US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 10, § 10.3.1.1.14
Form CMS-855A Processing Alternatives
The processing alternatives in this section 10.3.1.1.14 are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any
other processing alternatives described in this chapter or another CMS directive. These
processing alternatives also apply notwithstanding any instruction in this chapter to the contrary.
As stated in section 10.3, however, some of the application data elements and verification
procedures that have previously been subject to a processing exception/alternative may no longer
be so or are moot under PECOS 2.0. (See section 10.3 for a discussion of such data and
procedures.) In such situations, the contractor shall disregard the exception/alternative and
follow the instructions in sections 10.3 through 10.3.1.1.10.
A. General Principle
(Subject to the exceptions listed below as well as the instructions in section 10.3, the following
principle applies to all Form CMS-855A sections.)
If a data element on the provider’s Form CMS-855A application is missing but the information is
disclosed (1) elsewhere on the application or (2) in the supporting documentation submitted with
the application, the contractor need not obtain the missing data via an updated Form CMS-855A
page and a newly-signed certification statement; no further development – not even by telephone
– is required. The following information, however, must be furnished in the appropriate
section(s) of the Form CMS-855A, even if the data is identified elsewhere on the form or in the
supporting documentation:
(i) All organizational and individual ownership and managing control information on the Form
CMS-855A
(ii) Except as otherwise stated in section 10.6.6 of this chapter, any final adverse action data
requested in the Final Adverse Legal Actions/Convictions section and the final adverse legal
action history for any organization or individual listed in the Ownership Interest and/or
Managing Control Information sections of the Form CMS-855A
(iii) All legal business names (LBNs) (e.g., provider, chain home office) (NOTE: If an
application is submitted with a valid NPI and CCN combination but (1) the LBN field is blank,
(2) an incomplete or inaccurate LBN is submitted, or (3) the applicant includes a DBA name in
the Practice Location Information section of the Form CMS-855A and the contractor can
confirm the correct LBN based on the NPI-CCN combination provided, the contractor need not
develop.)
(iv) All tax identification numbers (TINs) (e.g., provider, owning organization)
(v) NPI-legacy number combinations in the Practice Location Information section of the Form
CMS-855A (NOTE: The contractor may use the shared systems, PECOS, or its provider files as
a resource to determine the PTAN or NPI before developing with the provider.)
(vi) Provider type
(vii) The following data in the Change of Ownership (CHOW), Acquisitions/Mergers or
Consolidations sections of the Form CMS-855A:
• DBA name
• Effective dates of sale/transfer/consolidation
• Checkbox in the Identifying Information (CHOW Information) section indicating whether
buyer will accept assets/liabilities
• Names of units with separate legacy numbers/NPIs
• All NPIs and legacy numbers (NOTE: The contractor may use the shared systems, PECOS,
or its provider files as a resource to determine the CCN or NPI before developing with the
provider).
B. Supporting Documentation Resubmission
If supporting documentation currently exists in the provider’s file, the provider need not submit
that documentation again during the enrollment process. The contractor shall utilize the existing
documentation for verification. In short, documentation submitted with a previously submitted
enrollment application (or documentation currently uploaded in PECOS) qualifies as a
processing alternative (unless stated otherwise in this chapter or any CMS directive).
C. City, State, and ZIP Code
If an address in any section of the Form CMS-855A (e.g., correspondence address, practice
location) lacks a city, state, or zip + four, the contractor can verify the missing data in any
manner it chooses. In addition, the contractor can obtain the “zip + four” from either the U.S.
Postal Service or the Delivery Point Validation in PECOS.
D. Licenses
In situations where the provider is required to submit a copy of a particular professional or
business license, certification, or registration but fails to do so, the contractor need not obtain
such documentation from the provider if the contractor can verify the information independently.
The contractor can do this by: (1) reviewing and printing confirmation pages from the applicable
state web site; (2) requesting and receiving from the appropriate state body written confirmation
of the provider’s status therewith; and (3) using any other third-party verification source. In
addition, if the provider submits a copy of the applicable license, certification, or registration but
fails to complete the appropriate section of the form, the section need not be completed if the
data in question can be verified on the license/certification itself or via any of the three
mechanisms above. The contractor shall, however, note the following:
(i) The above-referenced written confirmation from a state body of the provider’s status can be
in the form of a letter, fax, or e-mail, but it must be in writing. Documentation of a verbal
conversation between the contractor and the body in question does not qualify as appropriate
confirmation.
(ii) The aforementioned licensure exception only applies to those documents that traditionally
fall within the category of licenses, registrations, or certifications. It is inapplicable to materials
such as adverse action documentation, bills of sale, etc. Furthermore, the exception is moot in
cases where: (a) the state does not require a particular license/certification; or (b) the
license/certification has not been obtained because a state survey has not yet been performed.
E. Documentation of Missing Information Elsewhere
The contractor shall document in PECOS that the missing information covered under this section
10.3.1.1.14 was found elsewhere in the enrollment package. However, this excludes information
that must be verified at the current point in time (i.e., a license without a primary source
verification method).
F. Relationship to Opt-Out
The contractor shall not utilize information submitted with opt-out applications for enrollment
application processing or vice-versa.
History
(Rev. 11839; Issued: 02-09-23; Effective: 04-21-23; Implementation: 06-19-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
904961e41d23f909e641f61873e33e5ab1659b9cd371f0b2624a37f640e32deb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.