Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 7, § 7.1.2.7.2

QA for Development of the Prioritized Problem List

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The MAC shall list the data and the metrics used to determine and verify each identified

prioritized problem. That is, each identified prioritized problem shall have an

explanation of current data and other information used to support the decisions to include

the problem and assign its priority. The QA process shall ensure that MR activities and

improper payment interventions are not dedicated to problems that are consistently

overturned on appeal, based on outdated data analysis, or the focus of other operational

areas of the MAC with similar goals.

The QA shall be performed for each intervention that checks for effectiveness and

progress towards the specified goal. The QA component shall include a projected goal, a

timeline to achieve the goal, and an element to assess effectiveness of the intervention

and progress towards the stated goal. The QA component shall include a determination

of whether the problem has been resolved or partially met, or whether a more progressive

course of action is required. The MAC shall evaluate the effectiveness of edits and the

priority status of the problem. An effective QA process shall also include periodic

meetings with other operational areas, such as POE.

History

(Rev. 599, Issued: 06-26-15, Effective: 12-07-15, Implementation: 12-07-15)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
9f1d77638f114e3abeaea274fdd861a85b592306e566f3c6a400cfd9cd1e45c0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.