US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 7, § 7.2.2
Definitions
The reporting process will require data that can be classified under three different
categories of activity measures: Workload, Cost, and Savings. The Medical Review
definitions shall apply to all Medical Review activities and shall not be deviated from or
interpreted differently than stated below. The consistency in the application of these
definitions will provide validity to the data reported that is required to assess the
effectiveness of the CMS Medical Review and Education Program being administered by
the Contractor(s)
MEDICAL REVIEW
The review of claims and associated medical documentation that occurs when review
staff:
1. Make a coverage decision (benefit category, statutory exclusion, or reasonable
and necessary) and a coding decision to determine the appropriate payment for
claims, or
2. Investigate complaints to determine whether a corrective action was effective
(e.g., an MR activity such as provider notification letter), or identify situations
that require prepayment edits or the development of a local coverage
determination (LCD).
The medical review process requires the application of clinical judgment either as part of
a review, in writing policies, or in the development of guidelines and processing
instructions. For local medical review edits, input must be from the Contractor Medical
Review clinicians/staff. For national edits, input from the Contractor medical/clinical
staff is not necessary. The medical review can be performed either before or after the
claim has been paid. Generally, a line cannot result in medical review workload or
savings if it is not referred to medical review. A line that potentially involves both
medical review and claims processing work should suspend to a claims processing
reviewer, and that reviewer should refer the line to medical review only if the claims
processing reviewer cannot make a decision based on guidelines available to that
reviewer.
Do NOT consider the review as medical review if it requires:
1. Pricing Only, or
2. Coding Only, or
3. Pricing and Coding only.
Consider the review as medical review if:
1. Pricing is based on medical record review determination. or
2. Coding is based on medical record review determination, or
3. Coding and Pricing are based on medical record review determination.
If an automated claims processing edit has already made a decision to pay, and the claim
only suspends for pricing, consider the review automated claims processing and do not
count it for medical review workload or costs.
History
(Rev. 721; Issued: 06-09-17; Effective: 07-11-17; Implementation: 07-11-17)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
2466148c72b13216b169ff9813ddec8473d84870913f4ad27ca4762317ce8dfa
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.