US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 10, § 10.2.1.9
Indian Health Services (IHS) Facilities
A. General Background Information
For purposes of provider enrollment only, there are several types of IHS facilities: (1) those
that are wholly owned and operated by the IHS; (2) facilities owned by the IHS but tribally
operated; and (3) facilities wholly owned and operated by a tribe, though under the general
IHS umbrella. When an IHS facility wishes to enroll with the Part A contractor, it may
check in Section 2A of the Form CMS-855A either (a) “Indian Health Services Facility” or
(b) the specific provider type it is. For instance, if an IHS hospital is involved, the provider
may check “Indian Health Services Facility” or “Hospital” on the application - or perhaps
both. Even if it only checked “Hospital,” the LBN or DBA Name will typically contain some
type of reference to Indian Health Services. The contractor will therefore know that an IHS
facility is involved.
The overwhelming majority of IHS facilities on the Part A side are either hospitals, SNFs,
CAHs, or ESRD facilities. The contractor processes IHS applications in the same manner
(and via the same procedures) as it would with a hospital, SNF, etc. (This also applies to
procedures for PECOS entry.)
As for CCNs, the IHS facility uses the same series that its concomitant provider type does.
That is, an IHS hospital uses the same CCN series as a “regular” hospital, an IHS CAH
utilizes the same series as a regular CAH, and so forth.
B. Enrollment Information
IHS facilities and tribal providers may use Internet -based PECOS or the paper Form
CMS-855 enrollment application for their enrollment transactions. The designated
Medicare contractor for IHS facilities and tribal providers is Novitas Solutions
(Novitas).
If the IHS facility or tribal provider mails its Form CMS -855 to a Medicare contractor
other than Novitas, that contractor shall forward the application directly to Novitas at
the following address:
Novitas Solutions, Inc.
P.O. Box 3115
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-1858
C. Licensure Requirements for Physicians and Practitioners Enrolling to Work in or
Reassign Benefits to an Indian Tribe or Tribal Organization
The Affordable Care Act (Pub. L 111-148) amended Section 221 of the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act such that licensed health professionals employed by a tribal health program are,
if licensed in any state, exempt from the licensing requirements of the state in which the tribal
program performs the services described in the contract or compact of the tribal health program
under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) (25 U.S.C. 450, et
seq.). Pursuant to this statutory provision, therefore, a physician or practitioner need only be
licensed in one state – regardless of whether that state is the one in which the individual practices
– if the individual is employed by a tribal health program performing services as permitted under
the ISDEAA (see Pub. 100-04, chapter 19, section 10 for definitions).
The contractor shall apply this policy when processing applications from these individuals. In
terms of the effective date of Medicare billing privileges, the contractor shall continue to apply the
provisions of 42 CFR §§ 424.520(d) and 424.521(a) and section 10.6.2 of this chapter.
D. Additional Information
For additional general information on IHS facilities, see Pub. 100-04, chapter 19.
History
(Rev. 13355; Issued: 08-13-25; Effective: 05-05-25; Implementation: 05-05-25)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
e2bfdeb214bea1bdf6b493ff0e231a03f155bfba82b291c5f17b9278b03f840b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.