US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 8, § 8.3.2.1
CMS Approval
If the UPIC believes that a UPIC-initiated Payment Suspension is a viable option for an
investigation, they shall update UCM appropriately to ensure the case is included on the
next case coordination meeting agenda for discussion. For national or multi-regional
suspensions, only the lead UPIC shall discuss the suspension at the case coordination
meeting.
During the case coordination meeting, if CMS agrees that the criteria for Payment
Suspension is met, CMS will instruct the UPIC to submit the Payment Suspension
recommendation(s) with the completed AAR form to CPI through the UCM. The
Payment Suspension team member will review the submissions and make a formal
determination as to whether a Payment Suspension is a viable option.
During the case coordination meeting, the UPIC may receive additional guidance from
CMS related to subsequent actions related to these investigations. If the UPIC has
questions following the case coordination meeting, the UPIC shall coordinate with its
COR, BFL, and/or suspension team member, as needed.
When a payment suspension is approved by CPI, the UPIC shall inform the respective
MAC of this action and the MAC shall effectuate the suspension of payments to the
provider unless prior notice of the payment suspension is necessary. When prior notice is
necessary, the MAC shall effectuate the suspension of payment in concert with the
established date from the payment suspension notice.
For all payment suspensions, the UPIC shall request the MAC implement a “payment
suspension” or “partial payment suspension” when applicable. For all payment
suspensions and emergency payment suspensions, the MAC shall no longer use "F_Fraud
and Abuse", “F_CMS Request” or “P_CMS Request” HIGLAS hold reason codes for
UPIC requested payment suspension activities. MACs shall only use "F_PSC Request"
(Full Hold) or “P_PSC Request”(Partial Hold) HIGLAS hold reason codes going forward
for all UPIC requested payment suspension and emergency payment suspension
activities.
UPICs shall not request that MACs create placeholder debts or “escrow amounts” based
on anticipated provider settlements. The MAC shall no longer create these debts in
HIGLAS. If a UPIC requests a MAC to create a placeholder debt, the MAC shall reach
out to OFM for guidance before any action is taken.
The MACs shall ensure that all money on the payment floor is not released to the
provider after the effective date of the suspension and the money is withheld in
accordance with the payment suspension rules and regulations. MACs shall provide an
accounting of the money withheld on day one of the payment suspension to the UPIC.
The UPIC shall enter this amount in the UCM as the first monetary entry.
Unless otherwise specified, when a payment suspension is imposed, no payments are to
be released to the provider as of the effective date of the payment suspension. This
includes payments for new claims processed, payments for adjustments to claims
previously paid, interim PIPs. If it is discovered that money is released to the provider
after the effective date of the payment suspension, the MAC or UPIC shall contact CPI
for guidance.
History
(Rev.: 13762; Issued: 05-27-26 ; Effective: 06-29-26 ; Implementation: 06-29-26)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
87c2782b78fb7dc58a2b1680626c34e00c347caa411bb18d96034cd5a45fa457
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.