US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 10, § 10.2.1.11
Outpatient Physical Therapy/Outpatient Speech Pathology
Services (OPT/OSP)
(Rev.: 12796; Issued: 08-15-24; Effective: 09-16-24; Implementation: 09-16-24)
A. General Background Information
Physical therapists and speech pathologists provide therapy targeting a person’s ability to move
and perform functional activities in their daily lives typically inhibited by illness or injury. Care
is typically coordinated by therapists in conjunction with a physician and is based on an agreed
upon plan of care.
As explained in Pub. 100-07, chapter 2 section 2292, there are three types of organizations that
may qualify as providers of OPT and OSP services under 42 CFR Part 485, Subpart H: clinics,
public health clinics, and rehabilitation agencies. However, rehabilitation agencies are the only
organizations that are currently enrolled as a Medicare provider with a CCN. The primary
purpose of a rehabilitation agency is to improve or rehabilitate an injury or disability and to tailor
a rehabilitation program to meet the specific rehabilitation needs of each patient referred to the
agency. A rehabilitation agency must provide, at a minimum, physical therapy and/or speech
language pathology services to address those needs of the patients. Social/vocational services
are no longer a requirement.
Note that:
• If an OPT/OSP provider elects to convert to a CORF, it must meet the CORF conditions of
coverage and participation. An initial Form CMS-855A enrollment application, state survey,
and CMS program approval are also required.
• Only those OTP/OSP providers covered under 42 CFR Part 485, Subpart H that furnish
OPT/OSP services (as listed above) have provider agreements under 42 CFR § 489.2. Part B
physician groups – the supplier type that most people normally associate with the term
“clinics” – do not have certified provider or certified supplier agreements.
• Occupational therapy cannot be substituted for the physical therapy requirement. It may,
however, be provided in addition to physical therapy or speech pathology services. (See Pub.
100-07, chapter 2, section 2292A.)
There is no prohibition against an organization operating on the premises of a supplier (e.g.,
physician or chiropractor) or another provider if they are not operating in the same space at the
same time. (See Pub. 100-07, chapter 2, section 2304.)
B. Processing Instructions for OPT/OSP Initial Form CMS-855A Applications
1. Receipt of Application
Upon receipt of an OPT/OSP initial Form CMS-855A application, the contractor shall undertake
the following (in whichever order the contractor prefers unless directed otherwise in this
chapter):
(A) Perform all data validations otherwise required per this chapter.
(B) Ensure that the application(s) is complete consistent with the instructions in this chapter.
(C) Ensure that the OPT/OSP has submitted all documentation otherwise required per this
chapter. For OPT/OSP initial enrollment, this also includes the following:
• Form CMS-1561 (Health Insurance Benefit Agreement, also known as a “provider
agreement”)
• Evidence of successful electronic submission of the Form HHS-690 through the Office of
Civil Rights (OCR) portal, as applicable. (Evidence should be either written or electronic
documentation.) (See https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/forms/hhs-690.pdf for more
information.)
(The OPT/OSP must complete, sign, date, and include the Form CMS-1561, though the
OPT/OSP need not complete those sections of the form reserved for CMS. For organizational
OPT/OSPs, an authorized official (as defined in § 424.502) must sign the form; for sole
proprietorships, the sole proprietor must sign.)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Form CMS-1561 or the Form HHS-690 evidence is
missing, unsigned, undated, or otherwise incomplete, the contractor need not develop for the
form(s) or the information thereon; the contractor shall instead notify the state in its
recommendation letter which document(s) was/were missing or otherwise incomplete. For all
other missing or incomplete required documentation, the contractor shall follow the normal
development instructions in this chapter.
2. Conclusion of Initial Contractor Review
(Nothing in this section 10.2.1.11(B) prohibits the contractor from returning or rejecting the
OPT/OSP application if otherwise permitted to do so per this chapter. When returning or
rejecting the application, the contractor shall follow this chapter’s procedures for doing so.)
(A) Approval Recommendation
If, consistent with the instructions in section 10.2.1.11(B) and this chapter, the contractor
believes an approval recommendation is warranted, the contractor shall send the
recommendation to the state pursuant to existing practice and this chapter’s instructions. The
contractor need not copy the SOG Location or PEOG on the recommendation. Unless CMS
directs otherwise, the contractor shall also send to the provider the notification letter in section
10.7.5.1(E) of this chapter.
The state will: (1) review the recommendation package for completeness; (2) review the
contractor’s recommendation for approval; (3) perform any state-specific functions; and (4)
contact the contractor with any questions. The contractor shall respond to any state inquiry in
Item (4) within 5 business days. If the inquiry involves the need for the contractor to obtain
additional data, documentation, or clarification from the OPT/OSP, however, the timeframe is 15
business days; if the provider fails to respond to the contractor within this timeframe, it shall
notify the state thereof. The contractor may always contact its PEOG BFL should it need the
latter’s assistance with a particular state inquiry.
