Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 8, § 8.2.3.2

Conduct of Expanded Review Based on Statistical Sampling

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

for Overpayment Estimation and Recoupment of Projected

Overpayment by Contractors

(Rev. 10228; Issued: 07-27-20; Effective: 08-27-20; Implementation: 08-27-20)

The MACs shall perform the actual recoupment identified by the UPICs. When a UPIC

or medical review audit determines an extrapolated overpayment the sample claims

reviewed are adjusted for denial. For history purposes, contractors shall deny the sample

claims individually in the shared system and shall suppress the sample claims from going

to HIGLAS. Once the entire extrapolated amount is identified, contractors shall create

one large account receivable (AR) for the extrapolated amount (including the adjusted

sample claim amounts) to demand and recoup.

A. If an expanded review of claims is conducted, contractors shall follow the sampling

instructions found in section 8.4 of this chapter, obtain and review claims and medical

records, and document for each claim reviewed:

ο The amount of the original claim;

ο The allowed amount;

ο The rationale for denial;

o The §1879 determination for each assigned claim in the sample denied because the

service was not medically reasonable and necessary (or the §1842(1) provider/supplier

refund determination on non-assigned provider/supplier claims denied on the basis of

§1862(a)(1)(A)) (refer to Exhibit 14.1 of this manual);

ο The §1870 determination for the provider/supplier for each overpaid assigned claim

in the sample (refer to Exhibit 14.2 of this manual); and

ο The amount of overpayment (after allowance for deductible and coinsurance).

B. Contractors calculate the projected overpayment by extrapolating from the actual

overpayment to the universe that excludes those claims determined that the

provider/supplier did not have knowledge that the service was not medically necessary;

C. Notify the provider/supplier of the preliminary projected overpayment findings and

review findings;

D. If the provider/supplier submits additional documentation, review the material and

adjust the preliminary projected overpayment findings, accordingly;

E. Calculate the final overpayment; and

F. Refer to the overpayment recoupment staff.

History

(Rev. 10228; Issued: 07-27-20; Effective: 08-27-20; Implementation: 08-27-20)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
2530c27ee1825e41f9c5b6c032fdff09f71ea246cc2bd00662b5e267679761ae
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.