US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 6, § 6.6
Referrals to the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO)
The MACs shall only refer Quality of (Health) Care Concerns to the QIOs. A Quality of
(Health) Care Concern is defined as “a concern that care provided did not meet a
professionally recognized standard of health care.” The Contractor shall follow the
referral process as agreed upon in the QIO-MAC Joint Operating Agreement. The QIOs
will retain their responsibility for performing expedited determinations, Hospital-Issued
Notices of Non-Coverage (HINN) reviews, quality reviews, transfer reviews, readmission
reviews and, provider-requested higher-weighted DRG reviews.
The Circumvention of PPS will continue to be reported to your UPIC. The quality
initiatives associated with payment for performance are now the reporting source for
Readmission Reviews and Transfer Review data to the QIOs. Non-covered
benefits/services are not to be reported to the QIO.
All initial payment determinations and claim adjustments are required to be performed by
the MAC.
All MACs are to turn off all automated edits/processes that generate a referral to the
QIOs prior to a medical record review of the claim. Referrals to the QIO shall be limited
to Quality of Health Care issues as defined above and shall result from a clinician’s
medical record review of a provider’s medical documentation.
If during the medical record review process, “a concern that care provided did not meet a
professionally recognized standard of health care,” the MAC shall issue a payment
determination and/or adjustment for the claim, complete the QIO referral form, and
forward the completed referral form and file(s) to the QIO. If the referral form is not
complete, the QIO will return the file to the MAC and request that the MAC provide the
missing information prior to the QIO performing a review.
A non-covered service and/or procedure shall not be automatically referred to the QIO.
The MAC shall make the initial payment determination and/or claim adjustment for a
non-covered service or procedure in accordance with the Medicare IOM 100-04, Claims
Processing Manual and IOM 100-02, Benefit Policy Manual.
If during the medical record review process, “a concern that care provided did not meet a
professionally recognized standard of health care,” such as a medically unnecessary
procedure, the claim shall be referred to the QIO for quality review after payment
determination and/or claim adjustment is made.
The MACs shall not instruct providers, suppliers, or beneficiaries to refer payment issues
to the QIO. If the provider or supplier does not agree with the payment and/or claim
adjustment decision, the MAC shall communicate their options to follow the current
process in IOM 100-08, requesting a reopening or an appeal. If the beneficiary disagrees
with the payment decision and makes a request for re-evaluation/redetermination, this
will be considered a demand bill and is the responsibility of the MAC.
History
(Rev. 10365; Issued: 10-02-20; Effective: 08-27-20; Implementation: 08-27-20)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
8a549df63e18ecd2e35e23a332a2c7a514e7bb691d9a825b325a5ed6481a21d9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.