US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 4, § 4.2.1
Examples of Medicare Fraud
This section applies to UPICs, SMRCs and MACs.
The most frequent kind of fraud arises from a false statement or misrepresentation
made, or caused to be made, that is material to entitlement or payment under the
Medicare program. The violator may be a provider/supplier, a beneficiary, an employee
of a provider/supplier, or some other person or business entity, including a billing
service or a contractor employee.
Providers/suppliers have an obligation, under law, to conform to the requirements of
the Medicare program. Fraud committed against the program may be prosecuted under
various provisions of the United States Code and could result in the imposition of
restitution, fines, and, in some instances, imprisonment. In addition, a range of
administrative sanctions (such as exclusion from participation in the program) and
CMPs may be imposed when facts and circumstances warrant such action.
Fraud may take such forms as (this is not an exhaustive list):
• Incorrect reporting of diagnoses or procedures to maximize payments;
• Billing for services not furnished and/or supplies not provided. This
includes billing Medicare for appointments that the patient failed to keep;
• Billing that appears to be a deliberate application for duplicate payment for
the same services or supplies, billing both Medicare and the beneficiary for the
same service, or billing both Medicare and another insurer in an attempt to get
paid twice;
• Altering claim forms, electronic claim records, medical documentation, etc.,
to obtain a higher payment amount;
• Soliciting, offering, or receiving a kickback, bribe, or rebate (e.g., paying for
a referral of patients in exchange for the ordering of diagnostic tests and other
services or medical equipment);
• Unbundling or “exploding” charges;
• Completing Certificates of Medical Necessity for patients not personally
and professionally known by the provider;
• Participating in schemes that involve collusion between a provider and
a beneficiary, or between a supplier and a beneficiary;
• Participating in schemes that involve collusion between a provider and a
MAC employee where the claim is assigned (e.g., the provider deliberately
overbills for services, and the MAC employee then generates adjustments with
little or no awareness on the part of the beneficiary);
• Billing based on “gang visits,” (e.g., a physician visits a nursing home and
bills for 20 nursing home visits without furnishing any specific service to
individual patients);
• Misrepresenting dates and descriptions of services furnished or the identity
of the beneficiary or the individual who furnished the services;
• Billing non-covered or non-chargeable services as covered items;
• Repeatedly violating the participation agreement, assignment agreement, or
the limitation amount;
• Knowingly allowing a beneficiary to use another person's Medicare card to
obtain medical care;
• Giving false information about provider ownership; or
• Using the adjustment payment process to generate fraudulent payments.
Examples of cost report fraud include (this is not an exhaustive list):
• Incorrectly apportioning costs on cost reports;
• Including costs of non-covered services, supplies, or equipment in
allowable costs;
• Providers making arrangements with employees, independent contractors,
suppliers, and others that appear to be designed primarily to overcharge the
program through various devices (commissions, fee splitting) to siphon off
or conceal illegal profits;
• Billing Medicare for costs that were not incurred or were attributable to
non- program activities, other enterprises, or personal expenses;
• Repeatedly including unallowable cost items on a provider's cost report
for purposes of establishing a basis for appeal;
• Manipulating statistics to obtain additional payment, such as increasing
the square footage in the outpatient areas to maximize payment;
• Claiming bad debts without first genuinely attempting to collect payment;
• Making improper payments to physicians for certain hospital-based
physician arrangements;
• Paying amounts to owners or administrators that have been determined to
be excessive in prior cost report settlements;
• Reporting days improperly that result in an overpayment if not adjusted;
• Depreciating assets that have been fully depreciated or sold;
• Using depreciation methods not approved by Medicare;
• Repaying interest expense for loans that were for an offset of interest
income against the interest expense;
• Reporting program data where provider program amounts cannot be supported;
• Allocating costs improperly related to organizations that have been
determined to be improper; or
• Manipulating accounting
History
(Rev. 902, Issued: 09-27-19, Effective: 10-28-19, Implementation: 10-28-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
f0a0cf51044556341106ae7cfd826a2c2f2dad8cbc2af460133c72fafe7a8245
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.