (regardless of whether they have been
disclosed on the Form CMS-855 [or CMS-20134] application);
(ii) Geographic location;
(iii) Provider or supplier type;
(iv) Business structure; or
(v) Any evidence indicating that the two parties [the revoked provider/supplier and the newly-enrolling provider/supplier] are similar or that the provider or supplier was created to circumvent
the revocation or reenrollment bar.”
NOTE: With respect to (a)(12), PEOG – rather than the contractor – will make all determinations
regarding whether a provider or supplier was revoked under a different name, numerical
identifier or business identity.
M. Denial Reason 13 (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(13) - Affiliation that Poses an Undue Risk)
“The provider or supplier has or has had an affiliation under 42 CFR § 424.519 (specifically, the
factors listed in 42 CFR § 424.519(f)) that poses an undue risk of fraud, waste, and abuse to the
Medicare program.”
An affiliation is defined as any of the following:
(i) A 5 percent or greater direct or indirect ownership interest that an individual or entity has
in another organization.
(ii) A general or limited partnership interest (regardless of the percentage) that an individual
or entity has in another organization.
(iii) An interest in which an individual or entity exercises operational or managerial control
over, or directly or indirectly conducts, the day-to-day operations of another organization
(including, for purposes of § 424.519 only, sole proprietorships), either under contract or through
some other arrangement, regardless of whether or not the managing individual or entity is a W–2
employee of the organization.
(iv) An interest in which an individual is acting as an officer or director of a corporation.
(v) Any reassignment relationship under § 424.80.
NOTE: With respect to (a)(13), PEOG -- rather than the contractor – will make all
determinations regarding whether a provider or supplier has an affiliation per 42 CFR § 424.519
that poses an undue risk of fraud, waste and abuse.
N. Denial Reason 14 (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(14) – Other Program Termination or
Suspension)
“(1) The provider or supplier is currently terminated or suspended (or otherwise barred) from
participation in a state Medicaid program or any other federal health care program; or (2) the
provider or supplier’s license is currently revoked or suspended in a state other than that in which
the provider or supplier is enrolling.”
In determining whether a denial under § 424.530(a)(14) is appropriate, CMS considers the
following factors:
a. The reason(s) for the termination, suspension, or revocation;
b. Whether, as applicable, the provider or supplier is currently terminated or suspended (or
otherwise barred) from more than one program (for example, more than one state's Medicaid
program), has been subject to any other sanctions during its participation in other programs or by
any other state licensing boards, or has had any other final adverse actions (as that term is
defined in § 424.502) imposed against it; and
c. Any other information that CMS deems relevant to its determination.”
NOTE: With respect to (a)(14), PEOG -- rather than the contractor – will make all
determinations regarding whether a provider or supplier has a termination or suspension from
another program or has a license that is currently revoked or suspended in a state other than that
in which the provider or supplier is enrolling.
O. Denial Reason 15 (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(15) – Patient Harm)
“The physician or other eligible professional has been subject to prior action from a state
oversight board, federal or state health care program, Independent Review Organization (IRO)
determination(s), or any other equivalent governmental body or program that oversees, regulates,
or administers the provision of health care with underlying facts reflecting improper physician or
other eligible professional conduct that led to patient harm. In determining whether a denial is
appropriate, CMS considers the following factors:
(A) The nature of the patient harm
(B) The nature of the physician's or other eligible professional's conduct
(C) The number and type(s) of sanctions or disciplinary actions that have been imposed against
the physician or other eligible professional by a state oversight board, IRO, federal or state health
care program, or any other equivalent governmental body or program that oversees, regulates, or
administers the provision of health care. Such actions include, but are not limited to, procedures
or practices; (ii) required compliance appearances before state oversight board members; (iii)
license restriction(s) regarding the ability to treat certain types of patients; (iv)
administrative/monetary penalties; and (v) formal reprimand(s).
(D) If applicable, the nature of the IRO determination(s).
(E) The number of patients impacted by the physician's or other eligible professional's conduct
and the degree of harm thereto or impact upon.”
Section 424.530(a)(15) does not apply to actions or orders pertaining exclusively to either of the
following: (i) required participation in rehabilitation or mental/behavioral health programs; or (ii)
required abstinence from drugs or alcohol and random drug testing.
NOTE: With respect to (a)(15), PEOG -- rather than the contractor – will make all
determinations regarding whether this provision applies.
P. Denial Reason 17 – False Claims Act Judgment (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(17))
“(i) The provider or supplier, or any owner, managing employee or organization, officer, or
director of the provider or supplier, has had a civil judgment under the False Claims Act (31
U.S.C. 3729 through 3733) imposed against them within the previous 10 years.
(ii) In determining whether a denial under this paragraph is appropriate, CMS considers the
following factors:
(A) The number of provider or supplier actions that the judgment incorporates (for example, the
number of false claims submitted)
(B) The types of provider or supplier actions involved
(C) The monetary amount of the judgment
(D) When the judgment occurred
(E) Whether the provider or supplier has any history of final adverse actions (as that term is
defined in § 424.502)
(F) Any other information that CMS deems relevant to its determination.”
NOTE: With respect to (a)(17), PEOG -- rather than the contractor – will make all
determinations regarding whether this provision applies.
Q. Denial Reason 18 – Standard or Condition Violation (42 CFR § 424.530(a)(18))
(i) The independent diagnostic testing facility is non-compliant with any provision in 42 CFR
410.33(g).
(ii) The DMEPOS supplier is non-compliant with any provision in § 424.57(c).
(iii) The opioid treatment program is non-compliant with any provision in § 424.67(b) or (e).
(iv) The home infusion therapy supplier is non-compliant with any provision in § 424.68(c) or
(e).
(v) The Medicare diabetes prevention program is non-compliant with any provision in §
424.205(b) or (c).
(All denials based wholly, or in part, on § 424.530(a)(18) shall be sent to PEOG to obtain
approval of both the denial action itself and the denial letter. The contractor’s denial letter shall
cite the exact statutory and/or regulatory citation(s) containing the specific standard/condition
with which the provider/supplier is non-compliant. For a listing of some of these statutes and
regulations, refer to section 10.2 et seq. of this chapter.)
(See section 10.4.2.3 for more information regarding § 424.530(a)(18).)
History
(Rev. 13717; Issued: 07-08-26; Effective: 01-01-26; Implementation: 08-07-26)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
f922f0f5cd27afa8bf912e60b1d8f22a9fae48129407100c9fa6b16e9b2e9838
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.