Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 8, § 8.3.2.2.5

Opportunity for Rebuttal

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

If the payment suspension is approved with prior notice, the provider is afforded an

opportunity to submit to the UPIC a statement within 15 calendar days indicating why

the payment suspension action should not be imposed. However, this time may be

shortened or lengthened for cause. (See 42 CFR §405.374(b).)

If the payment suspension is approved without prior notice, the provider is also afforded

an opportunity to submit to the UPIC a statement as to why the payment suspension

action should not be imposed. (See 42 CFR §405.372(b)(2).) For purposes of consistency

for both prior notice and no prior notice, CMS/CPI suggests that a 15 calendar day

response time be established for the provider.

If a provider submits a rebuttal timely, a timely determination and written response by

the UPIC is required in accordance with 42 CFR §405.375. If a provider does not

respond in a timely manner, the UPIC shall submit a written response to the provider

within 30 calendar days from the receipt date of the rebuttal.

UPICs shall ensure the following:

• CMS Review – UPICs shall forward the provider’s rebuttal statement and

any pertinent information to CPI via the UCM within 1 business day of

receipt. The UPIC shall evaluate the information presented and then draft a

response addressing each item mentioned in the rebuttal and submit it to CPI for

approval via the UCM no later than 10 calendar days from receipt. The UPIC may

contact CPI for guidance before drafting a response.

• Timing –The payment suspension shall go into effect as indicated in the

notice.

• Review of Rebuttal – Because payment suspension actions are not

appealable, the rebuttal is the provider’s only opportunity to present

information as to why suspension action should not be initiated or should be

terminated. UPICs shall carefully review the provider’s rebuttal statement

and pertinent information, and shall consider all facts and issues raised by the

provider. If the UPIC is convinced that the payment suspension action should

not be initiated or should be terminated, it shall consult with the CPI for

guidance.

• Response – CMS is obligated to consider the initial rebuttal and supportive

information received from the provider and to make a determination within

15 calendar days from receipt of the rebuttal. (See 42 CFR §405.375(a).) If a

full response cannot be drafted in the required timeframe, the UPIC shall

draft an interim response for release that is approved by CPI.

History

(Rev. 11032; Issued: 09-30-21; Effective: 10-12-21; Implementation: 11-10-21)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
35a565cb779b8932e6dca1a2f1fa9ce6f97be53d4b802323d18bc81a0a6ae809
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.