US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 8, § 8.4.3.1
Selection of Period for Review
Following selection of the provider or supplier, the contractor in conjunction with a
statistical expert shall determine the time period and the number of days, weeks, months,
or years for which sampling units will be reviewed. For RACs and SMRC, CMS will
approve the time period. The target universe shall be selected based on these criteria.
The scope of the review is determined by considering several factors that include, but are
not limited to:
• How long the pattern of sustained or high level of payment error is believed to
have existed,
• The volume of claims that are involved,
• The length of time that a national coverage decision or local coverage
determination has been in effect,
• The extent of prepayment review already conducted or currently being
conducted,
• The dollar value of the claims that are involved relative to the cost of the
sample,
• The applicable time periods for reopening claims (see Pub. 100-04, chapter 34,
section 10.6),
• A clear specification of the specific data elements to be used for defining the
date (type of date, e.g., day, month, year).
As examples: If dates of service are used, specify, as needed, whether the dates
are line service dates or claim service dates, the first day of the billing statement
or the ending date of service, etc. If a span of dates is used, clarify the criteria
used when the span overlaps the boundary of one of the other criterion date
ranges. If paid dates or receipt dates are used, clarify the role of the adjusted
claims.
All case documentation, including the overpayment demand letter and
methodology, should consistently reflect the same date range and specify the
same type of date.
NOTE: When sampling claims that are paid through cost report (as opposed to claims
paid under a PPS reimbursement methodology), all claims reviewed must be
drawn from within a provider’s/supplier’s defined cost reporting year. If the
period under review is greater than one year, it is important to select a
separate sample for each cost-reporting year.
History
(Rev. 906; Issued: 09-26-19; Effective: 01-02-19; Implementation: 01-02-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
ce311ffdf71494ac57207233c4f092a9c08f781662219d6957e383be256cc696
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.