(B) Denial
If the contractor determines that a denial is warranted, it shall follow the denial procedures
outlined in this chapter. This includes: (1) using the appropriate denial letter format in section
10.7.8 of this chapter; and (2) if required under section 10.6.6 (or another CMS directive) of this
chapter, referring the matter to PEOG for review prior to denying the application.
3. Completion of State Review
The state will notify the contractor once it has completed its review. There are two potential
outcomes:
(A) Approval Not Recommended
If the state does not recommend approval, it will notify the contractor thereof. (The contractor
may accept any notification that is in writing (e-mail is fine).) No later than 5 business days after
receiving this notification the contractor shall commence the actions described in section
10.2.1.11(B)(2)(B) above.
(B) Approval Recommended
If the state recommends approval, it will typically (though not always) do so via a Form CMS-
1539; the contractor may accept any documentation from the state signifying that the latter
recommends approval. (Note that the contractor will not receive a formal tie-in notice.)
No later than 5 business days after receipt of the recommendation from the state, the contractor
shall send an e-mail to MedicareProviderEnrollment@cms.hhs.gov with the following
information and documents:
• The Form CMS-855 application (or PECOS Application Data Report) and all application
attachments
• A copy of the Form CMS-1539 or similar documentation received from the state
• A copy of the provider-signed Form CMS-1561
• A copy of the draft approval letter, with the effective date shown on the Form CMS-1539 (or
similar documentation) included in the draft letter. (See section 10.7.5.1 for the model
approval letter.)
PEOG will countersign the provider agreement. Based on the information received from the
contractor, PEOG will also (1) assign an effective date, (2) assign a CCN, and (3) enter the
applicable data into ASPEN, and (4) approve (with possible edits) the approval letter.
Within 5 business days of receiving from PEOG the signed provider agreement, effective date,
and CCN, the contractor shall: (1) send the approval letter and a copy of the CMS-countersigned
provider agreement to the OPT/OSP; (2) send a copy of both the approval letter and the provider
agreement to the state and/or AO (as applicable)); and (3) switch the PECOS record from
“approval recommended” to “approved” consistent with existing instructions.
C. Extension Locations
1. Background
As discussed in Pub. 100-07, chapter 2, sections 2298 and 2298A, an OPT/OSP provider can, in
certain instances, furnish services from locations other than its primary site. (The provider must
designate one location as its primary location on the Form CMS-855A, however.) These sites
are called extension locations. An extension location is defined at 42 CFR § 485.703 as “a
location or site from which a rehabilitation agency provides services within a portion of the total
geographic area served by the primary site. The extension location is part of the agency. The
extension location should be located sufficiently close to share administration, supervision, and
services in a manner that renders it unnecessary for the extension location to independently meet
the conditions of participation as a rehabilitation agency.” Per Pub. 100-07, chapter 2, section
2298A, only rehabilitation agencies are permitted to have extension locations. The clinics
operated by physicians and public health clinics are not permitted extension locations. These
two providers must provide outpatient therapy services at their Medicare approved location.
An OPT/OSP provider may also furnish therapy services in a patient’s home or in a patient’s
room in a SNF. (See Pub. 100-07, chapter 2, section 2300. Note that when the OPT provides
services away from the primary site or extension location(s), this is referred to as “off-premises
activity” at other locations. Section 2300 (referenced) above discusses such activities.) Because
these are not considered extension locations, neither the home nor the patient’s room need be
listed as a practice location on the provider’s Form CMS-855A. (See Pub. 100-07, chapter 2,
section 2298B.)
OPT/OSP extension sites fall under the parent’s Medicare provider agreement and CCN. They
are assigned and identified by a unique 10-digit alphanumeric identification number (also
sometimes referred to as a “Medicare Branch ID”) linked to the parent CCN. PEOG is
responsible for the assignment or termination of OPT/OSP extension site identifiers and for
updating ASPEN accordingly.
2. Extension Site Changes
All extension site additions, deletions, changes, and relocations require a Form CMS-855A
change of information application.
a. Additions
An addition or relocation/change of an extension site requires a referral to the state and thereafter
to PEOG to review for final determination prior to approval. The approval letter sent to the
OPT/OSP provider, with a copy to the state and/or AO, should include the assigned Medicare
Branch ID and the effective date of the added or relocated extension site. The effective date of
coverage for services provided from the extension site is the date CMS determines that the
extension site meets all applicable federal requirements.
b. Deletions
Deletions do not require a referral to the state but do require post approval correspondence with
PEOG and the state (and, if applicable, the accrediting organization) per section 10.6.1.2(B) of
this chapter.
D. CHOWs
For OPT/OSP CHOWs, the contractor shall follow the instructions in section 10.6.1.1 of this
chapter.
E. Additional Information
For more information on OPT/OSP providers, refer to:
• Section 1861(p) of the Social Security Act
• 42 CFR Part 485, subpart H
• Pub. 100-07, chapter 2, sections 2290 – 2308
• Pub. 100-07, Appendix E
History
(Rev.: 12796; Issued: 08-15-24; Effective: 09-16-24; Implementation: 09-16-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
fc1237b52528c2b4fe1f9395de4102076792a5d581c982cac86f81a22ca06a44
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.